• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Elon Musk's CEO-Dictator Playbook

NOw the smartest man in the world is begging air traffic controllers that have retired to come back. Federal law requires them to retire at age 56...for safety reasons. You know...how the older you get the harder it is to see your smartphone screen...yeah...let's get that back behind a radar screen.

 
If you need to ask what people did, you might not be in a good position to determine their value as a worker.
Yeah. Any such e-mail is inherently showing your ineptitude as a boss. And if it didn't come from someone close up my command chain I would assume it was a social engineering attack.
That actually is a good point and something I hadn't thought of. If I received that from an email claiming to be head of the company, I would have immediately hit the phishing icon and reported it to IT. He doesn't send emails like that.
When the first "fork in the road" email arrived in government employees inboxes, it basically got flagged as spam. Agencies had to send out other emails to convince the employees that it was a real email and not spam.
 
If you need to ask what people did, you might not be in a good position to determine their value as a worker.
Yeah. Any such e-mail is inherently showing your ineptitude as a boss. And if it didn't come from someone close up my command chain I would assume it was a social engineering attack.
That actually is a good point and something I hadn't thought of. If I received that from an email claiming to be head of the company, I would have immediately hit the phishing icon and reported it to IT. He doesn't send emails like that.
When the first "fork in the road" email arrived in government employees inboxes, it basically got flagged as spam. Agencies had to send out other emails to convince the employees that it was a real email and not spam.
On what basis is it a "real" email? What lawful authority does the sender have?
 
If you need to ask what people did, you might not be in a good position to determine their value as a worker.
Yeah. Any such e-mail is inherently showing your ineptitude as a boss. And if it didn't come from someone close up my command chain I would assume it was a social engineering attack.
That actually is a good point and something I hadn't thought of. If I received that from an email claiming to be head of the company, I would have immediately hit the phishing icon and reported it to IT. He doesn't send emails like that.
When the first "fork in the road" email arrived in government employees inboxes, it basically got flagged as spam. Agencies had to send out other emails to convince the employees that it was a real email and not spam.
On what basis is it a "real" email? What lawful authority does the sender have?
I don’t know but I do know that some federal workers were told by their supervisors to not treat the email as spam and to take it seriously.
 
That's more or less what a certain insitution of my acquaintance may have been instructed to do about a certain letter that got sent to all the schools. Random letters on no kind of letterhead are not how policies are meant to be communicated between the federal government and state-run institutions, and we aren't to treat it as such, I imagine our instructions might have been.

But we're all on shaky legal ground, this administration and their victims alike. The President is abusing the powers given to him, but those powers are not wholly illusory.
 
But we're all on shaky legal ground, this administration and their victims alike. The President is abusing the powers given to him, but those powers are not illusory.
They are if you can find a lawyer who says they are.

Until someone finds a judge to say they aren't.

Then it comes down to who gets the highest court to decide in their favour.

Trump's powers are theoretically those granted to him by the constitution. But in practice they are those granted to him by the judiciary, and he has good reason to expect the support of the Supreme Court.

Musk's powers are those granted by the constitution (ie, none at all), plus those granted to him by Trump (see above).
 
The thing is, Trump is adept at exceeding the law in ways that have not yet been specifically defined as breaking it, and encouraging others to do the same. The arguments lawyers will make either for or against his actions will not be groundless. The checks on the often undefined and unclearly bounded powers of the president are meant to be his own conscience and diligence, or if those fail, the power of the Congress to impeach. As he and we know they will not.
 
But as you said this has proven to work well for corporate raiders who are only interested in net utility versus expense. At this point, pretty much exactly the same thing the US taxpayer should want as well. If the process did not truly generate value they would not continue to do this.
You do realize the companies corporate raiders acquire usually fail, right?
This is so important.
Get control, loot the assets, cut it loose to go bankrupt. It's a useful and common strategy.

