Now that we are back on topic, or at least we were for a little while, until y'all went off again, I'll add my rant. I basically agree with Toni. I've also worked in public health back when abortions were not only legal, the federal government paid for them if the woman was low income. They were not for convenience, as far I could ever tell, and the vast majority of them were in the first 2 months of the pregnancy.
I personally knew a woman who had one because her husband was abusive, and she already had 4 children with him and was planning on getting a divorce. She was in the first trimester. I know someone who was raped and opted for an early abortion.
When I worked in public health in a maternity clinic for a year during the early 80s, only one patient chose to have an abortion and it was in the first trimester. That was her decision, regardless of the reason. One of my patients was a 14 year old girl who had been raped but never told anyone, so it was too late for her to have an abortion, since she was about 7 or 8 months pregnant. I almost wished another one had the opportunity to have an abortion but it was too late for her. She came into my office with her mother and said, "I ain't been with no boy". I had to compose myself and simply told her that she was going to give birth in less than 2 months. I always worried about that baby.
Only one woman chose to give up her baby for adoption and because she was white, the doctors who agreed to care for these women were trying to place that baby with someone they knew. Sadly, at least in the past, minority babies weren't or maybe still aren't usually as much in demand and often end up in foster homes or being cared for by grandparents who are overwhelmed. I used to exercise with a grandmother who was trying to raise 4 of her grands, while the mom was in prison and the dad had abandoned them. Is it better to bring these unfortunate children into the world, or to at least offer their mothers the opportunity to end an unwanted pregnancy? Nobody asks to be born, and a lot of poverty stricken children end up in horrible situations. Nobody should be forced to have an abortion, but no women should be forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy either. Nobody has gotten a late term abortion unless the life of the mother is in danger or the fetus isn't viable. There are a lot of lies told by Republicans about late term abortions.
Here's another thing, back in the 80s, a women who was over 35 could be checked to see if she was carrying a fetus with Down's syndrome and then decide if she wanted to have an abortion. Maybe that seems cruel, but many of these victims of Down's aren't raised properly or are given up and then end up in institutions. Plus, when I was doing a nursing clinical as a student in Texas, babies who were born to heroin addicts were only given drugs to comfort them, and they were allowed to die. That did seem cruel, but I guess the belief was that these babies wouldn't be properly cared for by their mothers. I really don't know why that practice went on, or if the chances were low that those babies would survive, but it upset some of us students.
These days it seems we go overboard trying to save very premature babies, who often have little chance of survival and may end up with serious disabilities if they do survive. I'm not sure which is more cruel, letting nature take its course, or giving what may be false hope to the parents by providing very expensive aggressive care hoping the premature infant will survive. It's complicated.
And, it pisses me off when men think they have the right to tell women what they must do regarding a pregnancy. It's none of their damn business what a woman chooses to do, and a nonviable fetus is not the same as a fully developed human. But sure, every fertilized egg must be given full civil rights. /s