Violence isn't culture. Culture is stuff like how you ask a girl on a date, or how you politely ask people to pass the salt. It regulates what is considered unwelcome attention and what is pleasant curiosity. It defines the range of what is considered your personal space. It very strictly regulates how you show disapproval over a perceived transgression, and how the response should be. None of these are universal. But the functions are universal. What sets cultures apart is simply the schema for how they work. What the Swedish culture lacks entirely is a mechanism with which to establish schema first, before starting to communicate. It just assumes a shared culture. Which may be well adapted to a bunch of Viking farmers but fucking useless in today's world. This facet of Swedish culture needs to die. But it will die. I can't see how it can survive much longer. It's a completely maladaptive meme.
When it comes to violence all cultures are identical IMHO. The fact that in certain regions in the world there is more violent has more to do with various social frictions. These are especially great in any region transitioning from a primarily agrarian economy to an industrial economy... ie the entire Middle-East. Even though they're reaching the end of it. In the end of this period in Europe we got WWI and WW2. The Middle-East isn't even close to reaching that level of carnage, so we do well in getting off any high horse.
I disagree. Violence can be part of a culture if it is practiced by a particular group. The pattern of violence may not always be the same. For instance the former European colonialists and Americans often focus on spurring conflict from behind the scene with few boots on the ground.
Sweden is one of the best cultures around. Its people built up a prosperous society with a relative democracy and its an interesting place to visit. WWI and WWII occurred during a set period of time and this is not a daily event like in the Middle East.
Why is Sweden under attack for is values? I even heard (though hearsay) that some left winger welcome the migrants by telling them that Sweden has very little culture and the influx of immigrant culture is welcome.
Europe does not need mass immigration. Its time the Africans Asians and Middle Easterners took responsibility for their own countries instead of fleeing to Europe. It may involve standing up to the USA and Europe as well as cleaning up their own corrupt countries.
Then do many really understand the concept of individual liberties. I did not find this in the Middle East so much. The Arab Spring concept is sometimes like explaining sex to a virgin. Its something desired but not really understood due to non experience.
I don't think Sweden needs to change all that much. I think that those who arrive in Sweden need to follow Swedish laws and not try to impose their own valuesif existing ones are fine. At the same time they should be allowed to be diverse as long as this is not imposed on others.
Some values may be interchanged but that is not something that should be made obligatory.
Exceptions are where the US, Britain and others have destroyed Iraq, Syria and Libya turning them into fragmented enclaves under various warlords who are at war with each other. However not all Syrians coming over are seeking asylum.
I will not look at the rape statistics as there is a lot to read before forming a conclusion.