laughing dog
Contributor
Way to miss the point."Unarmed civilian" does not mean he (or she) is not a threat or that the shooting is unjustified.How come when some police officer shoots an unarmed civilian,
You are using hindsight to assume they knew they had made a mistake. The very same sort of hindsight you claim those who criticize the people in shootings of unarmed civilians who posed no threat.Making a mistake is one thing. Persisting in it is quite another. When they realized the mistake, they should have destroyed all the evidence obtained under the "trafficking" warrant and they should not have tried to bribe the sex workers into lying that they were "trafficked" just to avoid having to admit that they made a mistake.
One think that any normal human being would have much more empathy for nonviolent and passive victims (like Tamir Rice ) who end up dead i then thosewho end up embarrassed.How come you and other prohibitionists have much more empathy for violent thugs than for people getting a massage with a happy ending?
Nice to see you back using "violent thugs" to depict people like Tamir Rice or Philandro Castile. Really classy.