Shadowy Man
Contributor
Note that the Wikipedia photo is from 2011.
Note that the Wikipedia photo is from 2011.
Yep. No doubt she's much more saggy and wrinkly looking now.Note that the Wikipedia photo is from 2011.
Yep. No doubt she's much more saggy and wrinkly looking now.Note that the Wikipedia photo is from 2011.
I assume she is not really a transwoman, like the Wikipedia says? I think there is a joke in there somewhere that I'm not aware of.
It was added and then removed yesterday, based on the history.Yep. No doubt she's much more saggy and wrinkly looking now.Note that the Wikipedia photo is from 2011.
I assume she is not really a transwoman, like the Wikipedia says? I think there is a joke in there somewhere that I'm not aware of.
The actual Wiki article doesn't say she's trans. Someone either messed with the image or messed with the article itself and it's since been edited.
I figured it was something like that. So what's the, apparently funny, joke about it? If she had masculine features I could probably get it, but she looks pretty feminine to me.It was added and then removed yesterday, based on the history.Yep. No doubt she's much more saggy and wrinkly looking now.Note that the Wikipedia photo is from 2011.
I assume she is not really a transwoman, like the Wikipedia says? I think there is a joke in there somewhere that I'm not aware of.
The actual Wiki article doesn't say she's trans. Someone either messed with the image or messed with the article itself and it's since been edited.
It was just funny that someone put it in her Wikipedia article. The page is now locked.I figured it was something like that. So what's the, apparently funny, joke about it? If she had masculine features I could probably get it, but she looks pretty feminine to me.It was added and then removed yesterday, based on the history.Yep. No doubt she's much more saggy and wrinkly looking now.Note that the Wikipedia photo is from 2011.
I assume she is not really a transwoman, like the Wikipedia says? I think there is a joke in there somewhere that I'm not aware of.
The actual Wiki article doesn't say she's trans. Someone either messed with the image or messed with the article itself and it's since been edited.
I don’t think it’s funny.It was just funny that someone put it in her Wikipedia article. The page is now locked.I figured it was something like that. So what's the, apparently funny, joke about it? If she had masculine features I could probably get it, but she looks pretty feminine to me.It was added and then removed yesterday, based on the history.Yep. No doubt she's much more saggy and wrinkly looking now.Note that the Wikipedia photo is from 2011.
I assume she is not really a transwoman, like the Wikipedia says? I think there is a joke in there somewhere that I'm not aware of.
The actual Wiki article doesn't say she's trans. Someone either messed with the image or messed with the article itself and it's since been edited.
A very quick google search can provide you with all the context you need. But I'll give you a hint; it would be like if Fred Phelp's wiki bio stated he was the first openly gay Baptist preacher.I figured it was something like that. So what's the, apparently funny, joke about it? If she had masculine features I could probably get it, but she looks pretty feminine to me.
Wait, you mean that’s not what donations are for??She's the one that dropped a case against Trump after trump gave her a big "donation".
That's because neutering only removes the testicles, not the penis.
FTFY.Why to not rely on AI forfactcheckinganything.