• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Epstein, Kiddies, And Trump. Oh, My

 
 
 
blastula said:
thebeave said:
As far as Trump bragging about walking in on minor girls in their dressing rooms, that was debunked a long time ago. Adults, yes. Minors, no. Still, is that sleazy and uncool? Certainly. But then again, in 2025 a man can freely walk in on naked women & girls in gym locker rooms, etc as long as he says he is a woman and the locker room women have to accept it. link We are changing laws to make it more permissible to behave sleazily like Trump! WTF?:shrug:

Did Trump Admit Going Into Changing Room of Beauty Pageant Contestants?
Click to expand...

Not according to your own link,

But some former Miss Teen USA pageant contestants have accused him of walking into their changing room. In a 2016 Buzzfeed News investigation, nearly half a dozen former contestants of Miss Teen USA claimed that Trump walked in on them changing — some of the girls in those rooms were reportedly 15 years old when it happened.

One incident reportedly occurred in the 1997 Miss Teen USA beauty pageant. Mariah Billado, the former Miss Vermont Teen USA, recalled, "I remember putting on my dress really quick because I was like, 'Oh my god, there's a man in here'." She then remembered Trump saying, "Don't worry, ladies, I've seen it all before." Four other women also alleged that Trump entered the dressing room; eleven contestants that Buzzfeed reached said they did not recall him in the dressing room.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Give thebeave a break. After all,Trump didn’t brag about it!!!
 
G8kvjgGWAAAG1kl
 
I wonder what the right wing reaction would have been if BIden had blacked out the Epstein files.
 
Yeah, he did. He di
laughing dog said:
blastula said:
thebeave said:
As far as Trump bragging about walking in on minor girls in their dressing rooms, that was debunked a long time ago. Adults, yes. Minors, no. Still, is that sleazy and uncool? Certainly. But then again, in 2025 a man can freely walk in on naked women & girls in gym locker rooms, etc as long as he says he is a woman and the locker room women have to accept it. link We are changing laws to make it more permissible to behave sleazily like Trump! WTF?:shrug:

Did Trump Admit Going Into Changing Room of Beauty Pageant Contestants?
Click to expand...

Not according to your own link,

But some former Miss Teen USA pageant contestants have accused him of walking into their changing room. In a 2016 Buzzfeed News investigation, nearly half a dozen former contestants of Miss Teen USA claimed that Trump walked in on them changing — some of the girls in those rooms were reportedly 15 years old when it happened.

One incident reportedly occurred in the 1997 Miss Teen USA beauty pageant. Mariah Billado, the former Miss Vermont Teen USA, recalled, "I remember putting on my dress really quick because I was like, 'Oh my god, there's a man in here'." She then remembered Trump saying, "Don't worry, ladies, I've seen it all before." Four other women also alleged that Trump entered the dressing room; eleven contestants that Buzzfeed reached said they did not recall him in the dressing room.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Give thebeave a break. After all,Trump didn’t brag about it!!
Click to expand...

Yeah he did. He just didn’t specify which particular page ts he had access to because he owned the page ts and he had the right to ‘inspect’ them.
 
clintonjackson.png

You have to wonder why they'd go through this trouble to fake an image of Clinton, as well as go through the trouble of blacking out other files.
 
GenesisNemesis said:
View attachment 53074

You have to wonder why they'd go through this trouble to fake an image of Clinton, as well as go through the trouble of blacking out other files.
Click to expand...
Every time I see the picture of the right I get a shiver of discontentment. Two (2) adult (?) creepy men.
 
Toni said:
GenesisNemesis said:
View attachment 53074

You have to wonder why they'd go through this trouble to fake an image of Clinton, as well as go through the trouble of blacking out other files.
Click to expand...
You really don't.
Click to expand...
It just ends up greatly diminishing their credibility, of course MAGA doesn't care about credibility though. It's just that if I knew someone was guilty and had evidence, wouldn't really make sense to fake that evidence. And I'm not sure it can be said right now that Clinton can't be suspected of anything, but we can't know if he's actually guilty, due to the fraudulent evidence (not going to make sense to right wingers). But anyway they botched their own hit job, on what should be a simple case to prove, and it's hilarious.
 
