• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Cop Shoot Unarmed Man Crawling From Wreckage Of His Vehicle - No Charges

The article doesn't mention his race so I assume he was white - I thought only black people get shot by police ...
Also we might have ourselves the elusive white dindu, by omission at least, since you failed to mention that he was driving drunk and fleeing from the police when he crashed his car, killing his wife. Doesn't justify the shooting, but even without it he'd be facing DUI and manslaughter charges.
 
The article doesn't mention his race so I assume he was white - I thought only black people get shot by police ...
Also we might have ourselves the elusive white dindu, by omission at least, since you failed to mention that he was driving drunk and fleeing from the police when he crashed his car, killing his wife. Doesn't justify the shooting, but even without it he'd be facing DUI and manslaughter charges.
Edited response.

I almost never watch vids of people getting killed, but after having just watched this, I'm actually sickened by your post. Doesn't justify the shooting? It was a fucking homicide, and potentially 1st degree murder.
 
Everything is messed up here. Policeman was stalking drunks, drunk driving, no seat belts, finishing off accident victims.
 
The article doesn't mention his race so I assume he was white - I thought only black people get shot by police ...
Also we might have ourselves the elusive white dindu, by omission at least, since you failed to mention that he was driving drunk and fleeing from the police when he crashed his car, killing his wife. Doesn't justify the shooting, but even without it he'd be facing DUI and manslaughter charges.
Edited response.

I almost never watch vids of people getting killed, but after having just watched this, I'm actually sickened by your post. Doesn't justify the shooting? It was a fucking homicide, and potentially 1st degree murder.
Are you confused? Or am I? Is the homicide victim (if there is a homicide victim) male or female?
 
Are you confused? Or am I? Is the homicide victim (if there is a homicide victim) male or female?
Jimmy is. And she if female. The guy who was shot survived. He is paralyzed, but he survived.
 
Edited response.
I really wonder what the original said ...
I almost never watch vids of people getting killed, but after having just watched this, I'm actually sickened by your post. Doesn't justify the shooting? It was a fucking homicide, and potentially 1st degree murder.
The only homicide here is Thomas accidentally killing his wife. He himself survived. And I don't see why you are sickened when I agreed that the shooting wasn't justified.
 
Everything is messed up here.
Including some people's reading comprehension. :)
Policeman was stalking drunks,
Stalking drunks? Where do you get that from?
A better article than the one in the OP:
Paradise officer faces no criminal charges in shooting
KRCR said:
The investigation established that Feaster was on patrol off the Skyway near the Canteena sports bar around midnight on November 26 when he noticed a Toyota 4Runner drive by at a high rate of speed and without headlights south on the Skyway.

Video from the officer's dash-cam showed Feaster follow the the SUV, which was traveling between 50-60 mph. After turning east on Pearson Road, the SUV hit a median approximately 100 yards past the Pearson Road's intersection with Black Olive Drive and overturn.
Doesn't sound much like "stalking" to me.

finishing off accident victims.
The article also gives reasons why the shooting was deemed accidental.
KRCR said:
According to the report, Feaster thought Thomas could be trying to escape from a potential felony vehicular manslaughter incident. He pulled his .45 caliber semi-automatic piston to cover Thomas.

A second later, the gun discharged once, hit Thomas in the neck, who fell back into the SUV.

Feaster told the responding officers that night that he did not intentionally fire his weapon. Normally, officers are trained to fire two shots when they intentionally fire their sidearms, but since there was no second shot it was an additional factor in leading investigators to believe Feaster's claim that the shot was unintended.

The report noted that since no one was killed, investigators needed only to examine those penal code sections dealing with the discharge of a firearm. They determined that the gun was not fired "willfully" or "under circumstances in which the display of the gun was unreasonable." Thus, investigators determined that there was no criminal negligence.
Now I think he should have been charged with something (especially since he tried to cover it up), but current law seems to preclude that under these circumstances. He still faces disciplinary action by the department though.
 
Last edited:
I really wonder what the original said ...
I almost never watch vids of people getting killed, but after having just watched this, I'm actually sickened by your post. Doesn't justify the shooting? It was a fucking homicide, and potentially 1st degree murder.
The only homicide here is Thomas accidentally killing his wife. He himself survived. And I don't see why you are sickened when I agreed that the shooting wasn't justified.

