• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Fear of God - It's what makes us nicer: Study

Dear worshipers of ancient, man-made texts:

God does not send anyone to hell. She loves us all, but it is not in Her nature to punish or reward. She doesn't work that way. She respects our autonomy and wishes us no harm. Our purpose is to live as humans and strive toward peace and understanding using our own gifts that She has given us. She does not ask for worship or conformity. She doesn't ask anything of us at all except to live as humans, and to use our gifts intelligently. There is no punishment for not doing so except that we create our own hells.
 
I once was with the same notion then I realised 'not everyone' will live by the philosophy when the temptation of self gratification and importance being so great would require his fellow man to suffer in order to make that gain. There are no deterents or fears, so by deceitful means and cunning individuals can become influencial then powerful over the non-the-wiser peaceful and loving.
 
As I said, commanding someone to "love" you is what abusers do.

And as Angra Mainyu and Bilby point out with your bible's words, commanding that "love" under threat of "eternal fire" is what a homicidal psychotic abuser would do

The threat of hell doesn't come till later in the bible after all the covenants and laws before.Christians such as myself believe; God by the covenants made were then broken,then made again and broken again should then by the acts not following those laws.God must then destroy man for failure to keep to what man promised. God does not lie or withdraw his side of the agreements and it pains him to do so. Hence Jesus .. the negotiator the last chance, the last hope. It was He that gave the final ultimatum between heaven or hell.

You are still not describing a perfect god, but rather an abusive tyrant. If it pains your god so much to punish people to "eternal fire", he wouldn't do it.
 
You are still not describing a perfect god, but rather an abusive tyrant. If it pains your god so much to punish people to "eternal fire", he wouldn't do it.

The discription is;' Most truthful and loving God. What he said he will do, he must do according the promises made several times between man and God. It is understandable for me that there can be no more covenants. The threat of hell is a deterent more so to the things, like the days of Noah mentioned by Jesus.
 
You are still not describing a perfect god, but rather an abusive tyrant. If it pains your god so much to punish people to "eternal fire", he wouldn't do it.

The discription is;' Most truthful and loving God. What he said he will do, he must do according the promises made several times between man and God. It is understandable for me that there can be no more covenants. The threat of hell is a deterent more so to the things, like the days of Noah mentioned by Jesus.

Still not seeing the "loving" part, but it sounds like you are saying that hell is no longer on the table as a punishment threat?
 
I once was with the same notion then I realised 'not everyone' will live by the philosophy when the temptation of self gratification and importance being so great would require his fellow man to suffer in order to make that gain. There are no deterents or fears, so by deceitful means and cunning individuals can become influencial then powerful over the non-the-wiser peaceful and loving.

That's because you still think in black and white terms. Nothing in reality is black and white. That's just a cognitive shortcut - useful for quick, situational thinking, but a perceptive pitfall in trying to understand humanness and the world we live in. It's understandable, but still lazy and erroneous.

YOU don't get to judge or control other human beings. Dark Ages religion fosters this backward view, and it is not helpful in a world of seven billion and myriad, ever-changing cultures.

The best an intelligent being can do is to seek a realistic understanding, which means examining not just reality, but how we perceive it. (something ancient texts don't reveal; hint: we have to do it ourselves.)

Nothing has had more cunning influence over human minds and behavior than religious systems that sow fear, punish doubt, cultivate us vs. them mentality, offer stupid and unrealistic magical answers, and teach inhumane ideas about what it means to be human.

In your comments about judging and controlling, do you not notice that you are confusing yourself with the created God of the Bible?

Evil acts flourish best among cultures of distortions, lies, fear, avoidance, and ignorance, i.e., religion of the absolutist, infallible, unquestioned, magical, black-and-white, culturally myopic kind.
 
The discription is;' Most truthful and loving God. What he said he will do, he must do according the promises made several times between man and God. It is understandable for me that there can be no more covenants. The threat of hell is a deterent more so to the things, like the days of Noah mentioned by Jesus.

Still not seeing the "loving" part, but it sounds like you are saying that hell is no longer on the table as a punishment threat?

Sorry about that, Hell is still a warning to all.
 
Learner said:
The threat of hell doesn't come till later in the bible after all the covenants and laws before.Christians such as myself believe; God by the covenants made were then broken,then made again and broken again should then by the acts not following those laws.God must then destroy man for failure to keep to what man promised. God does not lie or withdraw his side of the agreements and it pains him to do so. Hence Jesus .. the negotiator the last chance, the last hope. It was He that gave the final ultimatum between heaven or hell.
Actually, "man" didn't promise anything. Some men might have, but I'm certain I did not.
In fact, the people Yahweh threatens are not the same people who agreed to any covenant.

Regardless, Yahweh's behavior would be hugely evil even if every person had broken a promise to him. Torturing people for eternity for breaking a promise is evil.

Learner said:
The discription is;' Most truthful and loving God. What he said he will do, he must do according the promises made several times between man and God. It is understandable for me that there can be no more covenants. The threat of hell is a deterent more so to the things, like the days of Noah mentioned by Jesus.

But if you want to go with the Old Testament, I will point out the victims of his attrocious commands did not sign up for any covenant. Let me give you an example (from my moral case against Christianity):

Numbers 31 describes how Yahweh commanded Moses to carry out an attack on other people, and the events that unfolded after that.

GWEB:

Numbers 31

31:1 Yahweh spoke to Moses, saying, 31:2 Avenge the children of Israel of the Midianites: afterward you shall be gathered to your people. 31:3 Moses spoke to the people, saying, Arm you men from among you for the war, that they may go against Midian, to execute Yahweh's vengeance on Midian. 31:4 Of every tribe one thousand, throughout all the tribes of Israel, you shall send to the war. 31:5 So there were delivered, out of the thousands of Israel, a thousand of every tribe, twelve thousand armed for war. 31:6 Moses sent them, one thousand of every tribe, to the war, them and Phinehas the son of Eleazar the priest, to the war, with the vessels of the sanctuary and the trumpets for the alarm in his hand. 31:7 They warred against Midian, as Yahweh commanded Moses; and they killed every male. 31:8 They killed the kings of Midian with the rest of their slain: Evi, and Rekem, and Zur, and Hur, and Reba, the five kings of Midian: Balaam also the son of Beor they killed with the sword. 31:9 The children of Israel took captive the women of Midian and their little ones; and all their livestock, and all their flocks, and all their goods, they took for a prey. 31:10 All their cities in the places in which they lived, and all their encampments, they burnt with fire. 31:11 They took all the spoil, and all the prey, both of man and of animal. 31:12 They brought the captives, and the prey, and the spoil, to Moses, and to Eleazar the priest, and to the congregation of the children of Israel, to the camp at the plains of Moab, which are by the Jordan at Jericho.

So, those ancient Israelite troops attacked and killed every single man, apparently regardless of whether those men were combatants or not, whether they were too ill or old to fight, or whether they had surrendered. They also took the women and their children as spoils of war. In other words, they took them as slaves as slaves, and brought them to Moses and to one of Yahweh’s priests.

The soldiers surely would expect to take women as sex slaves – their consent was not required, as usual -, raping them repeatedly – in accordance to Yahweh’s laws.

What was Moses’s reaction?

GWEB:

Numbers 31

31:13 Moses, and Eleazar the priest, and all the princes of the congregation, went forth to meet them outside of the camp. 31:14 Moses was angry with the officers of the army, the captains of thousands and the captains of hundreds, who came from the service of the war. 31:15 Moses said to them, Have you saved all the women alive? 31:16 Behold, these caused the children of Israel, through the counsel of Balaam, to commit trespass against Yahweh in the matter of Peor, and so the plague was among the congregation of Yahweh. 31:17 Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man by lying with him. 31:18 But all the girls, who have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.

So, Moses was not angry because his troops wanted to enslave children – both boys and girls -, or because they wanted to enslave adult women, in general.

Instead, Moses was angry because the soldiers had kept the women who were not virgins alive, and apparently – unless he was lying about his motivation, but why would he? - he believed that all of the women who were not virgin had “caused” the children of Israel to trespass against Yahweh. Furthermore, he believed apparently that those women deserved to be killed for that.

So, Moses commanded that all women who were not virgins be killed. He further commanded that every male child be killed as well.

