At the risk of teaching my grandmother to suck eggs are the existing gun laws, pathetic as they maybe, being enforced?
There is little to be gained by adding new laws to already unenforced ones.
Could you point out which laws were not enforced that had they been enforced would have prevented any of the recent mass shootings? Uvalde for example? Which law wasn’t enforced there?
I don’t understand the logic behind argument.
Tigers means well IMO, but tends to assume things about the US society and legal system that just are not so. The question
are the existing gun laws, pathetic as they maybe, being enforced?'
I am not implying. I am asking.
... wants to imply that there are sufficient laws on the books to mitigate US gun violence, but they're not being enforced. That is not the case. For example - there are illegal guns all over the fucking place. If the laws against those guns were enforced there would be no illegal guns on the street and gun violence would be lessened. But it's not like someone can just take a decision to magically make illegal guns disappear. Illegal guns are confiscated when discovered, and sought out when suspected. But they're ALL OVER THE FUCKING PLACE, and there are not enough cops in the world to ferret out all the illegal guns in the US. I invite
@Tigers! to come on over and enforce those laws, or design some system that can mitigate the ubiquity of illegal guns without new laws doing away with all freedoms like rights against random search and seizure.