Yeah, my bet was he mistakenly thought the cop killed who he shot. I base that on his outrage towards you. Either that or more unlikely he found the shooting justified since the guy he shot just killed his wife. At any rate, he is upset because of how he perceived your tone about the shooting. It's not that he disagrees with you about the shooting being unjustified. It has the feel of being minimized. He will never walk again, but then again, neither will his wife. His mother in law might not disagree with me, but she'll sure as shit be a bit ticked off by my saying it.
 
Sounds like a guy who doesn't understand you don't put your finger on the trigger until you've decided to fire and the gun is on target.
 
Everything is messed up here. Policeman was stalking drunks, drunk driving, no seat belts, finishing off accident victims.
Why shouldn't a cop sit outside a bar waiting for drunks to get behind the wheel?

Sounds like a guy who doesn't understand you don't put your finger on the trigger until you've decided to fire and the gun is on target.
Exactly. Every cop knows to keep his finger outside the trigger guard until he's ready to fire.
 
Why shouldn't a cop sit outside a bar waiting for drunks to get behind the wheel?

Sounds like a guy who doesn't understand you don't put your finger on the trigger until you've decided to fire and the gun is on target.
Exactly. Every cop knows to keep his finger outside the trigger guard until he's ready to fire.

What does Loren mean "sounds like?" I sound to me like the guy is unfit to be a cop and he made a bad situation much worse regardless of what you think about drunk driving.:rolleyes:
 
Why shouldn't a cop sit outside a bar waiting for drunks to get behind the wheel?

Sounds like a guy who doesn't understand you don't put your finger on the trigger until you've decided to fire and the gun is on target.
Exactly. Every cop knows to keep his finger outside the trigger guard until he's ready to fire.

Cop service weapons have the trigger pull effort set very high to discourage accidental trigger pull. I don't see how this could be accidental.
 
The "accidental discharge" defense would have little more credibility if the officer had reported there was a man in the vehicle with a gunshot wound.
 
The "accidental discharge" defense would have little more credibility if the officer had reported there was a man in the vehicle with a gunshot wound.

After the man was shot, I did not see the cops scurrying to get medical attention to the people in the car. They just walked around casually. I did not see sufficient activity from them as FIRST RESPONDERS. I just saw a jackass with a gun. I know the guy in the car was WRONG. The jackass with the gun was even MORE WRONG.
 
Why shouldn't a cop sit outside a bar waiting for drunks to get behind the wheel?


Exactly. Every cop knows to keep his finger outside the trigger guard until he's ready to fire.

What does Loren mean "sounds like?" I sound to me like the guy is unfit to be a cop and he made a bad situation much worse regardless of what you think about drunk driving.:rolleyes:
From the video, I see the cop's actions as deliberate. But this is all we have to judge. The story can not be relied upon. The writer shot (or perhaps accidentally discharged) his credibility when he made this comment:

Officer Feaster then gets out of his vehicle, gun drawn, and as Thomas attempts to get out of the vehicle, in a likely attempt to check on his wife, the cop shoots him in the neck.
Matt Agorist should not make such an assumption.

Beyond that, regardless of what I think about drunk driving? Is there a pro-drunk driving camp I'm unaware of?
 
I won't shed a tear the next time a cop is murdered if this keeps up.

That cop is a good candidate for a Star Chamber decision.
 
If there was only one shot fired, why am I seeing two successive and distinct blasts of smoke coming from the gun in the video? I can imagine that one blast might come from the muzzle and the other from the ejecting shell, but I didn't think there would be so much time delay between the two.

Regardless if it was one shot or two, His actions look extremely deliberate. This is another example of pervasive violent police overreach and corruption.
 
The "accidental discharge" defense would have little more credibility if the officer had reported there was a man in the vehicle with a gunshot wound.

After the man was shot, I did not see the cops scurrying to get medical attention to the people in the car. They just walked around casually. I did not see sufficient activity from them as FIRST RESPONDERS. I just saw a jackass with a gun. I know the guy in the car was WRONG. The jackass with the gun was even MORE WRONG.
That's because there were not people in the car. Recall, one went weeeeee, and will never walk again--because she's dead.
 
Back
Top Bottom