Jayjay
Contributor
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2002
- Messages
- 7,173
- Location
- Finland
- Basic Beliefs
- An accurate worldview or philosophy
Like I said before, Russia can counter the HIMARS to some degree by decentralizing its ammunition and fuel depots. Which is actually what Ukraine has done already earlier. I think we'll see in a week or latest in two, if Russia is able to resume their operations or not. Ukraine hasn't yet been able to translate this into actual territorial gains, and Ukraine is pretty exhausted too after losing Severodonetsk and Lysychansk.
On Friday, the Pentagon pledged four more of the Lockheed Martin systems, which would bring Ukraine’s total to an even dozen. The HIMARS are part of a $400 million package of arms and ammunition that includes 1,000 rounds of 155 mm artillery shells, which are said to have greater precision.
Despite the small number of HIMARS in the battle, they are having an outsize impact, according to Ukrainian Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov. “HIMARS have already made a HUUUGE difference on the battlefield,” Reznikov tweeted over the weekend. “More of them as well as [US] ammo & equipment will increase our strength and help to demilitarize the terrorist state.”
In recent weeks, Ukrainian forces have used the deadly-accurate HIMARS system to target Russian ammunition depots, destroying as many as 20, according to media reports from Kyiv and social media posts.
Even if Russia can fix its ammunition depot problem, Ukraine will continue to have the ability to strike any stationary target within about 75km from the front line. So if there are no big enough ammo dumps, they can hit bridges, railroads, and buildings. HIMARS are definitely a game changer, but I don't think it's enough all by itself.