First real evidence presented the Biden POTUS election really was a fraud

[Elixir]

. Although twitter is a private company they are also acting as a defacto monopoly of the public square purposely not following their own policy censoring everthing other than what the Biden administration deems acceptable.

Utter falsehood.
NWRT.
Make up better shit, Vonse.

 

[Patooka]

It applies to the federal government of which the Biden administration would apply. Although twitter is a private company they are also acting as a defacto monopoly of the public square purposely not following their own policy censoring everthing other than what the Biden administration deems acceptable.

None of which actually happened. Firstly, it was Biden's campaign team he wasn't in government. Secondly, all they communicated to Twitter was that Hunter Biden's dick pics aren't a good look.

And finally, revenge porn is illegal and is not protected by the First Amendment. Your argument is complete horseshit. And seeing as you like youtube clips watch this to learn how completely nothing Taibbi's spew is:

 

[RVonse]

Having browsed through the Twitter chain, this is again one of those molehills, as the people that invested so heavily in the laptop are trying to get their money's worth out of that scandal.

The amazing thing is the eagerness of the suckers who will grasp at any straw, 2 years after the fact and no matter how nonsensical, to reach the magical conclusion that a vast, 8 million person conspiracy robbed them of their orange dictator, leaving no trace and no witnesses.
How retarded do you have to be?

What pisses me off is that it is people like these that make me scour my unsent work emails for any potentially unintended interpretation by any trollish lawyer down the road.

I'm reading these "controversial" conversations and I'm seeing people trying to be very clear to what they are doing, why, and how. It is claims of conspiracy, while it was actually just following unbiased policy.

No one is going to file any criminal charges against anyone. Elon Musk of all people would not have released any of this if he thought there would be that kind hard liabilty or peril, because he owns the company now and would not want that kind of trouble.

But there is a lot of evidence shown for all to observe what actually happened during the last election supporting many of Mr. Trumps claim. Left can not call this a "conspiracy theory", twitter was not following their own policy (or their own CEO) acting in collusion with a political party to steer an election.

 

[Harry Bosch]

One thing that really drives me crazy about Trumpsters today is that they have to be so vague and nebulous. I have a short attention span. Could someone please explain to me the following: 1) what is on the laptop that is so damning; 2) how do we know that the laptop wasn't tampered with; and 3) finally: what the hell does it have to do with Joe Biden?

 

[Elixir]

Who tried to violently overthrow the government and install himself as ruler?
(HINT: Not Biden. Not Joe, not Hunter)
Why should anyone believe @RVonse when he makes shit up?

 

[ZiprHead]

I don't understand. How does Twitter influence the vote count, RVonse? Are you saying if Twitter users got to see Hunter's dick pics they would have voted for Trump?

 

[James Brown]

Curious how the party that is so up in arms about supposed 'groomers' spends so much time obsessing over dick pics.

Kevin Drum summarizes this kerfuffle nicely.

And where are we with the Hunter laptop story today? Same as always, I'd say. Most of the juicy details—drug use, dick pics, money problems, 10% for the "big guy," etc.—have been public for a long time. Hunter has been under investigation for tax problems for a few years, and charges might drop soon. But even if they do, there's simply never been anything implicating Joe Biden in any of it.

There still isn't, but Republicans have announced that they plan to hold Benghazi-style hearings about the Hunter Biden laptop as soon as they take over the House in January. Once again, they're trying to relive past triumphs because they have nothing else on tap. Good luck to them.

 

[Patooka]

I tried reading Taibbi's magnum opus and it's the implication olympics I expected. However, Sam Seder raised a good point which I will share with everyone here:



"For instance, in 2020, requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were received and honored."

Trump White House. Not Trump Campaign. But the United States Federal Government. I know RVonse isn't going to answer, but it would be nice if Q-tards could explain why they are comfortable with Trump conscripting public servants to campaign for him on the taxpayer's dime. All I know is that in Australia that's illegal. And even if it is legal in the US, it's hugely unethical.

But, like I said, I have zero expectations with regards to integrity and Trump supporters.

 

[RVonse]

I tried reading Taibbi's magnum opus and it's the implication olympics I expected. However, Sam Seder raised a good point which I will share with everyone here:



"For instance, in 2020, requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were received and honored."

Trump White House. Not Trump Campaign. But the United States Federal Government. I know RVonse isn't going to answer, but it would be nice if Q-tards could explain why they are comfortable with Trump conscripting public servants to campaign for him on the taxpayer's dime. All I know is that in Australia that's illegal. And even if it is legal in the US, it's hugely unethical.

But, like I said, I have zero expectations with regards to integrity and Trump supporters.

What is a Q-tard? As for myself, I'm not a Trump supporter but I do sympathize and think I understand their viewpoint which no one else (other than Laughing Dog) seems to even care. I'm not a Republican either although I do agree with some of their positions.... and until Trump came along I mostly voted Democrat. So Im a political atheist on an atheist forum.

I fail to see why it is so significant a POTUS white house staff must be different than their respective campaign if they are seeking re-election? What would you ideally expect the POTUS to do, employ and staff an entirely different complex other than their main place of employment (the white house)? Just asking because I never thought about it.

 

[Patooka]

You have never thought if the function of the executive branch is simply to get itself re elected? I don't believe you. What you are describing is something a monarchy or dictatorship does. Not a democracy. The crap you spew makes me know that you know the difference.

 

[ZiprHead]

I'm not a Trump supporter

Why do I not believe this?

 

[jonatha]

I fail to see why it is so significant a POTUS white house staff must be different than their respective campaign if they are seeking re-election?

wiki hatch act

 

[blastula]

I fail to see why it is so significant a POTUS white house staff must be different than their respective campaign if they are seeking re-election?

What The Fuck. Now you're saying it doesn't matter to you that Trump was president at the time?

<removed> You have repeatedly [said] that "the Biden administration" did something wrong with Twitter, when he wasn't even president at the time.

Proving beyond all doubt the Biden administration in collusion with twitter

It applies to the federal government of which the Biden administration would apply.

 

[Patooka]

What is a Q-tard?

Someone who provides unconditional support for Trump and will look for any and all pieces of unverifiable trash to make Trump seem credible. If you would like a comparison, the people who threw every piece of information despite how batshit crazy it was that Saddam had WMDs are just as worthless pieces of shit who leap to Trump's defense. I call them Q-tards. If you consider yourself someone who unconditionally leaps to Trumps defense...I don't know what to tell you. I might have a shoe that fits you.

As for myself, I'm not a Trump supporter

You very much are.

A Hero of Modern Times

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckqkvERsKTQ As I listened to the above video (several months old now) it occurred to me just how courageous Roger Stone is. Whether you like Trump or not you can not listen to this guy without being impressed with Stone. He was in the perfect position to cause...

iidb.org

Trump is starting to deliver

Some awesome news! Ford is NOT going to move production to Mexico now: https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-ford-not-moving-u-plant-mexico-023323315--finance.html?.tsrc=jtc_news_index As the late Jackie Gleason would say....."How Sweet It Is!" I see a big win for the US middle class...

iidb.org

And then there is the thread you yourself created in a deliberate attempt to gaslight Jan6;

Why did the Capital Police let the protesters inside the gates?

I keep hearing over and over again from Democrat friends that if Trump had just conceded gracefully, the riot never would have happened. Perhaps but we do not know that for sure. While we are at it we could also say if the protesters had never been born there would not have been a riot...

iidb.org

You are such a Trump fanboy. I just don't understand why you don't have the courage to admit it.

and until Trump came along I mostly voted Democrat.

And I know your selfish reason why. The search function appears to only go back until 2018 but I distincly remember you saying you were unemployed in 2016, then got a job and then thought correlation equals causation.

So Im a political atheist on an atheist forum.

You are absolutely nothing of the sort. Anyone can look at your posts and clearly see you favour one side more than the other. You are as impartial as Tim Pool or Russel Brand and I know you know who they are.

I fail to see why it is so significant a POTUS white house staff must be different than their respective campaign if they are seeking re-election?

I believe you. You don't see why it is so significant. Except I think you do. You have zero credibility in my eyes I seriously doubt you would have been so cool with it if Obama did it or if Biden does it in 2024. But Republicans get a free pass in your "politically atheist" eyes.

What would you ideally expect the POTUS to do, employ and staff an entirely different complex other than their main place of employment (the white house)?

Yes.

Just asking because I never thought about it.

I believe you. You seem fine with the executive branch being funded by your money only existing to feed upon itself. On taxpayer dollars.

Whilst faux pretending you give a flying fuck about homelessness.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

A very good post. RVonse's stance on Trump has been quite a bit more forceful in support than it has in criticism. His criticism of Trump is much like other Trump supporters who add qualifications and buts and all sorts of things to make it seem like criticism, but in general it is a false façade. Another person who fears the establishment, very willing to give the keys to the kingdom to a conman.

 

[RVonse]

So Im a political atheist on an atheist forum.

You are absolutely nothing of the sort. Anyone can look at your posts and clearly see you favour one side more than the other. You are as impartial as Tim Pool or Russel Brand and I know you know who they are.

Lets look at my voting history then. Since I was old enough to vote, I cast for the following: Carter, Reagan (both terms), Ross Perot, Clinton (2nd term), Al Gore, Kerry, Obama (both terms), and Trump (both terms)

So that is about as politically athiest as you can get. Some conservatives, Reagan and Trump but mostly a lot of left guys like Carter, Kerry, Gore plus 1 term of Clinton. If anything you would call me more lefty and liberal based on actual voting history. Note also that had Sanders made it to the ticket I would have surely voted for him over Trump both terms. I never voted for a Bush and thought (still believe) he was our worse POTUS.

As for my the quotes you have researched, yea I said those things. Which made sense to me at the time but may or may not have not been good analysis. I say some of those things to find out whether my opinions are valid simply by response by you and others. In the final analysis what I may have said in my past may not perfectly reflect how I might feel today. All of us change our opinions over time. Because the world is dynamic in the first place...there are a lot of things that change with the world and my views will also change with the world as I become more experienced in it. You can also rest assured that I vote for my own interest which in most cases means gainful employment.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

So Im a political atheist on an atheist forum.

You are absolutely nothing of the sort. Anyone can look at your posts and clearly see you favour one side more than the other. You are as impartial as Tim Pool or Russel Brand and I know you know who they are.

Lets look at my voting history then. Since I was old enough to vote, I cast for the following: Carter, Reagan (both terms), Ross Perot, Clinton (2nd term), Al Gore, Kerry, Obama (both terms), and Trump (both terms)

So that is about as politically athiest as you can get. Some conservatives, Reagan and Trump but mostly a lot of left guys like Carter, Kerry, Gore plus 1 term of Clinton.

Trump isn't a conservative. He isn't even political.

If anything you would call me more lefty and liberal based on actual voting history. Note also that had Sanders made it to the ticket I would have surely voted for him over Trump both terms. I never voted for a Bush and thought (still believe) he was our worse POTUS.

As for my the quotes you have researched, yea I said those things. Which made sense to me at the time but may or may not have not been good analysis. I say some of those things to find out whether my opinions are valid simply by response by you and others. In the final analysis what I may have said in my past may not perfectly reflect how I might feel today. All of us change our opinions over time.

Except your recent posts trying to cover Trump and his insane Truth Social postings on suspending the Constitution really implies you've done little growing mentally on the subject of Trump. The fact you voted for the guy a second time really implies you've done no growing at all. You are talking about learning, but you made it seem like Trump made things better, continued making it better, and despite all the lies, Covid-19 denial, Ukraine rat phucking, NK Bromance... you still thought he was the guy to go with.

Because the world is dynamic in the first place...there are a lot of things that change with the world and my views will also change with the world as I become more experienced in it. You can also rest assured that I vote for my own interest which in most cases means gainful employment.

And Trump didn't help there either. But he did help cause a nursing shortage... so if you get trained, there is always that and you can thank Trump for it.

 

[Toni]

The Hatch Act limits political activities state and local employees may engage in while in the employ of the government:

https://osc.gov/Documents/Outreach%20and%20Training/Handouts/A%20Guide%20to%20the%20Hatch%20Act%20for%20Federal%20Employees.pdf

In addition to the prohibitions discussed herein, federal employees in the following agencies, divisions, or positions are “further restricted” under the Hatch Act and cannot take an active part in political management or political campaigns (i.e., engage in political activity in concert with a political party, candidate for partisan political office, or partisan political group):  Election Assistance Commission  Federal Election Commission  Office of the Director of National Intelligence  Central Intelligence Agency  Defense Intelligence Agency  National Geospatial Intelligence Agency  National Security Agency  National Security Council  National Security Division (DOJ)  Criminal Division (DOJ)  Federal Bureau of Investigation  Secret Service  Office of Criminal Investigation (IRS)  Office of Investigative Programs (Customs)  Office of Law Enforcement (ATF)  Merit Systems Protection Board  U.S. Office of Special Counsel  Career members of the Senior Executive Service  Administrative law judges, administrative appeals judges, and contract appeals board members.

 

[Patooka]

This is such a pathetic hill for Q-tards to die on.

 

[Patooka]

Bumpity

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/12/12/tech/twitter-files-yoel-roth/index.html

Twitter’s former head of trust and safety has fled his home due to an escalation in threats resulting from Elon Musk’s campaign of criticism against him, a person familiar with the matter told CNN on Monday.

Yoel Roth, who resigned from the social media company in November, has in recent weeks faced a storm of attacks and threats of violence following the release of the so-called “Twitter Files” — internal Twitter communications that new owner Musk has released through journalists including Matt Taibbi and Bari Weiss.

This is why I have zero time for Q-tards.