How should west respond to potential (likely) Russian invasion of Ukraine?

[Jimmy Higgins]

Meanwhile, Green Goblin in Kiev responded to the latest talk from Slovakia's PM Robert Fico.
Green Goblin accused Fico in opening second front against Ukraine. Nice, need more popcorn.

Odd how Russia has failed to defeat the dope of Ukraine.

 

[Elixir]

Meanwhile, Green Goblin in Kiev responded to the latest talk from Slovakia's PM Robert Fico.
Green Goblin accused Fico in opening second front against Ukraine. Nice, need more popcorn.

Odd how Russia has failed to defeat the dope of Ukraine.

Never fear, Pootey'll beat him with his Uber-Dope (Trump).

 

[SLD]

How is a defensive reaction a determination to provoke war?

There is nothing defensive about NATO expansion in violation of even respective countries wishes, not to mention explicit ignoring of their own promises and other side concerns, NATO is an utterly corrupt and aggressive organization.

So wait . . . If NATO tries to stop a Russian ship from damaging an Estonian undersea power cable that’s aggression? But damaging the cable is not?

And its aggression of a country wants to join NATO? Against who exactly?

 

[Loren Pechtel]

You guys need the money you're getting from exports.

No we don't. We need to manufacture everything we need ourselves.

You have been trying for decades and haven't succeeded.

Note how both Russia and China have aped the Space Shuttle despite the fact that Columbia showed the concept to be fundamentally flawed.

 

[barbos]

Meanwhile, Green Goblin in Kiev responded to the latest talk from Slovakia's PM Robert Fico.
Green Goblin accused Fico in opening second front against Ukraine. Nice, need more popcorn.

Odd how Russia has failed to defeat the dope of Ukraine.

Odd how you lost in Afghanistan, Vietnam, Korea, Syria, Cuba.
We are not fighting Dope in Kiev. We are fighting Collective West, which decided to attack us using proxy.
And you are losing.

 

[barbos]

How is a defensive reaction a determination to provoke war?

There is nothing defensive about NATO expansion in violation of even respective countries wishes, not to mention explicit ignoring of their own promises and other side concerns, NATO is an utterly corrupt and aggressive organization.

So wait . . . If NATO tries to stop a Russian ship from damaging an Estonian undersea power cable that’s aggression? But damaging the cable is not?

And its aggression of a country wants to join NATO? Against who exactly?

There is absolutely no evidence that it was nothing more than accident. We don't even know if you got right ship.
But we do know that NordStream was a sabotage and we do know that US did it.

 

[barbos]

You guys need the money you're getting from exports.

No we don't. We need to manufacture everything we need ourselves.

You have been trying for decades and haven't succeeded.

First of all, USSR more less succeeded. Second of all, China absolutely succeeded.

Note how both Russia and China have aped the Space Shuttle despite the fact that Columbia showed the concept to be fundamentally

China? How is that relevant to anything anyway?

flawed.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

So the Russian idiots shot down a passenger plane.
Damage inside and outside the plane indicated that Russian air defence active in Grozny may have caused the crash.
That’s the way I read it.

*another

Don't forget MH17.

This one makes three.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

American idiots shoot down passenger aircrafts too.
In this particular case pilots appears were not aware that they were shot.
They reported bird strike and the aircraft appeared to be under control until much later.
The question is, why they were not diverted immediately once the ukro-terrorist attack was detected.

So you admit Russia is the Nazis? Because this was a Russian missile, not a Ukrainian one.

As for reporting a bird strike--what's more likely, bird strike or hit by a missile? Both will seem to be the plane hit something, they aren't going to go out and examine things to figure it out. If the missile ripped fragments through the airplane they will know, but if it simply ate an engine all they'll know is the engine blew. Missile? Bird? Fish? Snake? They'll go with the most likely, bird. (And while I've never heard of a fish or a snake bringing down a plane such collisions do happen.)

And the problem was caused by your GPS jamming.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Meanwhile, Green Goblin in Kiev responded to the latest talk from Slovakia's PM Robert Fico.
Green Goblin accused Fico in opening second front against Ukraine. Nice, need more popcorn.

Odd how Russia has failed to defeat the dope of Ukraine.

Odd how you lost in Afghanistan, Vietnam, Korea, Syria, Cuba.

Afghanistan and Vietnam weren't odd at all. Afghanistan could have been doomed from the outset, but the Neocons blundered it because they didn't care about terrorism nearly as much as Hussein and whatever specific bug up their arses they had with their former ally. Vietnam was against a hardened military that had already beat South Vietnam and France. It was a dumbass mistake to get involved there. Korea should have been a draw, but some dumbass in the military spooked China.

