First casualty?
Josh Duggar
http://gawker.com/family-values-activist-josh-duggar-had-a-paid-ashley-ma-1725132091
Josh Duggar
http://gawker.com/family-values-activist-josh-duggar-had-a-paid-ashley-ma-1725132091
First casualty?
Josh Duggar
http://gawker.com/family-values-activist-josh-duggar-had-a-paid-ashley-ma-1725132091

I like this because it damages their brand.
And since their brand is really harmful to society in general and women in particular, any damage is a benefit to society.
Makes them look like fools whose religion isn't really good for anything.
And that's a truth that needs to get out!
Isn't that more damaging. This in of itself is damning for someone at FRC.It isn't clear that the "revelation" that a pedophile also likes adult women other than his wife is that damaging.
Not quite, as it is up to date bullshit. The other stuff was later in the past bullshit.It's like throwing a candle into a housefire.
I like this because it damages their brand.
And since their brand is really harmful to society in general and women in particular, any damage is a benefit to society.
Makes them look like fools whose religion isn't really good for anything.
And that's a truth that needs to get out!
You talking about Ashley Madison or Family Research Council?
I do not think his behavior at 14 shows that he is a "pedophile".It isn't clear that the "revelation" that a pedophile also likes adult women other than his wife is that damaging.
You talking about Ashley Madison or Family Research Council?
FRC/Duggar.
No kidding.The Christian Taliban will just rout around the damage.
I do not think his behavior at 14 shows that he is a "pedophile".It isn't clear that the "revelation" that a pedophile also likes adult women other than his wife is that damaging.
Also, have the accounts in question been conclusively linked to him? Could have been somebody using a fake name.
First casualty?
Josh Duggar
http://gawker.com/family-values-activist-josh-duggar-had-a-paid-ashley-ma-1725132091
You talking about Ashley Madison or Family Research Council?I like this because it damages their brand.
And since their brand is really harmful to society in general and women in particular, any damage is a benefit to society.
Makes them look like fools whose religion isn't really good for anything.
And that's a truth that needs to get out!

Yes..
Also, have the accounts in question been conclusively linked to him?.