On the other hand, Moses told his men to keep the virgin girls for themselves - implicitly for sex slavery and repeated rape in the future - if they so choose.

It is not specified what he wanted his men to do with adult women who were virgins – if there were any -, or with girls who were not virgins because they had been raped already. Given context, it seems all non-virgins were to be killed regardless of whether they were adults. As for adult women, also context indicates that they were presumed to be non-virgins – which might or might have been true, but of course does not justify the killings in any way -, and were to be executed. In any event, his command was immoral regardless of how he split the girls and the women between those that were to be killed and those that were to be enslaved and raped whenever their masters chose.

So, in particular, Moses:

1. Falsely blamed all non-virgin women for a plague. Of course, regardless of what some Israelite men did in order to have sex with at most some – surely not all – of those women, those men made their own choices, and in any case, surely blaming those women for a plague was absurd.

2. Murdered all of the boys but kept girls for slavery, including sex slavery and thus repeated rape.

Given that behavior, even independently of other events, one should reckon that Moses was a moral monster, a mass-murderer and mass-rapist – regardless of whether he engaged in mass rape personally, he surely was responsible given his commands.

So, what was Yahweh's reaction?

GWEB:

Numbers 31

31:25 Yahweh spoke to Moses, saying, 31:26 Take the sum of the prey that was taken, both of man and of animal, you, and Eleazar the priest, and the heads of the fathers' houses of the congregation; 31:27 and divide the prey into two parts: between the men skilled in war, who went out to battle, and all the congregation. 31:28 Levy a tribute to Yahweh of the men of war who went out to battle: one soul of five hundred, both of the persons, and of the cattle, and of the donkeys, and of the flocks: 31:29 take it of their half, and give it to Eleazar the priest, for Yahweh's wave offering. 31:30 Of the children of Israel's half, you shall take one drawn out of every fifty, of the persons, of the cattle, of the donkeys, and of the flocks, even of all the livestock, and give them to the Levites, who perform the duty of the tent of Yahweh.

Yahweh did not punish Moses or his men, or expressed any disapproval whatsoever, but proceeded to give instructions as to how to divide the spoils of war, including the people taken as slaves.

Even assuming for the sake of the argument that there was no human sacrifice and Yahweh’s “wave offering” was “just” giving some captives to the priests as slaves, the fact remains that Yahweh instructed Moses – and, through him, many other ancient Israelite men – to engage in mass slavery and mass rape. Yahweh is another moral monster, like Moses.

So, what happened then?

They just proceeded to divide the spoils, after murdering the captive women and perhaps girls who were not virgins – or who they believed were not virgins, anyway – and the children of those who had children. While it would have been monstrous to do that to a single woman or to a single child, one may point out here that the massacre was massive, as one may reckon from the description.

GWEB:

Numbers 31

31:31 Moses and Eleazar the priest did as Yahweh commanded Moses. 31:32 Now the prey, over and above the booty which the men of war took, was six hundred seventy-five thousand sheep, 31:33 and seventy-two thousand head of cattle, 31:34 and sixty-one thousand donkeys, 31:35 and thirty-two thousand persons in all, of the women who had not known man by lying with him. 31:36 The half, which was the portion of those who went out to war, was in number three hundred thirty-seven thousand five hundred sheep: 31:37 and Yahweh's tribute of the sheep was six hundred seventy-five. 31:38 The cattle were thirty-six thousand; of which Yahweh's tribute was seventy-two. 31:39 The donkeys were thirty thousand five hundred; of which Yahweh's tribute was sixty-one. 31:40 The persons were sixteen thousand; of whom Yahweh's tribute was thirty-two persons. 31:41 Moses gave the tribute, which was Yahweh's wave offering, to Eleazar the priest, as Yahweh commanded Moses. 31:42 Of the children of Israel's half, which Moses divided off from the men who warred 31:43 (now the congregation's half was three hundred thirty-seven thousand five hundred sheep, 31:44 and thirty-six thousand head of cattle, 31:45 and thirty thousand five hundred donkeys, 31:46 and sixteen thousand persons), 31:47 even of the children of Israel's half, Moses took one drawn out of every fifty, both of man and of animal, and gave them to the Levites, who performed the duty of the tent of Yahweh; as Yahweh commanded Moses. 31:48 The officers who were over the thousands of the army, the captains of thousands, and the captains of hundreds, came near to Moses; 31:49 and they said to Moses, Your servants have taken the sum of the men of war who are under our command, and there lacks not one man of us. 31:50 We have brought Yahweh's offering, what every man has gotten, of jewels of gold, armlets, and bracelets, signet rings, earrings, and necklaces, to make atonement for our souls before Yahweh. 31:51 Moses and Eleazar the priest took the gold of them, even all worked jewels. 31:52 All the gold of the wave offering that they offered up to Yahweh, of the captains of thousands, and of the captains of hundreds, was sixteen thousand seven hundred fifty shekels. 31:53 (For the men of war had taken booty, every man for himself.) 31:54 Moses and Eleazar the priest took the gold of the captains of thousands and of hundreds, and brought it into the Tent of Meeting, for a memorial for the children of Israel before Yahweh.

