I think it varies from individual to individual. Some women are crazy. Some men are crazy. Some women are too religious. So are some men. Why should women get a pass?
Not what I was saying. But please, feel free to back up your point by showing me examples of you calling men crazy or too religious.
And I think on average it is true that women tend to be more emotional than men. Again, that would be means only, with high degree of variance as to where individuals land. But I also think leaders, men or women, that are too emotional can be detrimental to their countries.
Of course you are entitled to your opinion. Just as I am entitled to point out that you and some others are fond of terming women crazy or overly emotional or religious or whatever you think will make them seem less reliable. With no particular evidence of such and no real standards except that she be female.
Being overly emotional is bad regardless of the gender. Again, you do not want certain adjectives to be used for women even if applicable. Why?
Misrepresenting me again. Why?
Which would be still different than if you or someone else suggested that she's deliberately capitalizing on her looks or her sexuality.
And if she were, would it be "misogynist" to point it out? By the way, that applies to Kamala Harris when she fucked Willie Brown for career advancement. And yet she has the gall to look down on honest sex workers.
OK, so now here's where you try to shift focus to who another woman dated.....25 years ago? FFS, Derec. Do you think that Brown also fucked Pelosi, Feinstein and Newsom, whose careers he also helped? FFS, Derec, I've volunteered for campaigns, introduced people who were running to others who might donate and who would be in a position to help them. I wasn't fucking any of them.
The fact that you cannot separate a woman dating anyone from prostitution speaks volumes about about you and your world view.
I really don't see it. You say smart. But how can anybody smart with an economics degree embrace socialism? And despite that economics degree she was waiting tables before she won her congress seat. Hmm.
Hopefully, you don't let waitstaff at the eateries you frequent know how little you think of their intelligence...They have the power to spit in your food before serving it to you, you know. Yep: even at McDonald's.
I'm sure you don't see her as smart. She's a woman. How smart could she be?
Had much more to do with the perception that they were/are out of touch rich guys who spend money on trivial things...
That is part of it too, but it focused on appearance: weight, hair, clothing. And yet if anybody comments on a female politician's appearance they get accused of "misogyny". Double standards again.
Commenting on a man's looks is rarely misogyny.
Trump is horribly criticized for his hair but more that it seems like a ridiculous failure to accept reality with grace and just get on with life...
Again, it's a comment about his appearance that you think is perfectly fine, because it is addressed at a man. Talking about Bernie's crazy, unruly hair was considered fine too. But if anybody dared make fun of Hillary's hair, I am sure you'd flip out ...
Who said I think it's fine to comment on Donald Trump's appearance or hairstyle? Actually, I find it very frustrating because there are so many more substantive things that need to be criticized. Speaking about his ridiculous hair or spray tan or stupidly long ties is just a distraction from the genuine harm he is doing on a daily basis.
How about you find me a quote of you referring to any white male as having crazy eyes or something similar and I'll agree that I wasn't fair.
There is white female Michelle Bachmann for one. That's 50% of your criteria right there. And while I don't recall seeing any male politicians with crazy eyes, I am sure I have made fun of Dennis Kucinich's ears back in the day. That's just as good, surely.
So, you can't do it. I thought not.
I think she is an expressive person and given a continuous stream of images, it is impossible not to find some that are unflattering. I also think she gives fewer shits about how she looks than does the media.
That explains her expensive wardrobe I am sure ...
The clothes she wore for a photo shoot? lololol. You know she wasn't given those clothes, right? And you realize that she's young and pretty and wears clothes well, making bad stuff look good plus she's not dumb and certainly knows how to shop. Plus NYC is a long ways away from strip malls in GA.
I've never worn clothes well, not even when I was very thin. On the other hand, I know people who can put on...practically a burlap bag and make it look expensive. She's like that.
Can you think of any white male who you would term as taking 'crazy eyes' photos? Or that you would deem overly excited during interviews?
If their eyes did what AOC's were doing in those photos, I surely would. Can you think of one to whom that applies?
