• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Obama conspiracy regarding TWA flight 800!

Underseer

Contributor
Joined
May 29, 2003
Messages
11,413
Location
Chicago suburbs
Basic Beliefs
atheism, resistentialism
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/obama-pilot-twa-flight-800-shot-article-1.2186329

See? See? Didn't we try to warn you that Obama was a terrorist Muslim spy sent here to destroy us? This proves that he's conspiring with the terrorists because Barrack Hussein Obama is one of them!

How many more anti-America conspiracies is this terrorist president going to get away with before the sheeple wake up? Shouldn't Obama's secret weather weapon or his secret Muslim ring have been clue enough?

And what about Benghazi?

[/conservolibertarian]

You know, I work really hard to sound like a derranged right wing nut, but it's so humiliating to have to provide a link proving that the real rightists are far more insane than I can possibly pretend to be.
 
I very nearly "unfriended" a co-worker because of the way her friends go on and on and on about Bengazi. For the most part, she doesn't get into politics too much (though she is definitely a Republican), but I don't think I can take the 2016 election cycle if the anti-Hillary "shares" already being posted are any indication.

I did have to unfriend another co-worker in 2011 due to her anti-Obama rants. The nonsense she was spouting was so far beyond reality I genuinely lost all respect for her.

The rabid right-wing truly do seem insane.
 
You know, I work really hard to sound like a deranged right wing nut, but it's so humiliating to have to provide a link proving that the real rightists are far more insane than I can possibly pretend to be.

Actually you sound so good I am beginning to believe that you must be a double agent.
 
Why would anyone go on and on about Benghazi? It's a fairly mundane North African city; about the only interesting thing to happen there was WWII, when it changed hands five times - which is impressive on a global scale, but hardly remarkable in the context of the North African campaigns - a good fraction of the coast did that, as the various sides gained and then lost the upper hand.

You would need to be a serious 'Rommel vs Montgomery' nerd to go on and on about the place - unless you lived there I guess.
 
Why would anyone go on and on about Benghazi? It's a fairly mundane North African city; about the only interesting thing to happen there was WWII, when it changed hands five times - which is impressive on a global scale, but hardly remarkable in the context of the North African campaigns - a good fraction of the coast did that, as the various sides gained and then lost the upper hand.

You would need to be a serious 'Rommel vs Montgomery' nerd to go on and on about the place - unless you lived there I guess.

Not sure if serious.
 
I'm currently watching a coworker being sucked lower and lower into conspiracy. Sadly, because the the whole "NWO, Federal Reserve, Illuminati" thing he's starting to post a lot of anti-Semitic stuff. He's proof that being an atheist doesn't mean you necessarily have critical thinking skills. Sad, really.
 
He's proof that being an atheist doesn't mean you necessarily have critical thinking skills. Sad, really.
Nice of you to acknowledge that.
I tire of the atheists who tell me of their superior critical skills based solely upon their being atheists. Conversely I am told that christians/theists can not be critical thinkers based solely upon their being christians.
 
Why would anyone go on and on about Benghazi? It's a fairly mundane North African city; about the only interesting thing to happen there was WWII, when it changed hands five times - which is impressive on a global scale, but hardly remarkable in the context of the North African campaigns - a good fraction of the coast did that, as the various sides gained and then lost the upper hand.

You would need to be a serious 'Rommel vs Montgomery' nerd to go on and on about the place - unless you lived there I guess.

Not sure if serious.

bilby serious? Oh yeah. :innocent1:
 
Back
Top Bottom