So? Why do you even care what Al Gore thinks of himself?
It’s clear you brought up his name for a reason. And that reason is not relevant to actual climate science. So, it would seem you are more interested in political arguments than scientific ones.
Al Gore is dangerously ignorant and a hypocrite and for some odd reason he carries a lot of weight in this "climate apocalypse" bullshit. He even opened the COP27 meeting. He stands there wagging his finger and scolding people about their sins against the climate.
It’s clear you brought up his name for a reason. And that reason is not relevant to actual climate science. So, it would seem you are more interested in political arguments than scientific ones.
It’s clear you brought up his name for a reason. And that reason is not relevant to actual climate science. So, it would seem you are more interested in political arguments than scientific ones.
You aren't really making an argument politically or scientifically, so please don't fool yourself. You are just whining. And constantly telling us the weather in your portion of California.
Almost 8,000 shootings in US cities in recent years were attributable to unseasonably warm temperatures, according to a new study. The researchers said the work suggested the climate crisis could be contributing to increased gun violence by pushing temperatures beyond the normal ranges. The scientists said the knowledge that unusually warm temperatures were linked to an increase in shooting incidents could enable community prevention measures to be targeted towards hotter days. “We saw a really consistent overall relationship between temperature and a higher risk of shootings,” said Dr Vivian Lyons, at the University of Washington, Seattle, who led the research. “There is a concern I have, after the study, that firearm-related violence will rise as climate change continues.”
Almost 8,000 shootings in US cities in recent years were attributable to unseasonably warm temperatures, according to a new study. The researchers said the work suggested the climate crisis could be contributing to increased gun violence by pushing temperatures beyond the normal ranges. The scientists said the knowledge that unusually warm temperatures were linked to an increase in shooting incidents could enable community prevention measures to be targeted towards hotter days. “We saw a really consistent overall relationship between temperature and a higher risk of shootings,” said Dr Vivian Lyons, at the University of Washington, Seattle, who led the research. “There is a concern I have, after the study, that firearm-related violence will rise as climate change continues.”
It might seem that way. But fortunately IIDB has the precious climatologist T. Swizzle PhD who has assured us repeatedly that Santa Monica has special status as the climate bellwether. The bellwether is 62°F today and was 74°F last Sunday. In December! Thus we know, thanks to Dr. Swizzle, that the storm to the East is just an aberration.
Sometime back you falsely stated that all climate changes predictions stretching back decades were false. I provided the documentation that they were all true, and in fact somewhat understated. Were you planning to retract and apologize for your egregiously false claim?
Don't remember if I posted this before. A rely to an email I sent to UW climate science center.
Thanks for reaching out! Are you wondering about the heat released from human uses of energy, like power plants, industry, etc? If so, here’s a quick calculation of the effect of that compared wit h the increase in CO2 and other greenhouse gases.
The current primary energy usage worldwide is around 600 EJ/yr, which is a little less than 20 TW. All of this is eventually dissipated into heat.
Explore data from the Statistical Review of World Energy online or download the app to your tablet or smartphone
www.bp.com
The increased heat trapping from CO2 currently amounts to around 2.16 W/m2, which is around 1100 TW (over the 510 trillion square meters of Earth’s surface).
You did post it; I confirmed the result with a back-of-the-envelope calculation.
(It is NOT that I mistrusted you or your professor. I just had an extra envelope and a few minutes' time.)
It does seem remarkable that when we get 3 Joules by burning gas, with only 1 Joule spent usefully in my electric heater, the Earth warms by another 100+ Joules due to the CO2 injected into the atmosphere.
Obviously I didn't do it for Mr. Swizzle. I did it for my own amusement — Maybe I was in a funny mood.
I was rather startled that the answer worked out to 5 Hiroshima bombs per second, exactly as in the headline.
If the use of "Hiroshimas" as an energy unit is politically incorrect, the power of the ocean's heat rise can also be expressed as 2.3·1039 electron-Volts per fortnight. I don't know how to calculate the power of right-wing ignorance. Is it in about the same ballpark?
Don't remember if I posted this before. A rely to an email I sent to UW climate science center.
Thanks for reaching out! Are you wondering about the heat released from human uses of energy, like power plants, industry, etc? If so, here’s a quick calculation of the effect of that compared wit h the increase in CO2 and other greenhouse gases.
The current primary energy usage worldwide is around 600 EJ/yr, which is a little less than 20 TW. All of this is eventually dissipated into heat.
Explore data from the Statistical Review of World Energy online or download the app to your tablet or smartphone
www.bp.com
The increased heat trapping from CO2 currently amounts to around 2.16 W/m2, which is around 1100 TW (over the 510 trillion square meters of Earth’s surface).
Currently the amount of heat in the Venetian atmosphere caused by lifeforms is 0. That huge fusion reaction at the center of our solar system is the main power source in the area.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.