barbos
Contributor
Removal of Yanukovich, Yuschenko was a nazi who became president in the first maidan in 2004Removal of Yuschenko and induction of Poroshenko invalidated the treaty.
Removal of Yanukovich, Yuschenko was a nazi who became president in the first maidan in 2004Removal of Yuschenko and induction of Poroshenko invalidated the treaty.
What treaty are you talking about? Ukraine had friendship treaty with Russia which was broken when they (Ukraine) turned nazi.Can you quote the provision of the treaty that rendered it invalid when this change occurred?
I am not talking about a treaty. @aupmanyav is, and I am asking for the allegedly relevant text from this alleged treaty.What treaty are you talking about?Can you quote the provision of the treaty that rendered it invalid when this change occurred?
So, never.Ukraine had friendship treaty with Russia which was broken when they (Ukraine) turned nazi.
Never what?So, never.
He is probably talking about agreement to have elections which maidan nazi and supporting them West broke immediately.I am not talking about a treaty. @aupmanyav is, and I am asking for the allegedly relevant text from this alleged treaty.
I am just giving history a post-event look.Or are you just parroting Russian propaganda?
"Russia and Ukraine had not finalized a border between the two countries. The border was delineated in the 2003 Treaty on the Russian-Ukrainian State Border, but Ukraine has started the agreed-upon demarcation unilaterally after Russia dragged its feet."@aupmanyav is, and I am asking for the allegedly relevant text from this alleged treaty.
US wanted this war. And again, Yuschenko had served his term as president to the end, while being a nazi.I am just giving history a post-event look.Or are you just parroting Russian propaganda?
Had Yuschenko or Yanukovich continued, there would not have been a Ukraine war.
Oh come now. It was not just the British. The French and Italians stuck their oars in the water.Alaska sale was technically legal. In practice of course it was a result of british invasion into .... Crimea.Could do the same with Alaska.
I am just giving history a post-event look.Or are you just parroting Russian propaganda?
Had Yuschenko or Yanukovich continued, there would not have been a Ukraine war.
What treaty are you talking about? Ukraine had friendship treaty with Russia which was broken when they (Ukraine) turned nazi.Can you quote the provision of the treaty that rendered it invalid when this change occurred?
Tell it to your buddy Pootey.But sensibilities of the neighbors also has to be kept in mind.
It has all the rights, but will also have to bear the results of its decisions.So are you trying to say that a sovereign country doesn't have a right to lawfully impeach a President if he is not following their laws? Or maybe they have to get permission from their neighbor?
I am not saying that. US wants Indian market to open for its agricultural produce and dairy products. India would not allow US to cross the red line even if it imposes 500% tariff. We will find other markets or manufacture different goods. But we negotiate things. I think that is the way to do it. We had a skirmish with China. Did the current government give any territory to China, though China is much stronger than us? We sought better relations.You are saying “give them what they want and they’ll be nice”
Gee you’re SOOooo civilized.I am not saying that. US wants Indian market to open for its agricultural produce and dairy products. India would not allow US to cross the red line even if it imposes 200% tariff. But we negotiate things. I think that is the civilized way to do it.
Yes, the whole EU.Oh come now. It was not just the British. The French and Italians stuck their oars in the water.Alaska sale was technically legal. In practice of course it was a result of british invasion into .... Crimea.Could do the same with Alaska.
No, your excuses for this war you side started are complete bullshit.All your excuses for this war are complete bullshit
No, we did not. Even NATO does not agree with your ridiculous claim.Your side yesterday attacked Poland with 19 drones
First of all, he WAS following the law. Second he was not impeached, there was not enough votes and these who voted did so under the guns of the nazi mob. And yes, according to EU own rules they (Ukraine) have to get permission of the their neighbor when it comes to security.I am just giving history a post-event look.Or are you just parroting Russian propaganda?
Had Yuschenko or Yanukovich continued, there would not have been a Ukraine war.
So are you trying to say that a sovereign country doesn't have a right to lawfully impeach a President if he is not following their laws? Or maybe they have to get permission from their neighbor?