I believe that the Teaparty did exactly that to the GOP in the aftermath of the disastrous Bush II administration.
Tom
Disagree. I believe the "Tea Party" was a false flag meant to draw in those who disagreed with what the Republicans had become. They didn't take over because it was an inside job in the first place.
 
But we're all on shaky legal ground, this administration and their victims alike. The President is abusing the powers given to him, but those powers are not illusory.
They are if you can find a lawyer who says they are.

Until someone finds a judge to say they aren't.

Then it comes down to who gets the highest court to decide in their favour.

Trump's powers are theoretically those granted to him by the constitution. But in practice they are those granted to him by the judiciary, and he has good reason to expect the support of the Supreme Court.

Musk's powers are those granted by the constitution (ie, none at all), plus those granted to him by Trump (see above).
What you are missing is the executive has all the guns. Control that and the checks and balances become mere words.
 

He is such a fucking braindead moron.

March 16 (Reuters) - The Kremlin may have ignored billionaire Elon Musk challenging President Vladimir Putin to a fight over Russia's invasion of Ukraine, but several Russian officials have stepped in to defend their leader by mocking Musk online.

The eccentric Tesla Inc CEO on Monday tweeted: "I hereby challenge Vladimir Putin to single combat", with Ukraine as the stakes.

Dmitry Rogozin, head of Russia's space agency who in the past had disparaged Musk as a rival space rocket maker, replied the same day by citing a poem referring to a "young little devil, too weak to compete with me".
 
Last edited:

He is such a fucking braindead moron.

March 16 (Reuters) - The Kremlin may have ignored billionaire Elon Musk challenging President Vladimir Putin to a fight over Russia's invasion of Ukraine, but several Russian officials have stepped in to defend their leader by mocking Musk online.

The eccentric Tesla Inc CEO on Monday tweeted: "I hereby challenge Vladimir Putin to single combat", with Ukraine as the stakes.

Dmitry Rogozin, head of Russia's space agency who in the past had disparaged Musk as a rival space rocket maker, replied the same day by citing a poem referring to a "young little devil, too weak to compete with me".
I'd buy that for a dollar.
 

He is such a fucking braindead moron.

March 16 (Reuters) - The Kremlin may have ignored billionaire Elon Musk challenging President Vladimir Putin to a fight over Russia's invasion of Ukraine, but several Russian officials have stepped in to defend their leader by mocking Musk online.

The eccentric Tesla Inc CEO on Monday tweeted: "I hereby challenge Vladimir Putin to single combat", with Ukraine as the stakes.

Dmitry Rogozin, head of Russia's space agency who in the past had disparaged Musk as a rival space rocket maker, replied the same day by citing a poem referring to a "young little devil, too weak to compete with me".
Does Leon know that Vlad has killed a man
 
But as you said this has proven to work well for corporate raiders who are only interested in net utility versus expense. At this point, pretty much exactly the same thing the US taxpayer should want as well. If the process did not truly generate value they would not continue to do this.
You do realize the companies corporate raiders acquire usually fail, right?
This is so important.
Get control, loot the assets, cut it loose to go bankrupt. It's a useful and common strategy.

I believe that the Teaparty did exactly that to the GOP in the aftermath of the disastrous Bush II administration.
Tom
Disagree. I believe the "Tea Party" was a false flag meant to draw in those who disagreed with what the Republicans had become. They didn't take over because it was an inside job in the first place.
It may not have started that way but it was quickly made into that as soon as Heritage/Hannity got involved.
 
Curtis Yarvin’s Ideas Were Fringe. Now They’re Coursing Through Trump’s Washington.

On the weekend of Donald Trump’s inauguration, the neo-reactionary blogger Curtis Yarvin traveled to Washington, D.C., for the Coronation Ball, a glitzy inaugural gala hosted by the ultraconservative publishing house Passage Press. The gathering, hosted in the ballroom of the Watergate Hotel, was designed to celebrate the ascent of the new conservative counter-elite that has risen to power on the tide of Trump’s reelection — and Yarvin, who has arguably done more than anyone to shape the thinking of that nascent group, was an informal guest of honor.

