It seems to me that there are a lot of people here who are extremely angry about people bringing up the race angle to this shooting. However, being angry that an innocent person was unnecessarily shot to death by a person, off-duty cop or otherwise, who to all appearances was clearly overreacting? Not so much.
Why do we conclude she was clearly overreacting?
She faced an intruder who almost certainly wasn't complying with her instructions. Had it been her place people wouldn't be upset if she pulled the trigger--where's the overreaction?
This is a horrible "Oh, shit!" moment that a bunch of race agitators want to pretend was racial in nature.
She did NOT face an intruder. HE faced an intruder.
Holy shit what a sick world you live in.
How do you like the photos of your “no reason to think she’s racist” lady friend, Loren?
Let’s see your next twisted assurance that she was only doing something reasonable that could not _possibly_ have escalated because of her feelings about the race of the victim.*
*For those lacking a soul, I’ll explicitly clarify that the victim is the black man here. You have a hard time discerning that.
You're playing monday morning quarterback here.
The situation must evaluated with what was known to the participants at the time.
She believed she was facing an intruder in her own apartment. Non-compliant, probably came towards her. Most people would consider that justified, it would be a non-issue.
The problem comes from the fact she wasn't in her apartment. Now we have imperfect self defense which is treated as manslaughter.