laughing dog
Contributor
Of course he is. All females are sluts just waiting to screw a fella, and then afterwards, screw him over.So are arguing now the 30 year old is the victim in all this?
Of course he is. All females are sluts just waiting to screw a fella, and then afterwards, screw him over.So are arguing now the 30 year old is the victim in all this?
Almost everything in this thread is based on allegations. Near all of the allegations come from one party in an ugly custody battle.Yep, that is vile trashiness. You keep alleging that she has requested that she be allowed to live with him; that seems to be something you just made up.
Here's an explanation for the article stating this. It's a lie.The articles state that Barnes was awarded custody because the mother gave her daughter a cell phone. I don't understand the reasoning behind that (also, the mother was fined $500 for it).
You know who else has a lot of pull in small town courts? People who have contracts with the local police department.Almost everything in this thread is based on allegations. Near all of the allegations come from one party in an ugly custody battle.Yep, that is vile trashiness. You keep alleging that she has requested that she be allowed to live with him; that seems to be something you just made up.
But here's one thing I'm not making up. 16y/o children have a lot of pull in family court. It's not impossible that they would overrule a kid that age. However, it's far more likely that daughter wanted that for reasons that don't get posted on the internet.
Probably because nobody except mom wants a ruling from the court of the internet.
Here's an explanation for the article stating this. It's a lie.The articles state that Barnes was awarded custody because the mother gave her daughter a cell phone. I don't understand the reasoning behind that (also, the mother was fined $500 for it).
It's possible that the whole family court is composed of monsters. I find it more plausible that they know more about the reality of the ugly circumstances than you, or anybody on IIDB, know about them.
I don't know if you've ever been involved in a contentious custody battle. But I have. It's a war. And, as usual in war, the first casualty is the truth.
Tom
Yet another unsupported allegation of trashiness.You know who else has a lot of pull in small town courts? People who have contracts with the local police department.
Every single post you’ve made in this thread reeks of your moralistic misogynistic judgement.Yet another unsupported allegation of trashiness.You know who else has a lot of pull in small town courts? People who have contracts with the local police department.
Tom
Do you have a better explanation of why the police treated the victim so poorly after she made her report?Yet another unsupported allegation of trashiness.You know who else has a lot of pull in small town courts? People who have contracts with the local police department.
Tom
Is that your best interpretation of "family court has more and better information than you or I do."?Every single post you’ve made in this thread reeks of your moralistic misogynistic judgement.Yet another unsupported allegation of trashiness.You know who else has a lot of pull in small town courts? People who have contracts with the local police department.
Tom
Is that your best interpretation of "family court has more and better information than you or I do."?Every single post you’ve made in this thread reeks of your moralistic misogynistic judgement.Yet another unsupported allegation of trashiness.You know who else has a lot of pull in small town courts? People who have contracts with the local police department.
Tom
Tom
Accurate characterizations are sufficient.Is that your best interpretation of "family court has more and better information than you or I do."?Every single post you’ve made in this thread reeks of your moralistic misogynistic judgement.Yet another unsupported allegation of trashiness.You know who else has a lot of pull in small town courts? People who have contracts with the local police department.
Tom
Tom
Kind of like your accusations themselves, calling the mother a scumbag.Yet another unsupported allegation of trashiness.You know who else has a lot of pull in small town courts? People who have contracts with the local police department.
Tom
I didn't refer to the mother in particular as a scumbag.Kind of like your accusations themselves, calling the mother a scumbag.Yet another unsupported allegation of trashiness.You know who else has a lot of pull in small town courts? People who have contracts with the local police department.
Tom
I didn't refer to the mother in particular as a scumbag.Kind of like your accusations themselves, calling the mother a scumbag.Yet another unsupported allegation of trashiness.You know who else has a lot of pull in small town courts? People who have contracts with the local police department.
Tom
I pointed out the scumbag behavior of the parents, she's just one of them. Both got drunk in a bar and had irresponsible sex that led to a kid growing up with them as parents.
Poor thing.
Tom
I didn't refer to the mother in particular as a scumbag.Kind of like your accusations themselves, calling the mother a scumbag.Yet another unsupported allegation of trashiness.You know who else has a lot of pull in small town courts? People who have contracts with the local police department.
Tom
linkTomC said:It would be great if scumbags, like her parents, didn't put kids through this crazy crap.
You really don't have any info to know whether her mother is a lowlife or a great mother. But you love presumption.I pointed out the scumbag behavior of the parents, she's just one of them.
Firstly, do we know he was drunk? Secondly, she was 16 and had the baby... no support from you as a pro-lifer though. Just baseless name calling.Both got drunk in a bar and had irresponsible sex that led to a kid growing up with them as parents.
Hospital determined she was sexually assaulted. "Poor thing" might be underselling her suffering.TomC said:Poor thing.
Tom
no support from you as a pro-lifer t
You know it's been almost 2000 years since Jesus's Resurrection?You do know that it has been roughly 5840 days since the bar. Do you mean to tell me that you know what both of these people have been doing for 5840 days? Oh let me guess, one day in the life of people overshadows 5840 days. Cool story bro.
Cliffsnotes?Oh, look. There is a report of the Judge taking a step back.
Judge temporarily revokes custody in rape paternity case after Nakamoto report; trial set for next month
AMITE - A judge at the center of a high-profile custody battle where a woman was ordered to pay her alleged abuser child support has temporarily reversed his decision to grant the teen's father full custody.www.wbrz.com
And holy shit, the rest of the alligations in the article.
Gospel's point that is obvious to anyone with a pulse is that outside of one night, you have no evidence the mother is a "scumbag". And that assumes that one night is evidence of the mother's "scumminess".You know it's been almost 2000 years since Jesus's Resurrection?You do know that it has been roughly 5840 days since the bar. Do you mean to tell me that you know what both of these people have been doing for 5840 days? Oh let me guess, one day in the life of people overshadows 5840 days. Cool story bro.
Do you mean to tell me that you know what His Apostles were doing and saying, 16 years later?
It's a cool story and all. But.....
Tom