Jimmy Higgins
Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2001
- Messages
- 50,526
- Basic Beliefs
- Calvinistic Atheist
Politically correct feminist decision to put a woman, any woman, on the bill...
What's wrong with Alexander Hamilton anyway?
Derec, poster child for the Status Quo.Politically correct feminist decision to put a woman, any woman, on the bill...
What's wrong with Alexander Hamilton anyway?
Nothing. My problem is not that they said "we are changing bank note designs and we think X (who is a woman) should be on it because of her accomplishments" but "we should put a woman, doesn't matter so much which, on a bank note". See the difference? Kind of like in England where a 2nd rate female writer replaced Charles Darwin because they wanted a woman for political (correctness) reasons.Nothing. What's wrong with changing it up once in a while?
Is the rest of the notes getting duos as well?And they are keeping Hamilton on the bill as well.
Politically correct feminist decision to put a woman, any woman, on the bill...
What's wrong with Alexander Hamilton anyway?
Yup, but who is saying the second thing? That'd be a misogynistic strawman.Nothing. My problem is not that they said "we are changing bank note designs and we think X (who is a woman) should be on it because of her accomplishments" but "we should put a woman, doesn't matter so much which, on a bank note". See the difference?
You can use the $2 bills.Does old currency ever expire? I think I have some $2 bills laying around, can I use those?
Treasury department did by announcing that a woman will be on the $10, and not that a particular woman would be. That shows that their motivation is political correctness and not desire to honor a particular person.Yup, but who is saying the second thing? That'd be a misogynistic strawman.
I think that they should put a disabled, black, mentally handicapped lesbian with an eating disorder on it. Just to make sure that all their bases are covered.
Also, because one of those saved America from that invasion of radioactive chickens and she rarely gets the credit she deserves for that.
England rotates the portraits on its bank notes with regularity. Darwin was to be rotated off. We've had mythological characters and animal portraits on our paper bills money in the past. We simply stopped rotating portraits once the smaller-sized currency came into use.Nothing. My problem is not that they said "we are changing bank note designs and we think X (who is a woman) should be on it because of her accomplishments" but "we should put a woman, doesn't matter so much which, on a bank note". See the difference? Kind of like in England where a 2nd rate female writer replaced Charles Darwin because they wanted a woman for political (correctness) reasons.
It might not be a dual portrait, he could be on the back or in a water mark. And our notes don't have to be uniform.Is the rest of the notes getting duos as well?And they are keeping Hamilton on the bill as well.
I think that they should put a disabled, black, mentally handicapped lesbian with an eating disorder on it. Just to make sure that all their bases are covered.
Also, because one of those saved America from that invasion of radioactive chickens and she rarely gets the credit she deserves for that.
You had to bring chickens into this, didn't you.
They should really reissue the $500 or the $1000.
Maybe put Beyoncé on it.
I think that they should put a disabled, black, mentally handicapped lesbian with an eating disorder on it. Just to make sure that all their bases are covered.
Also, because one of those saved America from that invasion of radioactive chickens and she rarely gets the credit she deserves for that.
But Dolly Parton is still alive. Only dead people can be on bills, so until then, we can't honor her for her sacrifices in stopping the radioactive chickens.You had to bring chickens into this, didn't you.
Ask yourself a question - is a radioactive chicken currently gnawing through your skull so it can eat your brain? If not, you have one and only one person to thank and we all owe it to her to give her the recognition she deserves.
It might not be a dual portrait, he could be on the back or in a water mark.
It might not be a dual portrait, he could be on the back or in a water mark.
It's my understanding the woman will be depicted cooking Alexander Hamilton a steak after he has stumbled in drunk from the pub.