Last edited:
GenesisNemesis said:
View attachment 53074

You have to wonder why they'd go through this trouble to fake an image of Clinton, as well as go through the trouble of blacking out other files.
Click to expand...
Something is not right here. Those are two different photos (taken a few seconds apart), either by the same photographer (Jonathan Exley) or by another photographer co-located with him. Given the drastic lighting and zoom level differences between the two photos I would lean towards it being two different photographers at the 12/19/03 photo op. The right hand photo is indeed a Getty Images photo per the watermark, as you can see here. I checked to see if Getty had the left side photo in its collection, but came up empty handed. You're welcome to search Getty yourself, but it lacks the Getty Images watermark, so I don't think you'll find it. Or perhaps it was also taken by Jonathan Exley, but he rejected it for inclusion in the Getty collection and published it elsewhere online (which I have been unable to find). I did a reverse image search on the left picture, but only was able to, unsurprisingly, find the redacted photo just released, not the original unredacted one. Perhaps you can find it and publish it here on IIDB. So, I'm thinking the left picture was taken by Epstein himself, or one of his associates, and that's how it ended up in the "Epstein files". Epstein had met and befriended both Bill Clinton and Michael Jackson by this time, so it could be that Epstein was personally invited by either Bill and/or Michael to hang out with them on that day. Epstein was known to be a celebrity worshipper, so it would be unsurprising that he would be there.

It should also be noted that MeidasTouch is not a reliable source.
 
Last edited:
thebeave said:
GenesisNemesis said:
View attachment 53074

You have to wonder why they'd go through this trouble to fake an image of Clinton, as well as go through the trouble of blacking out other files.
Click to expand...
Something is not right here. Those are two different photos (taken a few seconds apart), either by the same photographer (Jonathan Exley) or by another photographer co-located with him. Given the drastic lighting and zoom level differences between the two photos I would lean towards it being two different photographers at the 12/19/03 photo op. The right hand photo is indeed a Getty Images photo per the watermark, as you can see here. I checked to see if Getty had the left side photo in its collection, but came up empty handed. You're welcome to search Getty yourself, but it lacks the Getty Images watermark, so I don't think you'll find it. Or perhaps it was also taken by Jonathan Exley, but he rejected it for inclusion in the Getty collection and published it elsewhere online (which I have been unable to find). I did a reverse image search on the left picture, but only was able to, unsurprisingly, find the redacted photo just released, not the original unredacted one. Perhaps you can find it and publish it here on IIDB. So, I'm thinking the left picture was taken by Epstein himself, or one of his associates, and that's how it ended up in the "Epstein files". Epstein had met and befriended both Bill Clinton and Michael Jackson by this time, so it could be that Epstein was personally invited by either Bill and/or Michael to hang out with them on that day. Epstein was known to be a celebrity worshipper, so it would be unsurprising that he would be there.

It should also be noted that MeidasTouch is not a reliable source.
Click to expand...
Neither are kneejerk white knights of the right.
 
laughing dog said:
thebeave said:
GenesisNemesis said:
View attachment 53074

You have to wonder why they'd go through this trouble to fake an image of Clinton, as well as go through the trouble of blacking out other files.
Click to expand...
Something is not right here. Those are two different photos (taken a few seconds apart), either by the same photographer (Jonathan Exley) or by another photographer co-located with him. Given the drastic lighting and zoom level differences between the two photos I would lean towards it being two different photographers at the 12/19/03 photo op. The right hand photo is indeed a Getty Images photo per the watermark, as you can see here. I checked to see if Getty had the left side photo in its collection, but came up empty handed. You're welcome to search Getty yourself, but it lacks the Getty Images watermark, so I don't think you'll find it. Or perhaps it was also taken by Jonathan Exley, but he rejected it for inclusion in the Getty collection and published it elsewhere online (which I have been unable to find). I did a reverse image search on the left picture, but only was able to, unsurprisingly, find the redacted photo just released, not the original unredacted one. Perhaps you can find it and publish it here on IIDB. So, I'm thinking the left picture was taken by Epstein himself, or one of his associates, and that's how it ended up in the "Epstein files". Epstein had met and befriended both Bill Clinton and Michael Jackson by this time, so it could be that Epstein was personally invited by either Bill and/or Michael to hang out with them on that day. Epstein was known to be a celebrity worshipper, so it would be unsurprising that he would be there.

It should also be noted that MeidasTouch is not a reliable source.
Click to expand...
Neither are kneejerk white knights of the right.
Click to expand...
Or anyone who unironically believes "TDS" is a thing.
 
Is the Trump admin at all a reliable source? Something tells me it's not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom