barbos
Contributor
There is no evidence of that.Moskva was hit by two Ukrainian drones.
There is no evidence of that.Moskva was hit by two Ukrainian drones.
No, NATO ships are usually followed by fighter-bombers.I recently read a comment from an ex-US naval officer that American ships operating in the Black Sea in years past were shadowed by Russian Follower war ships.
Bob, literally everyone in the world disagrees with you. Go back to frothing about zombies, at least that was entertaining.According to KGB records, you are british. And for all intents and purposes Australia is both EU and NATO country.I am not only not an American; I don't even live in a NATO country.
Most likely its self defense systems were old and had no significant (costly) updates which means they were more maintenance intensive. Were their technicians up to snuff? Perhaps, if Russia puts officers with engineering degrees in these positions as some countries do. US, GB, AU train enlisted to do the job. Did Russian technicians have the repair parts support needed? Probably not. Budgets were likely very tight. Did they have functioning test equipment to perform maintenance? Here again, probably not. Navy ships are hard on test equipment and old defense systems require a lot of peaking and tweaking. e.g., shaping and flattening the transmitted pulse, aligning radar timing pulses. Old systems are a pain in the ass that want constant attention.The Moskova went down because it's defenses weren't up to the job and it's damage resistance was horrible.
To say it was just a fire instead of we were sunk by the enemy is more embarrassing. This speaks volumes of the material condition of the ship and the ability of the crew to fight the ship.Again, Ukraine has nothing to do with Moskva. It was a fire.
Hopefully it was their carrier.Back in nineteen hundred and eighty nine, while in Shanghai, I walked a Chinese navy ship with tape over rust holes and paint over the tape. I've every confidence Russian navy ships are still this bad.
Just some crappy little destroyer or frigate. They had nothing of significance back then that I'm aware of.Hopefully it was their carrier.Back in nineteen hundred and eighty nine, while in Shanghai, I walked a Chinese navy ship with tape over rust holes and paint over the tape. I've every confidence Russian navy ships are still this bad.
that is so freaking funny! But it also demonstrates the level of denial that Barbos is in. And I must assume that most Russians feel the same. And it also demonstrates the level of hatred the Russians have for Ukraine. If a future peace settlement is found, it must not be a temporary one that allows Russia to rearm while Ukraine cannot. Because it is clear to me that Putler and the Russians want to wipe out Ukraine and steal all their resources (including their children). As an aside, might be a good thread to ask what the fuck the Russians are doing with the Ukrainian children that they kidnapped.Nope.The Moskova went down because it's defenses weren't up to the job and it's damage resistance was horrible.
She was designed for sub-surface operation and is performing admirably in her assigned role, according to the fish who live in her.
Barbos and his fellow Barbossians live in a world that is at least a century behind the times. This is feudalism with tanks, guns, ships and no legacy of law. There are a few places on the planet that are similar.that is so freaking funny! But it also demonstrates the level of denial that Barbos is in. And I must assume that most Russians feel the same. And it also demonstrates the level of hatred the Russians have for Ukraine. If a future peace settlement is found, it must not be a temporary one that allows Russia to rearm while Ukraine cannot. Because it is clear to me that Putler and the Russians want to wipe out Ukraine and steal all their resources (including their children). As an aside, might be a good thread to ask what the fuck the Russians are doing with the Ukrainian children that they kidnapped.Nope.The Moskova went down because it's defenses weren't up to the job and it's damage resistance was horrible.
She was designed for sub-surface operation and is performing admirably in her assigned role, according to the fish who live in her.
Dima Nova, whose real name was Dmitry Svirgunov, was the founder of the popular group Cream Soda. Their song 'Aqua Disco' criticised Putin's lavish mansion which is thought to be worth $1.3 billion and became an anthem sung at anti-war protests in Russia. The protests were soon called 'Aqua Disco Parties'.
Barbie has a point. Brits, Americans, Argentinians - pretty much anyone else - would be mortified about getting their ass kicked by a Country with a tenth of their population. But not Mama Russia, nosiree!!These are british, they are easily embarrassed.When Argentina destroyed the HMS Sheffield, the Royal Navy were seriously embarrassed,
So two fires very far away from each other just happened to start at the same time.There is no evidence of that.Moskva was hit by two Ukrainian drones.
Not really. I only questioned it because most of the Russian propaganda you regurgitate here turns out to be false.It was to you, cause you decided to question it.Him being in Italy wasn't really the important part.
I did find it and it turned to be fake.Then go and find it. I am not chasing every anti-russia giovernment ctitters turning "pro-russia" once they leave the office, there are just too many of them.Him switching sides and allegedly starting to become friends with Russia was.
Fire caused by missiles fired by Ukraine. Duh.Sinking Russia's flagship Moskva.
Kicking Russians out of Snake Island.
Kicking Russian occupiers out of (most of) Kharkiv region.
Kicking Russian occupiers out of right bank of Dnipro river.
Again, Ukraine has nothing to do with Moskva. It was a fire.
Repeating false claims doesn't make them true. You've spouted this nonsense about Ukrainian KIA being in hundreds of thousands several times in the past (just increasing the number each time), but you have never given any source or evidence for these claims. And obviously, you don't have any sources, because the number is so ridiculously high: if Ukraine had 200k dead, the number of wounded would bring the casualties to about a million; more than Ukraine's active duty armed forces and reservists combined.The rest, are you fucking kidding me? Seriusly?
100-200K of ukrainian soldiers are dead. Russian losses are 16K. That's from your media estimates.
Yeah, you remember the Island where you said all of Ukraine's counter-attacks failed, and then one day, Russia ran away from? Everything you had been fed about it turned out to be false, and Ukraine did manage to turn it into a kill box.And you are talking about Snake Island?
In case of Alexander Christoforou, it's absolutely justified.That's your go to answer to everything.And a paid shill of Kremlin.
It's got major anti-air capability but didn't even try to engage the inbound missile--the problem is it had only one radar good enough to track a sea-skimmer in rough seas and that radar had a limited field of view. That radar was busy watching drones which weren't worth spending million-dollar missiles against, it never looked in the right direction. The fact that the Ukrainians even tried the shot says an awful lot about it's failings--on paper the Ukrainian missile should have had no chance.Nope.The Moskova went down because it's defenses weren't up to the job and it's damage resistance was horrible.
It didn't have the punch to sink the ship--but the damage control couldn't stop the fire it started.Look, I saw the pictures (no, they were not edited). There is no sign of rocket hit.
9/11 was not easy to prevent. Stealth attacks in times of peace are very hard to defend against.And even if it was actually Ukraine/NATO responsible, so fucking what?
You guys had 9-11, you suck, you couldn't prevent what could have easily been prevented. You suck!
Your other fleets aren't much better.Well, basically yes, Certainly Black Sea one. Everybody knows that in Russia.So the vaunted Russian Navy is a paper tiger
Black Sea itself is an overstatement, as far as navy concerned it's a lake.
And Surface Navy in general are all nothing but target practice, all of them, including american.
You in Australia should know that, you just spent shitload of money on subs.