TSwizzle
I am unburdened by what has been.
I know I'm probably wasting my time asking you this, but why do you reject the science after so many years of evidence?This is just silly. Nobody denies the earth's climate changes.Since it's not as obvious in the US, as it is in poor countries, it's understandable that a very small percentage of Americans are climate change denialists.
The propaganda has been relentless that we are on the verge of apocalyptic weather, irreversible tipping points and catastrophe for years. None of these predictions have ever materialized. Most of these "actual scientists" are not scientists at all, they are activists promoting an agenda. And scientists never get anything wrong?Oh my. The "propaganda" from actual scientists say that climate change is happening today.
I don't reject "the science" or "the evidence" per se. I reject that a minor, imperceptible increase in average temperature is going to cause a "climate breakdown" or "apocalypse" or whatever. "The science" (which most often is some bullshit study conducted by activists) predicts these earth shattering events on a regular basis and they have all failed to materialize.
The hell it is. The propaganda says it is but this is false. I'll give you an often touted example, California wildfires. Every year we have wildfires, every year we are told this is because "climate change". This is false. Wildfires are a natural and necessary phenomenon that has occurred for centuries. We are told that the increase in wildfires is due to "climate change". False. Most California wildfires are down to human interaction, downed powerlines, arson etc.I can sort of see why some people doubted 10 or 20 years ago, but the evidence of catastrophic changes is now beginning to become very obvious. Perhaps that's an understatement.
Here we go, anyone that questions the narrative or the agenda is a "denialist/heretic". It really is a religion for you people.Nobody is happy about what's going on. It can be easy to deny things that are difficult to accept.
It's just so obvious that human activity has had a negative impact on our habitat,
A "negative impact on our habitat"? So you are moving the discussion away from "climate change"? Have at it.
And, where in the world do you get the idea that the climate scientists aren't real scientists? Did you read this in some far right propaganda source?
Yes, anytime someone disagrees with you it's because they are a "right wing qanon" deviant.
Anyway.....I'm not expecting an answer, just wanted to point out how it feels to read some of your posts.
Yeah, move along.