So, 32000 girls and/or women were taken as slaves. Usually, that would mean sex slavery, so they would live a life of constant rape. The number of boys who were murdered is not specified, and neither is the number of women who were not virgins – or presumed to be non-virgins, anyway.

However, one can tell that the number of murder victims in that event was probably also in the thousands, since there is no good reason to suspect that there were so many more virgin girls – and adult women, if any were spared – than boys and women who were not virgins – or were presumed to be non-virgins – put together.

So, given those actions, one ought to reckon that Yahweh is a moral monster. And so is Moses. And of course, the victims of the attack were not part of any covenant. They were just victims (not that a covenant would have justify that, anyway).
 
All the defenses for God's lack of action seem to focus on the perpetrators and not the victims. They're breaking the covenant, so therefore God's hands are tied.

I don't see what that has to do with anything. The victims aren't breaking any kind of covenant with God and yet he still feels that his hands are tied and he can't do anything for them. Especially given the whole "And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do" clause of the Man-God contract, God really seems to sit back and not do anything when these faithful people who have not broken any promises to him ask for a bit of backup to deal with the guy shooting a rifle at their face.
 
Still not seeing the "loving" part, but it sounds like you are saying that hell is no longer on the table as a punishment threat?

Sorry about that, Hell is still a warning to all.

Hell doesn't bother the self-righteous 'believers', only decent people. A friend of mine used to say, 'There'll be nobody in Hell but me and Hitler', and she was one of the nicest and most decent Roman Catholics I have met.
 
We are commanded to love God,...

As I said, commanding someone to "love" you is what abusers do.

If you separate the greatest commandments, then they loose all their meaning and we completely miss the point. How can anyone love an invisible God they do not know or cannot see? You can't, and that makes the greatest commandment on it's own total fiction.

The greatest commandments come as a complete package, we show our love for God by the way we love and care for all our neighbours who we know. so when we are kind and care for the less fortunate, feed the poor, give shelter to the homeless, visit the sick and the prisoner, then this is how we love God.

Please explain how any of this is what an abuser would do.

And as Angra Mainyu and Bilby point out with your bible's words, commanding that "love" under threat of "eternal fire" is what a homicidal psychotic abuser would do

Ideally, we should be kind and caring towards the less fortunate, because we choose to do so freely and willingly, and then we would not have to live under the threat of hellfire. However, if we cannot care for them freely and willingly, we have the threat of hellfire hanging over our heads. So it would make sense to help people, either freely and willingly, or out of fear.

And just to try and make a point, if I help a homeless person, how does that benefit God? what does God get out of it, he does not need the money or food I give to a homeless person, God does not need my help, he can put all things right in a greater good life after death.

This world seems to lack a lot of compassion and care, it is up to each one of us to try and make the world a slightly better place.

Peace.
 
As I said, commanding someone to "love" you is what abusers do.

If you separate the greatest commandments, then they loose all their meaning and we completely miss the point. How can anyone love an invisible God they do not know or cannot see? You can't, and that makes the greatest commandment on it's own total fiction.

