JonA
Senior Member
Given the size and scope of questionable behavior surrounding her campaign, is there anyone who doesn't believe Clinton to be personally involved in at least some of it?
Given the size and scope of questionable behavior surrounding her campaign, is there anyone who doesn't believe Clinton to be personally involved in at least some of it?
Given the size and scope of questionable behavior surrounding her campaign, is there anyone who doesn't believe Clinton to be personally involved in at least some of it?
Given the size and scope of questionable behavior surrounding her campaign, is there anyone who doesn't believe Clinton to be personally involved in at least some of it?
I agree.Allegations and accusations cost nothing and are in unlimited supply.
If anything, their numbers suggest a campaign of slander. If she has done one or two of the things she is accused of, then her opponents would be far better served by concentrating on those. That they do not is very suspicious.
If she did do everything she is accused of, then surely one or two of them would have produced hard evidence.
The most plausible explanation for large numbers of unevidenced accusations is that all of them are unfounded.
Given the size and scope of questionable behavior surrounding her campaign, is there anyone who doesn't believe Clinton to be personally involved in at least some of it?
Given the size and scope of questionable behavior surrounding her campaign, is there anyone who doesn't believe Clinton to be personally involved in at least some of it?
It appears Trump's campaign was secretly coordinating with Russians via a server to server connection between Alfa Bank and Trump. We don't know what the communications consisted of, however, the Trump campaign has distanced itself from any criticism of Russia, Trump even insisting that Putin wouldn't enter Ukraine (after the annexing of Crimea!).Given the size and scope of questionable behavior surrounding her campaign, is there anyone who doesn't believe Clinton to be personally involved in at least some of it?
The way I put it, based on the impressions of Clinton at a site, 'A weak, dying, incompetent politician who'll rule the US with an iron fist after shredding the Constitution.'If Breitbart is to be believed, we must accept two inextricably-linked facts:
1. The Clintons are the heads of a global cabal, manipulating regimes and markets with impunity, enriching themselves and their inner circle, and swiftly executing anyone who crosses their path, all the while leaving no visible evidence beyond circumstantial bread crumbs, which they cover up due to their iron grip on law enforcement and the judiciary.
2. They don't know how to secure an e-mail server.
Given the size and scope of questionable behavior surrounding her campaign, is there anyone who doesn't believe Clinton to be personally involved in at least some of it?
... when we consider the credibility of the sources, your fire and smoke diagnosis turns out to be just more smoke.
Hillary has live in a fishbowl under a sunlamp for the past 40 years. If there was something to all theses allegations and accusations, there would be at least a trial. It's never gotten that far.
The "amount and scope" is a direct product of THIRTY YEARS of trying to gin something up. Fairly paltry, considering the HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of dollars of taxpayer money that the Repugs have spent trying unsuccessfully to hang ANYTHING on her.... the amount and scope of the stuff we're talking about makes it hard to accept excuses ...
I was more referring to the DNC's treatment of Sanders and the recent revelation that a CNN employee provided her campaign certain debate questions.
Then there's her foundation and its role in gaining rich people special access to her as a government employee. And of course all the other unsavory things.
While a misstep here and there can be blamed solely on her employees or supporters acting on their own, the amount and scope of the stuff we're talking about makes it hard to accept excuses that she was personally unaware of all the misconduct and that it was all just her supporters or the people who worked for her doing it without her approval.