For some reason, you think any of this relevant. You have no idea what was going on in her mind. You have no idea whether she felt threatened or not. You have no idea whether she knew where her husband was when she moved around. All in all, you are simply making up stuff to fit your "narrative" of what happened. It makes little sense to post an ideal set of reactions and then criticize her for not following them.Effectively imprisoned in the house of an abusive person, with no way to get out. That doesn't really sound particularly safe to me.He didn't follow her into the garage. She's safe.
And if he entered the garage she would have been justified in shooting.
The reality is she ended the confrontation by going to the garage. Anything that happened before she entered the garage is now irrelevant.
Furthermore, even had she not entered the garage telling him to leave was not something she had a right to do--it was his place, not hers. "Let me leave" would have been legal, but that's not what she did.
Nothing was threatening her in the garage. You can't shoot based on unreasonable fears.
She chose to enter the house. New incident, she knew she was confronting someone hostile. She can't shoot.
- - - Updated - - -
Huh? She went to the garage to leave, he didn't follow. She grabbed her gun and went back inside and fired a shot at him. What was his original story?
His original deposition and her story is that she went into the garage. He knew she could not leave through the garage: it was locked at the time. Hers: She figured out she could not leave through the garage. She thought the garage door was not operational. She retrieved the gun to get him to back off so that she could leave through another exit. She had left her phone in the house and could not call for help.
Then why was she telling him to leave rather than telling him to get out of her way?