The greatest commandments come as a complete package, we show our love for God by the way we love and care for all our neighbours who we know. so when we are kind and care for the less fortunate, feed the poor, give shelter to the homeless, visit the sick and the prisoner, then this is how we love God.
So no actual belief in you god is required?

Assume your god exists. I don't believe he exists but I care for my neighbors and the less fortunate; feed the poor, give shelter to the homeless, visit the sick and the prisoner, etc. - you are saying then that everything is hunky dory with your god? Actions matter, faith doesn't?

And as Angra Mainyu and Bilby point out with your bible's words, commanding that "love" under threat of "eternal fire" is what a homicidal psychotic abuser would do

Ideally, we should be kind and caring towards the less fortunate, because we choose to do so freely and willingly, and then we would not have to live under the threat of hellfire. However, if we cannot care for them freely and willingly, we have the threat of hellfire hanging over our heads. So it would make sense to help people, either freely and willingly, or out of fear.
Charity by threat. Lovely... not.


And just to try and make a point, if I help a homeless person, how does that benefit God? what does God get out of it, he does not need the money or food I give to a homeless person, God does not need my help, he can put all things right in a greater good life after death.

This world seems to lack a lot of compassion and care, it is up to each one of us to try and make the world a slightly better place.

Peace.

Your god, if he existed, could put everything right now, on this earth, in this life.
 
If you separate the greatest commandments, then they loose all their meaning and we completely miss the point. How can anyone love an invisible God they do not know or cannot see? You can't, and that makes the greatest commandment on it's own total fiction.

The greatest commandments come as a complete package, we show our love for God by the way we love and care for all our neighbours who we know. so when we are kind and care for the less fortunate, feed the poor, give shelter to the homeless, visit the sick and the prisoner, then this is how we love God.
Originally posted by RavenSky;
So no actual belief in you god is required?

Assume your god exists. I don't believe he exists but I care for my neighbors and the less fortunate; feed the poor, give shelter to the homeless, visit the sick and the prisoner, etc. - you are saying then that everything is hunky dory with your god? Actions matter, faith doesn't?

The parable of the Good Samaritan is profound, if you search for a greatest good interpretation.

Ideally, we should be kind and caring towards the less fortunate, because we choose to do so freely and willingly, and then we would not have to live under the threat of hellfire. However, if we cannot care for them freely and willingly, we have the threat of hellfire hanging over our heads. So it would make sense to help people, either freely and willingly, or out of fear.

Charity by threat. Lovely... not.

The law of the land is very much the same, ideally we should not go round shooting people, but if we do, then there is the fear of getting caught by the cops. We should not have to live in fear of the police if we are law abiding citizens. We should not live in fear of God, if we choose to be kind to our neighbours.

The achievements of the human race over the last century, have been prenominal, yet we lack the intelligence to live in peace with each other, very sad.

Your god, if he existed, could put everything right now, on this earth, in this life.

The God who created the universe and life hears the prayers of Hindus, Muslims, Christians Sikhs and everyone else, so he is not my exclusive God.

We think we know best, we want to do things our way, so why should God keep putting our mess right?

And if God was to put everything right, what should he do?
 
The parable of the Good Samaritan is profound, if you search for a greatest good interpretation.

Mein Kampf is profound, if you search for a greatest good interpretation.

Of course, if you read what's there, rather than a pollyannaish personal reinterpretation, the profundity evaporates.
 
The parable of the Good Samaritan is profound, if you search for a greatest good interpretation.

Mein Kampf is profound, if you search for a greatest good interpretation.

Of course, if you read what's there, rather than a pollyannaish personal reinterpretation, the profundity evaporates.

Tonight I shall be going out with the Street Pastor team, and we need a pollyannaish optimism with the situations we encounter, we search for the good in all people. This can be challenging at times, because we come across a fair amount of anger and violence.

Recently we saw a dozen people fighting about fifty metres down the road, it was just after the pubs had closed at 3 am. As we approached I saw one man punched in the face, he went straight down, I saw another man being kicked while he was on the ground, and a lady punched in the face. At this moment all we could see was a bunch of drunk hooligans.

