Underseer
Contributor
Argentina dominated Belgium in possession, shots on goal, turnovers, etc. It was... humbling to watch Argentina do to Belgium what Belgium did to us.
They were also good at setting the offside trap.Argentina dominated Belgium in possession, shots on goal, turnovers, etc. It was... humbling to watch Argentina do to Belgium what Belgium did to us.
They were also good at setting the offside trap.Argentina dominated Belgium in possession, shots on goal, turnovers, etc. It was... humbling to watch Argentina do to Belgium what Belgium did to us.
I have tried hard to understand this referee and my only explanation left is that this poor man was just not able enough to handle a game like this. Not just out of his depth but snorkeling straight down the Mariana trench.
He was not allowing tough play nor was he trying to control a violent match and certainly he was not favoring one side he was just utterly random. With no logic, no plan and no heuristic they might as well have used one of those wacky waving inflatable arm flailing tube men with a randomized whistle.
Oh well. There can only be one (said Connor McLeod), and everyone else must go home. Not that I expected CR or anyone from Concacaf to beat the clockwork orange (or beat Brazil or Germany for that matter). It was a good run while it lasted.
I cheered for Los Ticos. They played with passion throughout all their games. They are part of the represented nations where it seems like people are born with a "soccer" marker in their genes. To compare with those represented nations where their teams are "machine like" or clinical. All those teams also bring along their cultural blue prints on the field.
Oh well. There can only be one (said Connor McLeod), and everyone else must go home. Not that I expected CR or anyone from Concacaf to beat the clockwork orange (or beat Brazil or Germany for that matter). It was a good run while it lasted.
Not taking cheap shots about how Americans "understand " soccer here but " the US cliche of what Americans think of football", as I finally took the time to watch France/Germany which I had taped as I was at work, that was my thought too. I also wondered why Deschamps kept Giroud on the bench until the last 5 minutes when I felt that Valbuena had been under performing already in the first half. Something was off with Valbuena.I was on fire for the Round of 16, 7 of 8. Quarterfinals 1 of 4. I had Columbia via penalties. France v Germany was the US cliche of what Americans think of football.
As long as they are the #1 team globally, they can not be the #1 favorite. That is the problem with these so called prediction levels.FiveThirtyEight recalculates Brazil's odds:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-neymars-injury-affects-brazils-chances-at-the-world-cup/
Still has them as the favourites.
I find it hard to think Brazil has a chance without Neymar. They were relying way too much on him. Which really does suck for Brazil, as he was taken out by a Columbian defender. Oddly enough, Suarez banned four months from football for a biting incident which caused little damage (yes third time and he deserves a suspension), but nothing for the cracked vertebrae (which could have been a career ending injury).Semifinal #1, Brazil-Germany, is a few hours away. A lot of uncertainty about this one--probably the safest expectation is that it will definitely be a very physical match.
Biting is not part of the game in any way and so it can only be classified as unsportsmanlike behavior. And as you said, he has done it before.Oddly enough, Suarez banned four months from football for a biting incident which caused little damage (yes third time and he deserves a suspension), but nothing for the cracked vertebrae (which could have been a career ending injury).
Well then.