Political Rant Funny Images II

[Shadowy Man]

View attachment 48574

Our new AG to be.

Note that the Wikipedia photo is from 2011.

 

[thebeave]

View attachment 48574

Our new AG to be.

Note that the Wikipedia photo is from 2011.

Yep. No doubt she's much more saggy and wrinkly looking now.

I assume she is not really a transwoman, like the Wikipedia says? I think there is a joke in there somewhere that I'm not aware of.

 

[crazyfingers]

View attachment 48574

Our new AG to be.

Note that the Wikipedia photo is from 2011.

Yep. No doubt she's much more saggy and wrinkly looking now.

I assume she is not really a transwoman, like the Wikipedia says? I think there is a joke in there somewhere that I'm not aware of.

The actual Wiki article doesn't say she's trans. Someone either messed with the image or messed with the article itself and it's since been edited.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

View attachment 48574

Our new AG to be.

Note that the Wikipedia photo is from 2011.

Yep. No doubt she's much more saggy and wrinkly looking now.

I assume she is not really a transwoman, like the Wikipedia says? I think there is a joke in there somewhere that I'm not aware of.

The actual Wiki article doesn't say she's trans. Someone either messed with the image or messed with the article itself and it's since been edited.

It was added and then removed yesterday, based on the history.

 

[thebeave]

View attachment 48574

Our new AG to be.

Note that the Wikipedia photo is from 2011.

Yep. No doubt she's much more saggy and wrinkly looking now.

I assume she is not really a transwoman, like the Wikipedia says? I think there is a joke in there somewhere that I'm not aware of.

The actual Wiki article doesn't say she's trans. Someone either messed with the image or messed with the article itself and it's since been edited.

It was added and then removed yesterday, based on the history.

I figured it was something like that. So what's the, apparently funny, joke about it? If she had masculine features I could probably get it, but she looks pretty feminine to me.

 

[SLD]

View attachment 48574

Our new AG to be.

Note that the Wikipedia photo is from 2011.

Yep. No doubt she's much more saggy and wrinkly looking now.

I assume she is not really a transwoman, like the Wikipedia says? I think there is a joke in there somewhere that I'm not aware of.

The actual Wiki article doesn't say she's trans. Someone either messed with the image or messed with the article itself and it's since been edited.

It was added and then removed yesterday, based on the history.

I figured it was something like that. So what's the, apparently funny, joke about it? If she had masculine features I could probably get it, but she looks pretty feminine to me.

It was just funny that someone put it in her Wikipedia article. The page is now locked.

 

[Shadowy Man]

View attachment 48574

Our new AG to be.

Note that the Wikipedia photo is from 2011.

Yep. No doubt she's much more saggy and wrinkly looking now.

I assume she is not really a transwoman, like the Wikipedia says? I think there is a joke in there somewhere that I'm not aware of.

The actual Wiki article doesn't say she's trans. Someone either messed with the image or messed with the article itself and it's since been edited.

It was added and then removed yesterday, based on the history.

I figured it was something like that. So what's the, apparently funny, joke about it? If she had masculine features I could probably get it, but she looks pretty feminine to me.

It was just funny that someone put it in her Wikipedia article. The page is now locked.

I don’t think it’s funny.

But I mentioned the date of the photo simply because Wikipedia usually uses recent photos on people’s pages but it seems there may be a vanity issue here to use such an old photo for a public figure.