-
Features
"Protester" Misconduct Catch All Thread
- Thread starter Derec
- Start date
So, are they gassing or shooting these terrorists?
If not, why not?
If not, why not?
hurtinbuckaroo
Veteran Member
I believe the National Guard was deployed in anticipation of crowds, but they were not armed. What a shame.
Well, can someone walk across the street to do a photo op or something then? This is ACTUALLY a violent insurrection against your country.
Worldtraveller
Veteran Member
Latest has been the DoD is refusing to send troops or the guard. Ref: Jim Wright's twitter feed.
TomC
Bless Your Heart!
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2020
- Messages
- 8,938
- Location
- Midwestern USA
- Gender
- Faggot
- Basic Beliefs
- Agnostic deist
I remember when Trump promised to pay all the legal fees if his supporters got violent at one of his rallies.
Was that just another lie he told? Or will he keep that promise in the next few days?
He's super rich, he could keep it. If he cares about his supporters.
Time will tell.
Tom
WAB
Veteran Member
After this I highly doubt he could ever run again, let alone win.
But I agree, he should be forced to resign and removed ASAP
repoman
Contributor
laughing dog
Contributor
Because they are Pro-Trump white people.
laughing dog
Contributor
Is it possible to forego "whataboutisms" just once?
Elixir
Made in America
Riiiight. You're a real smart and objective guy, however...
What? Not enough property damage for a pure unadulterated condemnation?
Derec
Contributor
I condemn it unequivocally.
But I also reserve the right to point out the hypocrisy of the Left. All of a sudden rioting and property damage matters. But it was defended since 2014 when #BLm started their rioting campaigns.
Derec
Contributor
I believe what happened today is the direct outcome of downplaying and justifying rioting/violence from the likes of #BLM. I warned then that if we allow those riots to go on, there is nothing to prevent the Right from using similar tactics.
Derec
Contributor
Ferguson: In Defense of Rioting
This is Time Magazine back in 2014 defending rioting, arson etc.
Same author now.
You can't have it both ways. If you say political violence is justified for causes you support, you lost moral authority to condemn it when the other side does it.
This is Time Magazine back in 2014 defending rioting, arson etc.
Same author now.
You can't have it both ways. If you say political violence is justified for causes you support, you lost moral authority to condemn it when the other side does it.
Well, at least no one kneeled for the anthem, thank goodness.
Derec
Contributor
Boo fucking hoo. You support Nazis and terrorists. Nobody cares about your whining about BLM. You'll never have the capacity to know the difference, either. Your posts here are nothing more than throwing poop hoping something will stick.
But on the bright side, this guy got a free podium today. TAKE THAT, LIBERTARDS.
Derec
Contributor
I do not. I never have. You are like Trump in how you deal with disagreements. Or a Sith - same thing.
I have always said that both extremes are to be condemned. But unlike you, I am not an extremist.
I hope he shares the cell with Colinford Mathis.
I do not. I never have. You are like Trump in how you deal with disagreements. Or a Sith - same thing.
I have always said that both extremes are to be condemned. But unlike you, I am not an extremist.
I hope he shares the cell with Colinford Mathis.
You just have no principles, just like all right wing authoritarian followers. Whatever conveniently works in a given moment is trotted out as "principle." You don't have them. The rest of your ilk don't have them. Trump doesn't even understand the concept, and neither do those violent dipshits storming the capitol today. How would you recognize someone who doesn't think like this?