Even the ball’s name spoke to Yarvin’s outsize influence over the Trumpian right: For over a decade, Yarvin, an ex-computer programmer-turned-blogger, has argued that American democracy is irrevocably broken and ought to be replaced with a monarchy styled after a Silicon Valley tech start-up. According to Yarvin, the time has come to jettison existing democratic institutions and concentrate political power in a single “chief executive” or “dictator.” These ideas — which Yarvin calls “neo-reaction” or “the Dark Enlightenment” — were once confined to the fringes of the internet, but now, with Trump’s reelection, they are finding a newly powerful audience in Washington.

When I called him up recently to talk about the second Trump administration, Yarvin told me that during his trip to Washington, he had exchanged friendly greetings with Vice President JD Vance — who has publicly cited his work — had lunch with Michael Anton, a senior member of Trump’s State Department, and caught up with the “revolutionary vanguard” of young conservatives who grew up reading his blogs and are now entering the new administration.

Yarvin is skeptical that Trump can actually carry out the type of regime change that he envisions, but he told me that there are signs the new administration is serious about concentrating power in the executive branch. We spoke before the Trump administration announced a sweeping freeze on federal aid programs, but he pointed to the coming fight over impoundment as a key test of the new administration’s willingness to push the bounds of executive authority. And he detected a newfound confidence and aggressiveness in Trump’s GOP.

  Curtis Yarvin

Curtis Guy Yarvin (born 1973), also known by the pen name Mencius Moldbug, is an American blogger. He is known, along with philosopher Nick Land, for founding the anti-egalitarian and anti-democratic philosophical movement known as the Dark Enlightenment or neo-reactionary movement (NRx).

In his blog Unqualified Reservations, which he wrote from 2007 to 2014, and in his later newsletter Gray Mirror, which he started in 2020, he argues that American democracy is a failed experiment that should be replaced by an accountable monarchy, similar to the governance structure of corporations. In 2002, Yarvin began work on a personal software project that eventually became the Urbit networked computing platform. In 2013, he co-founded the company Tlon to oversee the Urbit project and helped lead it until 2019.

Yarvin has been described as a "neo-reactionary", "neo-monarchist" and "neo-feudalist" who "sees liberalism as creating a Matrix-like totalitarian system, and who wants to replace American democracy with a sort of techno-monarchy". He has defended the institution of slavery, and has suggested that certain races may be more naturally inclined toward servitude than others. He has claimed that whites have higher IQs than black people, but does not consider himself a white nationalist. He is a critic of US civil rights programs, and has called the civil rights movement a "black-rage industry".

Yarvin has influenced some prominent Silicon Valley investors and Republican politicians, with venture capitalist Peter Thiel described as his "most important connection". Political strategist Steve Bannon has read and admired his work. U.S. Vice President JD Vance "has cited Yarvin as an influence himself. Michael Anton, the State Department Director of Policy Planning during Trump's second presidency, has also discussed Yarvin's ideas. In January 2025, Yarvin attended a Trump inaugural gala in Washington; Politico reported he was "an informal guest of honor" due to his "outsize influence over the Trumpian right.
This is the plan Galaxy Brain is enacting.
 
Curtis Yarvin’s Ideas Were Fringe. Now They’re Coursing Through Trump’s Washington.

On the weekend of Donald Trump’s inauguration, the neo-reactionary blogger Curtis Yarvin traveled to Washington, D.C., for the Coronation Ball, a glitzy inaugural gala hosted by the ultraconservative publishing house Passage Press. The gathering, hosted in the ballroom of the Watergate Hotel, was designed to celebrate the ascent of the new conservative counter-elite that has risen to power on the tide of Trump’s reelection — and Yarvin, who has arguably done more than anyone to shape the thinking of that nascent group, was an informal guest of honor.

