• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Politico: Young Republicans New Hitler Youth Brigade

‘I love Hitler’: Leaked messages expose Young Republicans’ racist chat

NEW YORK — Leaders of Young Republican groups throughout the country worried what would happen if their Telegram chat ever got leaked, but they kept typing anyway.

They referred to Black people as monkeys and “the watermelon people” and mused about putting their political opponents in gas chambers. They talked about raping their enemies and driving them to suicide and lauded Republicans who they believed support slavery.

William Hendrix, the Kansas Young Republicans’ vice chair, used the words “n--ga” and “n--guh,” variations of a racial slur, more than a dozen times in the chat. Bobby Walker, the vice chair of the New York State Young Republicans at the time, referred to rape as “epic.” Peter Giunta, who at the time was chair of the same organization, wrote in a message sent in June that “everyone that votes no is going to the gas chamber.”

Giunta was referring to an upcoming vote on whether he should become chair of the Young Republican National Federation, the GOP’s 15,000-member political organization for Republicans between 18 and 40 years old.

“Im going to create some of the greatest physiological torture methods known to man. We only want true believers,” he continued.

Two members of the chat responded. (Go to the link to see the bigotry first hand.)

“I’m ready to watch people burn now,” Annie Kaykaty, New York’s national committee member, said.

The exchange is part of a trove of Telegram chats — obtained by POLITICO and spanning more than seven months of messages among Young Republican leaders in New York, Kansas, Arizona and Vermont. The chat offers an unfiltered look at how a new generation of GOP activists talk when they think no one is listening.
1760478159977.png

These are the up and comers of the Republican party. Makes me wonder what the ones already high in the party say in the darkness.
 
What is it you want me to add to what I've already repeatedly said? A plague on both your houses.

There is no "both sides" here.
The Democrats are running a communist for mayor of New York City. He'll probably win.
A plaque on the houses of those who cannot distinguish between communists and socialists!
:consternation1: You want a plague on your own house? Takes all kinds, I guess.

Seriously, dude, how long have we known each other? If I couldn't distinguish between communists and socialists, don't you think it's the far more nationally prominent Bernie and AOC I would have brought up, instead of some dinky mayoral candidate? They're socialists. I didn't call them communists because I have an aversion to making claims I can't prove. After all the run-ins we've had, if you didn't anticipate I could back up what I said about Mamdani then you're looking like a slow learner.


"them: so what kind of mayor does nyc need right now?

me:

CPI(M) Puducherry ☭
@pycpim
·
Dec 25, 2020
Comrade Arya Rajendran*, age 21 new Mayor of Thiruvananthapuram , Kerala. She will be the youngest mayor of a major city in the world. Here she leads a detachment of Red Volunteers in @CPIMKerala. #CPIM #LeftAlternative #Communist"​

"Each according to their need, each according to their ability"

"If there was any system that could guarantee each person housing, whether you call it the abolition of private property or you call it, you know, just a statewide housing guarantee, it is preferable to what is going on right now."

"But then there are also other issues that we firmly believe in, whether it's BDS or whether it is the end goal of seizing the means of production, where we do not have the same level of support at this very moment."

(* Rajendran is a member of the Communist Party of India.)
 
Jesus fuck, this is where we are:

Us: Republicans are seeking to gas people.

Them: who cares, you're trying to SHARE stuff.

Like seriously, people want to share more stuff and expect the due we pay to society to uplift society, and THATS what you're freaking out about instead of the people pointedly seeking to fucking murder everyone who voted they would rather share than fucking murder people.
 
What is it you want me to add to what I've already repeatedly said? A plague on both your houses.

There is no "both sides" here.
The Democrats are running a communist for mayor of New York City. He'll probably win.
A plaque on the houses of those who cannot distinguish between communists and socialists!
:consternation1: You want a plague on your own house? Takes all kinds, I guess.

Seriously, dude, how long have we known each other? If I couldn't distinguish between communists and socialists, don't you think it's the far more nationally prominent Bernie and AOC I would have brought up, instead of some dinky mayoral candidate? They're socialists. I didn't call them communists because I have an aversion to making claims I can't prove. After all the run-ins we've had, if you didn't anticipate I could back up what I said about Mamdani then you're looking like a slow learner.

"them: so what kind of mayor does nyc need right now?​
me:​
CPI(M) Puducherry ☭​
@pycpim​
·​
Dec 25, 2020​
Comrade Arya Rajendran*, age 21 new Mayor of Thiruvananthapuram , Kerala. She will be the youngest mayor of a major city in the world. Here she leads a detachment of Red Volunteers in @CPIMKerala. #CPIM #LeftAlternative #Communist"​

"Each according to their need, each according to their ability"​
"If there was any system that could guarantee each person housing, whether you call it the abolition of private property or you call it, you know, just a statewide housing guarantee, it is preferable to what is going on right now."​
"But then there are also other issues that we firmly believe in, whether it's BDS or whether it is the end goal of seizing the means of production, where we do not have the same level of support at this very moment."​

(* Rajendran is a member of the Communist Party of India.)
Socialist and communists share many common goals. As do liberals and conservatives. But sharing the same goals does not make them they same.

