Arctish
Centimillionaire
There is no rational reason that it necessarily makes more sense to conclude the victims deserved their deaths unless one is looking for any reason to excuse the IDF.Note that you are taking it as a given that the soccer players and the shooters are different people. It makes much more sense if they are one in the same.
Occam's Razor.
We have a missile coming from that location. They were of an age to be combatants. They didn't leave when they saw a missile team setting up (and they certainly should have!) The simplest explanation is that they were the missile crew.
An anti-tank round came from that direction, therefore it's safe to presume everyone in the area was complicit and deserved to die? Suspicion of involvement is as good as proof?
What happens when a missile comes from the direction of Israel? What happens when it's Israeli teenagers near where it was fired? It's okay for Hamas to kill them, right? Because if they aren't in the IDF already, they soon will be, right?
Like I said in the other thread, that door swings both ways. You might want to think carefully about opening it.
Last edited: