Tigers!
Contributor
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2005
- Messages
- 5,184
- Location
- On the wing, waiting for a kick.
- Basic Beliefs
- Bible believing revelational redemptionist (Baptist)
If the fighting in Gaza, Lebanon does not cease then your proposal is not much good.That would be a great deal for Hamas but that’s not what I proposed. As a first step, I proposed stop building and arresting some settlers implicated in violence in exchange fir a live hostage. That was it. Israel’s steps are reversible if they don’t work.What will happen to the rest of the hostages?Perhaps the issue with your hasty ill-considered response is that a show of good faith is necessary to build trust to proceed to more extensive exchange or do you think parties that have a long history of mistrust will instantaneously start hugging and trusting each other?One live hostage? Very generous of you. That's not a show of good faith. That is spitting in the faces of the other hostages and their families.IMO, a game changing offer to leave the West Bank in exchange for live hostages. As a show of good intentions, stop any building and atrest any settlers implicated in violence. In return, get one live hostage as a show of Hamas’s good faith.
Israel has evacuated the west bank, arrested some settlers, presumably stopped bombing in Gaza for one hostage. Hamas will not need to do anything else. And still have the rest of the hostages. Good deal for them.
If settlers are guilty of killing others then by all means prosecute them.
And to say it again, for the upteemth time - the settlements in the West Bank must be stopped in the current climate.