Even slow learners know there are antidotes for your plaque only work if you use them.
 
Last edited:
The first rule of Nazi club is you don’t talk about Nazi club.
And that’s why not talking about Nazi Club proves you’re a Nazi.
🤤
I mean, it kind of does, when there's a Nazi club, and everyone around you has mentioned or discussed it.

Moreso when you are directly asked your thoughts on it and you deflect.
 
And the second rule of Nazi club is when caught write it off as a bunch of young kids telling stupid jokes even when it includes men up to the age of forty as well as elected state officials.
 
A plague on both your houses
a communist
Lol, a guy who stands to the center of European politics is now a "communist",
Not only now -- Mamdani's been a communist for years. :wink: If it were true he "stands to the center of European politics" then that would be sad commentary on the state of European politics; but your claim is absurd. If he were at the center then that would necessarily mean over half the European electorate want to abolish private property, seize the means of production, and elect communists or somebody even further left. If the voters wanted that they'd have it.

and that's somehow "as deserving of a plague" as checks notes: open celebration of extermination over political views.
Every time a country puts people in power who abolish private property and seize the means of production, those people maintain their grip on power by murdering political opponents -- point out an exception if you can. It is beyond implausible to suppose Mamdani is unaware of this history. It makes precious little difference to me whether totalitarianism fanboys openly celebrate murdering their opponents, or secretly celebrate murdering their opponents, or don't celebrate it at all and are simply okay with murdering their opponents. If it makes a difference to you then you overvalue symbolism.

An economic aim you disagree with.

Actual Hitler living Nazis.

"Both sides".
You say that as though I was arguing communism and Nazism are comparably awful ideologies. You misunderstand. They aren't two ideologies at all. Nazism is the theory that the problems of society are caused by a parasitic minority group and the solution is to get rid of them. The rest is window-dressing. Communism, in contrast, is the theory that the problems of society are caused by a parasitic minority group and the solution is to get rid of them. The rest is window-dressing. They are the same ideology. That the two communities of believers focus their venom on different minority groups is an incidental triviality.

I also don't see "class enemies" being asked to be sent to the Guillotines,
Yes, Madame Defarge only posts occasionally now and it's been a few years since she was openly lusting for that. Not a reason to pretend it didn't happen.

although I do think that great fortunes come with great sins requiring great humility and altruistic follow through, and if this is not provided, the sons join willfully in the sins of the fathers.
I.e., an economic aim you disagree with.

Even then I personally wouldn't want the guillotine.
You said you're at war with Nazis and you said I'm a Nazi, and I should believe you won't have me killed if you're ever a commissar in the post-revolution afterscape? Ah well, maybe you wouldn't -- it hardly matters. No doubt lots of people on the frat-house-farting-contest chat site don't personally want to gas their enemies; heck, lots of the actual Nazis didn't want to murder the Jews -- that's why the leadership kept the Holocaust a secret. It doesn't matter because the less extreme don't call the shots. Even if you personally wouldn't want the guillotine, all it means is you personally won't be put in charge of deciding the fate of sons of great fortunes.

"Both sides".
No, this is calling directly for the execution of political opponents and celebrating the idea of it,
Communists have a higher body-count than Nazis, but I'm supposed to be impressed because they play-act at being humanitarians?

involving a US senator.

I don't see any US senators here on these forums, ya?
The guy's a state senator, and he ought to be censured and stripped of party support and primaried if he won't resign. What's your point? If there were a state senator on IIDB advocating communism, would you argue the Democratic Party should get rid of him for participating in a forum where radicals openly celebrate the Reign of Terror?
Jesus <expletive deleted>, this is where we are:

Us: Republicans are seeking to gas people.

Them: who cares, you're trying to SHARE stuff.

Like seriously, people want to share more stuff and expect the due we pay to society to uplift society, and THATS what you're freaking out about instead of the people pointedly seeking to <expletive deleted> murder everyone who voted they would rather share than <expletive deleted> murder people.
People keep trying to resurrect the most murderous religion the world has ever seen, and that I care more about the hundred-odd million dead people than about your choice to label their religion "share more stuff" outrages you so much you rant and cuss and capitalize and boldface at me, and you think I'm the one who's freaking out?!? I only bothered to post here in the first place because you called me out.
 
People keep trying to resurrect the most murderous religion the world has ever seen
Hands down, far and away Christianity and Nazi fascism.

Quit trying to pretend it's not.

Of course, what else do you have? You don't want to be expected to share.

Crusades.

Exterminations.

Torture and gas chambers.

You are justifying these things.

And you can't just look at the body count, I think you have to look at it as a percentage of the world population at the time, especially in the regions it happened.

You are trying to justify them immediately because you fear that decades down the line, sharing will cause damage despite you saying, all the way to a Nazi hellscape, that we're overreacting!

Of course the "communists" were fascists just like the Nazis; they fought on the same side of the war largely for the same reasons with the same intentions: exterminating culturally inconvenient groups of people who felt they had rights to exist and which the administration did not want to.

Of course, you want to pretend "both sides".

It just doesn't exist.