Even the ball’s name spoke to Yarvin’s outsize influence over the Trumpian right: For over a decade, Yarvin, an ex-computer programmer-turned-blogger, has argued that American democracy is irrevocably broken and ought to be replaced with a monarchy styled after a Silicon Valley tech start-up. According to Yarvin, the time has come to jettison existing democratic institutions and concentrate political power in a single “chief executive” or “dictator.” These ideas — which Yarvin calls “neo-reaction” or “the Dark Enlightenment” — were once confined to the fringes of the internet, but now, with Trump’s reelection, they are finding a newly powerful audience in Washington.

When I called him up recently to talk about the second Trump administration, Yarvin told me that during his trip to Washington, he had exchanged friendly greetings with Vice President JD Vance — who has publicly cited his work — had lunch with Michael Anton, a senior member of Trump’s State Department, and caught up with the “revolutionary vanguard” of young conservatives who grew up reading his blogs and are now entering the new administration.

Yarvin is skeptical that Trump can actually carry out the type of regime change that he envisions, but he told me that there are signs the new administration is serious about concentrating power in the executive branch. We spoke before the Trump administration announced a sweeping freeze on federal aid programs, but he pointed to the coming fight over impoundment as a key test of the new administration’s willingness to push the bounds of executive authority. And he detected a newfound confidence and aggressiveness in Trump’s GOP.

  Curtis Yarvin

Curtis Guy Yarvin (born 1973), also known by the pen name Mencius Moldbug, is an American blogger. He is known, along with philosopher Nick Land, for founding the anti-egalitarian and anti-democratic philosophical movement known as the Dark Enlightenment or neo-reactionary movement (NRx).

In his blog Unqualified Reservations, which he wrote from 2007 to 2014, and in his later newsletter Gray Mirror, which he started in 2020, he argues that American democracy is a failed experiment that should be replaced by an accountable monarchy, similar to the governance structure of corporations. In 2002, Yarvin began work on a personal software project that eventually became the Urbit networked computing platform. In 2013, he co-founded the company Tlon to oversee the Urbit project and helped lead it until 2019.

Yarvin has been described as a "neo-reactionary", "neo-monarchist" and "neo-feudalist" who "sees liberalism as creating a Matrix-like totalitarian system, and who wants to replace American democracy with a sort of techno-monarchy". He has defended the institution of slavery, and has suggested that certain races may be more naturally inclined toward servitude than others. He has claimed that whites have higher IQs than black people, but does not consider himself a white nationalist. He is a critic of US civil rights programs, and has called the civil rights movement a "black-rage industry".

Yarvin has influenced some prominent Silicon Valley investors and Republican politicians, with venture capitalist Peter Thiel described as his "most important connection". Political strategist Steve Bannon has read and admired his work. U.S. Vice President JD Vance "has cited Yarvin as an influence himself. Michael Anton, the State Department Director of Policy Planning during Trump's second presidency, has also discussed Yarvin's ideas. In January 2025, Yarvin attended a Trump inaugural gala in Washington; Politico reported he was "an informal guest of honor" due to his "outsize influence over the Trumpian right.
This is the plan Galaxy Brain is enacting.

Why do nerds like this think they would get to run the world if they remove the system that they used to build what they have and currently protects them?

All power comes from the barrel of a gun. Whoever controls the violence of society is the "benevolent monarch". Not some tech CEO.

If they tear the country's foundation apart, they'll need a better plan than, "We're tech savvy and should lead instead". Because, drstroying things is easy and can get way out of control. Robespierre didn't keep his head either.
 
It's crazy to look at the trajectory of Yarvin's life. When his real name was first outed, it nearly destroyed and ended his life. Now he haunts the halls of the most powerful governmental house on the planet. The weird thing is that it was never Yarvin that changed, his political views did not evolve in the slightest over the decades, it's the exact same nonsense now. But the country changed. All the old conservatives died, and the techno-monarchists slowly occupied every spot they had held.

There's one thing he's right about, though. It's not just about who has the gun, it's about who everyone believes has the gun. It's the age of spin, and the Alt-Right has all the DJs. They've been playing Ender's Game before most of the key players even realized the game had started.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom