Will Wiley
Veteran Member
Yes I didn't want to see Australia dragged into another war. When Trump said that he didn't want any more toppling of regimes around the world I hoped it was true.
Trump said:
-
Features
Mueller investigation
- Thread starter Artemus
- Start date
Yes I didn't want to see Australia dragged into another war. When Trump said that he didn't want any more toppling of regimes around the world I hoped it was true.
Will Wiley
Veteran Member
I will wait to see the evidence. Why don't you do the same?
What argunments have I made to say he didn't commit treason?
What is the evidence he is a traitor?
You don't want to see anyone oppose Russia.
Jayjay
Contributor
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2002
- Messages
- 7,173
- Location
- Finland
- Basic Beliefs
- An accurate worldview or philosophy
Never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence. Besides, I seriously doubt any shill would be paid to troll this forum of all places. Twitter, Facebook and comments sections on popular news sites and blogs is where the eyeballs are.
Don2 (Don1 Revised)
Contributor
Last time I checked, Australia wasn't part of the US. We have a thing called a parliament. It's located south of Sydney and before you reach Melbourne. I think George W Bush is a vile cynical callous human being, but it was John Howard and the Liberal Party who dragged Australia into their last war. No one else. Where is your outrage toward them? Or do you think Australia is not responsible or capable enough to make its own decisions with regards to foreign policy?
Opoponax
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2017
- Messages
- 1,384
- Location
- California Central Coast
- Basic Beliefs
- Apathetic Atheist
Your reasons are lame.
Because prosecutors don't get convictions on hearsay.
I actually read the indictment, which I assure I'm more qualified to do than you are. I'm also familiar with how U.S. prosecutors operate and I have a law degree (juris doctorate).
Because they can't. I would explain hearsay to you and how it fits into this picture in its full legal context, but I refuse to waste my time ever doing that shit again (explaining to people on the internet how the law really works). You either won't read it, or will ignore it, or interpret it in some way that makes sense to you and only you. Then you'll claim Stupid Victory after I've spent a considerable amount of time researching, providing sources, statutes, case history, and then explaining all relevant information in layman's terms.
Nope. I fear the level of irrelevance I'd have to experience.
That's okay. I don't want any of your examples.
Don2 (Don1 Revised)
Contributor
Underseer
Contributor
Just the evidence that is already out there is enough for a reasonable person to conclude that treason happened (such as the emails that Trump's own son released to the public, or the Manafort indictment). If you are maintaining skepticism, then you simply are in denial, and I think we both know why.
Again, the world already know that you are a traitor-lover. Why go through this dance to convince people that you aren't?
Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 44,412
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
That should be "Up Next: Was Trump aware of Putin's potential ties to Russia".
*Shocking*
That said, I never thought we'd see the right-wing in bed with Russia.
- - - Updated - - -
Been posting here for a long time. You see all sorts of people. and WP and Will Wiley clearly have agendas.
True, but we didn't think they would be trolled at 12 months ago.
Underseer
Contributor
http://www.newsweek.com/alex-jones-russia-manafort-mueller-697206
This should surprise no one, but Alex Jones has a conspiracy theory about Mueller. Apparently, the only reason he indicted Manafort was to hide the "real" Russia conspiracy, and not because he was confident he could prove guilt in a criminal trial.
This should surprise no one, but Alex Jones has a conspiracy theory about Mueller. Apparently, the only reason he indicted Manafort was to hide the "real" Russia conspiracy, and not because he was confident he could prove guilt in a criminal trial.
Last edited:
Underseer
Contributor
Having an agenda is different from being a troll. A troll would be aware that he is lying, whereas they sound more like dupes who genuinely believe the insanity they spew.
LordKiran
Veteran Member
But don't you see? The problem isn't Russia. The problem is communism!
ElectEngr
Member
Я, например, приветствую наших новых советских повелителей.
Позже,
ElectEngr
Позже,
ElectEngr
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2002
- Messages
- 39,173
- Location
- Frozen in Michigan
- Gender
- Old Fart
- Basic Beliefs
- Don't be a dick.
funinspace
Don't Panic
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2004
- Messages
- 4,204
- Location
- Oregon
- Gender
- Alien
- Basic Beliefs
- functional atheist; theoretical agnostic
Unless you are a troll....
But even if that didn't convince you, his importing of temporary hospitality workers to his insanely expensive Mar a Lago resort should have provided you all the clue you needed to understand his motivations and lack of concern for, or interest in, regular people...actions speak far louder than mere words.
Don the Con is all about himself, and sometimes his family. This pic should say enough:
But even if that didn't convince you, his importing of temporary hospitality workers to his insanely expensive Mar a Lago resort should have provided you all the clue you needed to understand his motivations and lack of concern for, or interest in, regular people...actions speak far louder than mere words.
Underseer
Contributor
Trump isn't so different from other Republicans in that regard. None of them care about the regular guy and only care about making the elites even more wealthy.
funinspace
Don't Panic
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2004
- Messages
- 4,204
- Location
- Oregon
- Gender
- Alien
- Basic Beliefs
- functional atheist; theoretical agnostic
True, but that applies to far too many Dums as well....
Underseer
Contributor
Dums?
Which AM talk radio show did you hear that clever gem from? That's even more clever than saying Democrat instead Democratic. Because they're rats. Get it? Democrats. Haw haw, that is a clever one!