What you are confusing as Communism is really more just "royalism/fascism" and calling it communism, because whatever community is being controlled by an enthroned king, resulting in feudalism.

At any rate, I don't see Mamdani seeking the deaths of political opponents and you don't have to elect or support fucking Nazis to prevent nationalization of stuff.

Then, all the failures of soviet fascism were apparent, from the fact the regime declared certain theories true rather than studied them to determine truth; was run by a singular individual who had the power to distribute state resources to friends who weren't even skilled in logistics; and they were criminals and killers all around.

That's what happens though, when you let largely unelected people (oligarchs) control a government.

So really, all you managed to describe is the death toll for for what US fascism will become, because the same goddamn result will occur: oligarchs controlling everything in a system with vastly unstable supply and demand and poor foreign relations.

We already have projected famines NEXT YEAR that could make the Irish Potato Famine look like a bumper crop...
 
Last edited:
People keep trying to resurrect the most murderous religion the world has ever seen
Hands down, far and away Christianity and Nazi fascism.

Quit trying to pretend it's not.
"it's"?!? Christianity and Nazi fascism aren't an "it"; they're two religions. You're lumping them together in the hope of getting to a comparable scale. But it doesn't make sense to -- if the Nazi atrocities had been motivated by Christian zeal then Jews would have been able to save themselves by converting, as happened when Spain decided to get rid of its Jews in the 1400s. The Nazi fascists didn't give a damn what religion its victims were because Nazism was about race and nationalism, not God.

In any event, Mao outmurdered Hitler all by himself. If you want to claim Christianity outmurdered Stalin plus Lenin plus Kim Il Sung plus Pol Pot, show your work.

Of course, what else do you have? You don't want to be expected to share.
You're really bad at modeling other minds. You know this about yourself, so you really ought to take it into account when you're tempted to make malicious accusations.

Crusades.
Body count on the order of 10% of communism's.

Exterminations.
How many?

Expanding the discussion beyond murder in hope of inflating the numbers, are you? Good luck with that -- communists were enthusiastic torturers too.

and gas chambers.
And the Viet Minh tied class enemies ten or twenty at a time into immobilized balls of human and rolled them into the Mekong to drown.

You are justifying these things.
You are making false damaging claims about me with malice and reckless disregard for the truth. You do not have an intellectually honest reason to believe I'm justifying these things. You might as well claim Lee Harvey Oswald killed more people than Gavrilo Princip, and then when I point out he didn't, accuse me of "justifying the Kennedy assassination". You're being ridiculous. A plague on communists, Nazis, crusaders, jihadis, and Mongol Hordes alike. And a plague on any Republicans and Democrats who are okay with one or another of the above -- a plague on both your houses.

And you can't just look at the body count, I think you have to look at it as a percentage of the world population at the time, especially in the regions it happened.
If you want to scale by world population I think Islam takes top honors -- Tamerlane murdered some 5% of the population of the world.

You are trying to justify them immediately because you fear that decades down the line, sharing will cause damage despite you saying, all the way to a Nazi hellscape, that we're overreacting!
See above re you being really bad at modeling other minds.

Of course the "communists" were fascists just like the Nazis;
Of course they were -- those are the same ideology, just with a different minority group to blame for all our troubles.

The word "fascism" means "strength through unity". Fascists want each person to submerge his individuality and march to the beat of the same drummer as the rest of the collective, so the collective won't be weakened by internal division and will therefore win its struggle against other collectives. It's why free speech is the first casualty of collectivists. Opposing fascists isn't enough to make you anti fascism -- an awful lot of people who think they're antifascist because they're against some set of fasces are simply members of some different set of fasces.

they fought on the same side of the war largely for the same reasons with the same intentions: exterminating culturally inconvenient groups of people who felt they had rights to exist and which the administration did not want to.
They fought on the same side because Stalin was an idiot who thought Hitler would keep his promises and just give him half of Poland.

Of course, you want to pretend "both sides".

It just doesn't exist.

What you are confusing as Communism is really more just "royalism/fascism" and calling it communism,
Yeah, yeah, we've heard, whatever came before was never real communism so its murders are no reproach against the arrogant assholes trying to rerun the experiment for the umpteenth time. We've been assured the new guys are planning to give us the real thing and not the old fake. Are you the world's worst suckers, or do you just think the rest of us are? When political leaders who want to abolish private property and seize the means of production do so, the result is usually a famine and always a murderous police state, whether they call that communism or not, and whether you call that communism or not. A sewer by any other name smells as sweet.

At any rate, I don't see Mamdani seeking the deaths of political opponents
No, he's merely seeking the enactment of a policy he knows has often been enacted in the past and has always caused the deaths of political opponents, so he is evidently okay with that.

and you don't have to elect or support ... Nazis to prevent nationalization of stuff.
And I don't support them, and you don't have an honorable reason to keep insinuating that I do. A plague on both your houses. And before you charge whataboutism, note that I was perfectly content to let you guys enjoy your Republican-trash-fest in peace, but you chose to drag me into a thread that was nothing to do with me and put words in my mouth. So if you don't like getting corrected, that's looks like a you-problem.
 
Back
Top Bottom