• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Australia is getting a new Prime Minister

Australia has a deep state?

Not sure what you mean, but I don't think anything as sophisticated/absurd as a deep state. More along the lines of lazy talking points, particularly when it's with regards to foreign policy.
 

The illegal mass migrants are not being 'imprisoned' in any gulags. They are being housed - for free, mind you! - in offshore camps. They are free to go home where they belong anytime they want. The problem is that they want to enter Australia.
I guess this Patrick Stokes fellow supports unlimited mass migration from places like Afghanistan and Pakistan. I think this is a far better strategy:
5568.jpg
 
Tell us more about the refugees, Derec. What's it like for them? What's life like for children born there? What do you make of the suicides and medical cases that were ignored? Are they human to you at all? Or just figments representing not people but your own dogma?

- - - Updated - - -

By the way, Derec, you should see Sacrifice, the new special from Derren Brown. He uses his skills and talents to turn a bigot into a human being who would take a bullet for an immigrant.
 
The illegal mass migrants are not being 'imprisoned' in any gulags. They are being housed - for free, mind you! - in offshore camps. They are free to go home where they belong anytime they want.

Really? How are they able to do that? Just buy a first class plane ticket?

They are being 'housed' in conditions that are driving them to kill themselves, rather than endure them any longer. Does that sound to you like the behaviour of people who are free to go anywhere else?

Perhaps they are just committing suicide to make the right wing look bad. That's just the kind of sneaky trick they would pull, right?

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/nauru-asylum-seeker-conditions-abuse-sexual-harassment-filthy-tents/news-story/58a82f1cf914689fcac1284c781e2831
 
The illegal mass migrants are not being 'imprisoned' in any gulags. They are being housed - for free, mind you! - in offshore camps. They are free to go home where they belong anytime they want.

Really? How are they able to do that? Just buy a first class plane ticket?

They are being 'housed' in conditions that are driving them to kill themselves, rather than endure them any longer. Does that sound to you like the behaviour of people who are free to go anywhere else?

Perhaps they are just committing suicide to make the right wing look bad. That's just the kind of sneaky trick they would pull, right?

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/nauru-asylum-seeker-conditions-abuse-sexual-harassment-filthy-tents/news-story/58a82f1cf914689fcac1284c781e2831

Looks like a money making scam. A criminal organization abusing a bunch of people and charging the Australian taxpayers for doing pretty much nothing except making the conditions terrible.

The Australian government spent $415 million on its Nauru operations in 2014/15 — about $350,000 for each person held on the island.
 
The illegal mass migrants are not being 'imprisoned' in any gulags. They are being housed - for free, mind you! - in offshore camps. They are free to go home where they belong anytime they want.

Really? How are they able to do that? Just buy a first class plane ticket?

They are being 'housed' in conditions that are driving them to kill themselves, rather than endure them any longer. Does that sound to you like the behaviour of people who are free to go anywhere else?

Perhaps they are just committing suicide to make the right wing look bad. That's just the kind of sneaky trick they would pull, right?

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/nauru-asylum-seeker-conditions-abuse-sexual-harassment-filthy-tents/news-story/58a82f1cf914689fcac1284c781e2831

Yep. Refugees with no resources or freedom to go anywhere are just as bad as the conscienceless scum who hold them there.
 
Looks like a money making scam. A criminal organization abusing a bunch of people and charging the Australian taxpayers for doing pretty much nothing except making the conditions terrible.

The Australian government spent $415 million on its Nauru operations in 2014/15 — about $350,000 for each person held on the island.

Yup. And while people are getting rich off it, there will always be someone trying to keep the vile system in place.
 
Really? How are they able to do that? Just buy a first class plane ticket?
I would suggest the same way they got there. They managed to get there in the first place, so why can't they go back the same way?
Ok, ok, maybe Australia can pay for charter flights back to Kabul or Islamabad. Is that a good compromise?

They are being 'housed' in conditions that are driving them to kill themselves, rather than endure them any longer. Does that sound to you like the behaviour of people who are free to go anywhere else?
So what is your solution? Just let them all in? That would lead to many new migrants leaving their countries to take advantage of the changed policies.
Same as what happened in Europe. For example Afghans started flooding toward Europe not in the 1990s when there was a civil war in the country, and not in 2002 when US invaded, but in 2015 when Merkel open the floodgates to unrestricted migration.
It's not just about the people currently in these camps. It's about deterrence, and about the message being sent to millions of potential migrants that the borders are open again.

Perhaps they are just committing suicide to make the right wing look bad. That's just the kind of sneaky trick they would pull, right?
I don't know why they commit suicide. Maybe they are just nuts. Better they kill themselves on Nauru then go on stabbing sprees in Australian cities like many Afghans are doing across Europe. Btw, there was one Afghan that got deported from Germany that killed himself back home in Kabul. I guess to you that means that Germany should not be deporting any Afghans.
 
Again, how would they do that, even if they wanted to?

1. They got there somehow. If Nauru is really that bad, why aren't they using the same means to go back.
2. In Europe they charter planes for deportees. Australia could do the same. Charter a few planes to Kabul and Islamabad and wherever else these people are from.
 
That is insane, Derec. You have allowed your mind to be eaten up by fear mongering and zealotry. They are human beings who fled hardship and danger. WTF is wrong with you?
 
Tell us more about the refugees, Derec. What's it like for them?
Vast majority of these people are not refugees, but economic migrants.
What's life like for children born there?
Why are they having children in the first place if conditions are that bad?
What do you make of the suicides and medical cases that were ignored? Are they human to you at all? Or just figments representing not people but your own dogma?
Medical cases should not have been ignored. However, the solution is not to let all these mass migrants in. The success of the Australian policy is that by blocking boats they removed the incentives for migrants to come and they stopped coming. Europe did the opposite. They allowed so-called NGOs (really migrant smugglers) to pick up migrants 12 miles off the coasts of Tunisia and Libya and bring them all to European ports. Of course, that fuels more and more migration because the word spreads. If they were brought back to where they took off from the word of futility of these crossings would spread too and they would cease.
I do not think people should be mistreated - it would be best to just send them back home - but I do not think Australia nor any other country should create a pull factor for mass migration either.

By the way, Derec, you should see Sacrifice, the new special from Derren Brown. He uses his skills and talents to turn a bigot into a human being who would take a bullet for an immigrant.
Ah, the leftist Newspeak. Anybody who is against unrestricted mass migration from the 3rd World is dubbed a "bigot" ...
 
Again, how would they do that, even if they wanted to?

1. They got there somehow. If Nauru is really that bad, why aren't they using the same means to go back.
Because the boats were literally burned. And they are in a locked compound surrounded by razor wire topped fences and armed guards.

Seriously, if you don't know this, you are unqualified to have an opinion.
2. In Europe they charter planes for deportees. Australia could do the same. Charter a few planes to Kabul and Islamabad and wherever else these people are from.

Sure. You can ask the federal government why they haven't done that, if it's so easy.

Perhaps it only looks easy to someone who hasn't bothered to find out what the real situation is, because his bigotry is sufficient basis for determining the best solution to every problem. Perhaps reality isn't that simple.
 
That is insane, Derec. You have allowed your mind to be eaten up by fear mongering and zealotry. They are human beings who fled hardship and danger. WTF is wrong with you?

So developed countries should open their borders to unlimited numbers of them?
And by the way, how many of these migrants is China taking in? Saudi Arabia? South Korea? Japan?
Why are only US, Europe, Australia and Canada supposed to take countless millions of mass migrants?
 
Back
Top Bottom