Depending on how one manages it, we technically have a winning record in Cuba. At worst 50-50.

We are not fighting Dope in Kiev. We are fighting Collective West, which decided to attack us using proxy.

If Russia was fighting NATO, the death toll for both sides would be unfathomable.

And you are losing.

I suppose, but we've been "losing" the war for years now. How much more losing is needed for Russia to win?

 

[Loren Pechtel]

I’d love to hear better alternatives to encouraging Russian aggression.

You (the west or Deep state more specifically) can start by stopping lying. Then starting to keep your promises.
Of course that's not going to happen becasue Deep State would have to cease to exist for that to happen.
Deep State can not admit making a boo-boo with their plan to destroy Russia. They will quadruple down on BS.

Why in the world would NATO plan to destroy Russia? You're doing a fine job of it yourself and I'm sure you're aware of the old adage about not interrupting an enemy while they're making a mistake.

 

[barbos]

American idiots shoot down passenger aircrafts too.
In this particular case pilots appears were not aware that they were shot.
They reported bird strike and the aircraft appeared to be under control until much later.
The question is, why they were not diverted immediately once the ukro-terrorist attack was detected.

So you admit Russia is the Nazis? Because this was a Russian missile, not a Ukrainian one.

You are confused, Ukrainian side are Nazi, russian side are russian.

As for reporting a bird strike--what's more likely, bird strike or hit by a missile?

You need to check your reading comprehension, I never said it was a bird strike.

Both will seem to be the plane hit something, they aren't going to go out and examine things to figure it out. If the missile ripped fragments through the airplane they will know, but if it simply ate an engine all they'll know is the engine blew. Missile? Bird? Fish? Snake? They'll go with the most likely, bird. (And while I've never heard of a fish or a snake bringing down a plane such collisions do happen.)

And the problem was caused by your GPS jamming.

Nope, it was caused by a missile hit.

 

[barbos]

I’d love to hear better alternatives to encouraging Russian aggression.

You (the west or Deep state more specifically) can start by stopping lying. Then starting to keep your promises.
Of course that's not going to happen becasue Deep State would have to cease to exist for that to happen.
Deep State can not admit making a boo-boo with their plan to destroy Russia. They will quadruple down on BS.

Why in the world would NATO plan to destroy Russia?

Ask them. I can only speculate. But they admit that this is their plan.

You're doing a fine job of it yourself and I'm sure you're aware of the old adage about not interrupting an enemy while they're making a mistake.

Nice try. but you are projecting.

 

[ZiprHead]

American idiots shoot down passenger aircrafts too.
In this particular case pilots appears were not aware that they were shot.
They reported bird strike and the aircraft appeared to be under control until much later.
The question is, why they were not diverted immediately once the ukro-terrorist attack was detected.

So you admit Russia is the Nazis? Because this was a Russian missile, not a Ukrainian one.

You are confused, Ukrainian side are Nazi, russian side are russian.

No, Russian side are Nazi. They are the only ones invading another country like Germany did.

 

[barbos]

If Russia was fighting NATO, the death toll for both sides would be unfathomable.

Yeah, that's why you choose proxies to fight your wars.

No, Russian side are Nazi. They are the only ones invading another country like Germany did.

No, your side are nazis, and you invaded Russia, We did not invade anybody. The fact is, most of Ukraine is Russia, temporarily occupied by the west/nazis.

 

[barbos]

I suppose, but we've been "losing" the war for years now. How much more losing is needed for Russia to win?

Looks like your proxy will collapse the next year, due to men problem. Of course new administration may choose to end it before that, I don't see Regime in Kiev lasting into 2026, even with all the money west can print.
Frankly it is a surprise that the Green Goblin was able to hold it together that long. I guess he is a good actor.

 

[barbos]

Vietnam was against a hardened military that had already beat South Vietnam and France. It was a dumbass mistake to get involved there.

So mighty US can not defeat hardened military. OK, I will try to remember that.

 

[barbos]

Ownership of Greenland Ukraine is Essential to Our Security

You can't have Ukraine.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Ownership of Greenland Ukraine is Essential to Our Security

You can't have Ukraine.

You said we already took it.

 

[barbos]

Ownership of Greenland Ukraine is Essential to Our Security

You can't have Ukraine.

You said we already took it.

And we taking it back.