I don’t know what we do, other than walk amongst the fight, it came to a stop, a few people ran off, by this time a number of onlookers had arrived, some were trying to stir up more trouble. We stayed with this crowd for about twenty minutes, somehow we helped tempers to calm, and as people calmed down, we saw a nicer side to these people. It ended with lots of handshakes and hugs. I am a mere youngster of 67, I was with two other ladies in their seventies, when we came across this incident.

It can seem risky looking for the good in a bunch of hooligans, you cannot see it from a distance, but if you take that risk to be amongst them, there is the hope you can see a kinder side.

Many people say they would not volunteer to do the things we do, others say we should wear protective clothing, or carry a stun gun. But we do not go out in our strength or courage, we depend on prayer, and we trust that God hears our prayers. Being a pacifist means I have to do something, I can’t just talk about it.
 
Do you find it somewhat disconcerting that you distracted God with your own prayers for protection so that he was too busy watching your back to jump in and help protect the lady who got punched in the face?
 
Mein Kampf is profound, if you search for a greatest good interpretation.

Of course, if you read what's there, rather than a pollyannaish personal reinterpretation, the profundity evaporates.

Tonight I shall be going out with the Street Pastor team, and we need a pollyannaish optimism with the situations we encounter, we search for the good in all people. This can be challenging at times, because we come across a fair amount of anger and violence.

Recently we saw a dozen people fighting about fifty metres down the road, it was just after the pubs had closed at 3 am. As we approached I saw one man punched in the face, he went straight down, I saw another man being kicked while he was on the ground, and a lady punched in the face. At this moment all we could see was a bunch of drunk hooligans.

I don’t know what we do, other than walk amongst the fight, it came to a stop, a few people ran off, by this time a number of onlookers had arrived, some were trying to stir up more trouble. We stayed with this crowd for about twenty minutes, somehow we helped tempers to calm, and as people calmed down, we saw a nicer side to these people. It ended with lots of handshakes and hugs. I am a mere youngster of 67, I was with two other ladies in their seventies, when we came across this incident.

It can seem risky looking for the good in a bunch of hooligans, you cannot see it from a distance, but if you take that risk to be amongst them, there is the hope you can see a kinder side.

Many people say they would not volunteer to do the things we do, others say we should wear protective clothing, or carry a stun gun. But we do not go out in our strength or courage, we depend on prayer, and we trust that God hears our prayers. Being a pacifist means I have to do something, I can’t just talk about it.

That's a lovely anecdote.

It's so entertaining that one could almost miss the fact that it is a total change of subject that in no way relates to the post it is supposedly in response to.

Nobody is suggesting that you are not a fantastic person who does lots of good things for others. But no matter how much of that you do, it remains irrelevant to the discussion we were having.
 
The parable of the Good Samaritan is profound, if you search for a greatest good interpretation.
Which doesn't actually address my question :shrug:

Charity by threat. Lovely... not.

The law of the land is very much the same, ideally we should not go round shooting people, but if we do, then there is the fear of getting caught by the cops. We should not have to live in fear of the police if we are law abiding citizens. We should not live in fear of God, if we choose to be kind to our neighbours.
Not a good analogy at all. Shooting people is an overt action to harm another person.

Lack of charity is, at worst, an omission.

Shooting someone is also relatively binary. Barring extenuating circumstances like self defense, when you shoot someone its quite clear they've been shot.

With charity, who decides how much, how long, how many "neighbors". There will always and always and always be yet another neighbor in need. If you take care of one, but not the other is it hellfire for you? If you only have enough to support yourself, are you in trouble with your god for not giving it away anyway? Way too many variables.

Your god, if he existed, could put everything right now, on this earth, in this life.

The God who created the universe and life hears the prayers of Hindus, Muslims, Christians Sikhs and everyone else, so he is not my exclusive God.
I am quite certain "Hindus, Muslims, Christians Sikhs and everyone else" do not describe their gods as you describe yours. So either they have their gods and you have yours, or a bunch of you are wrong about the nature of your god, or no gods exist. :shrug: Since you are discussing the nature of the god of your bible, and not any of the Hindu gods, I will refer to it as "your god"

We think we know best, we want to do things our way, so why should God keep putting our mess right?
Because, according to you, he's all-loving

And if God was to put everything right, what should he do?
Be happy
 
Back
Top Bottom