bilby
Fair dinkum thinkum
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 34,277
- Gender
- He/Him
- Basic Beliefs
- Strong Atheist
Nice 'bait and switch', but I was responding to your post where you said 'The police assisted the protesters who broke laws and prevented lawabiding citizens from getting where they wanted to go?It's not some abstraction - allowing protesters to shut down freeways shows that some people (the handful of protesters) are deemed more important than the thousands who needlessly get stuck in traffic. Also all these idling cars is not exactly good for the environment. Time for another internecine fight within The Left.When will people wake up and realise that the law is far more important than the people. Every law must be obeyed at all times, and every single infraction must be harshly punished. The only alternative iscommon senseanarchy.
That police chief needs to be fired ... from a cannon.'
No mention there of the relative importance of different groups of people; or the protection of the environment.
You offered only one argument - that this was between "the protesters who broke laws" and "lawabiding citizens", as though that was a sufficient argument for your position that "That police chief needs to be fired".
This is, of course, untrue - the idea that the law is (or should be) more important to a police chief than the people he is employed to protect and serve; or the idea that getting a number of people stuck in traffic is such a vile outcome that it is worth risking the safety of people engaged in lawful exercise of their first amendment rights, is stupid, cruel and petty, and is the exact antithesis of freedom.
Or are you one of those people who insist that our freedoms can only be protected by our passive acceptance that we must at all times obey those in uniform without question or hesitation? Because that's some pretty piss-weak 'freedom' right there.