Yep. He likes making claims that some religious belief or practice is crucial to human well being and then will just throw out a new strawman when such claims are debunked. There's nothing in religion that can't be had without it and Steve knows that, but for some reason can't admit it.
Social stability is not crucial to survival?
Social stability can be had without religion. Please stop perpetuating the lie that it can't. Social stability can be had without authoritarian cult mentality of a few in power while the rest obey, which inevitably leads to abuse and inequality.
Shared values, beliefs, and practices have nothing to do with religion unless someone introduces religion into the mix, and throughout history, that often happens through force and abuse. Humans enjoyed social stability for eons before religion. And I'm not saying that all was rainbows and butterflies for eons, just that whenever social stability occurred, it occurred without religious bullshit riding on top of it like a parasite as it does today and for the last however many millennia.
Do
you? There is a non-stop stream of religious atrocity running through all of human history.
That is what progessives seem to ingore by proting extreme diversity.
No, we just ignore ideological nonsense that is at best useless and at worst detrimental to the well being of humans. The well being of humanity is
not the goal of authoritarian religion. At best, that is lip service.
And diversity is crucial to all life. The ideological systems that humans have devised, religion, economies, etc., operate by what's in our heads, not by the natural world around us. Societies that are not diverse are prone to prejudice and discrimination, and if it is a religious society of the authoritarian Abrahamic type, abuse and atrocity.
Results are seen daily in the news.
Religious abuse and atrocity is a daily news topic, yes. But I doubt
your news consumptions is diverse. I'm guessing that if your news sources were a society of people, they'd be cut off from the rest of the world, severely inbred, sick and crippled by birth defects, and facing extinction due to lack of diversity.
My perennial qetion is what makes you think a year from now the stores will be filled with food?
I don't know that, especially now with a pandemic that threatens to worsen through virus mutation as well as through human reckless stupidity. There is a real danger of food not being in stores in a year. I just don't think it will be because I believe most people do not want to destroy our government and society because their social dominance cult is not in charge and they've been manipulated by right wing hate and fear mongering to believe this is a realistic or humane solution to anything. It will be because there are too many people who do want that to happen.
That faith is based on enough people buying into a common identity and going to work every day.
No, it's based in enough people not buying into us vs. them identities and going to work every day with thoughts of calling the cops on black people and murdering liberals. My faith is based in the fact that most humans, even most of those who have been manipulated by fear and rage making them support authoritarian ideals, do not want anyone to suffer and are willing to help any human being who needs help regardless of their identity.
This isn't even my ideal or anyone's ideal. It's true. The world and the people around you are not the demons your ideological leanings and "news" sources want you to believe.
Here in Seattle it has subsided but we witnessed leaderless mobs in the streets, ;pitchforks in the street'.
You would have a much more realistic and nuanced understanding of Seattle if your "news" sources were more diverse and your world view more humane.
Religion used to be a thin cap on chaos, unless you wish to argue as some do humans let to themselves will naturaly get along and all will be well.
When we toppled Husein and gave Iraq elections, individual farmed factions arose and began a civil war.
Punishment and threats are effective tools for controlling people. Even mother dogs will bark menacingly at her own pups when they get too excited and she wants some peace. But that doesn't mean punishment and threats make for a useful world view or basis for any kind of ideology other than the social dominance authoritarian cult kind.
By challenging the authoritarian, tribalistic, and ignorance-reinforcing aspects of religion, yes, people will get along much better, much more peacefully. Yes, Big, hard yes. This doesn't mean perfection, though. I know your black and white way of thinking means that if there are any microscopic problems with something you disagree with, it must be absolutely wrong. So no, not perfection, but not atrocity, either.
Authoritarian religion can only be held in check when wider society doesn't allow its stupider and more inhumane tendencies to thrive. There are numerous Christian churches that prove this by their conscious decisions to not allow those same aspects to thrive in their churches. But they don't control the mainstream and even support it in a perverse way by perpetuating the ideological identity.
Today pro sports is a social glue. A big fan event was the yearly NFL draft ritual. People talk about it. Loosing Kobe Bryant for many fans was like loosing a family member.
Pro sports is just as Noam Chomsky said it is, training in irrational jingoism. Kobe Bryant is not your family. He's a sports star who doesn't know you or care about you. But thank you for mentioning this because it is an excellent example of how irrational tribalism thrives beneath a false veneer of family or whatever window dressing backward ideologies provide as the acceptable narrative.
China believes western liberal systems will fail.
If that's the case then China is basing its beliefs on the U.S. and not western society as a whole. Furthermore, current rising of authoritarianism across western societies to varying levels has most certainly solidified that belief. Our authoritarian butt rash, if it continues unchecked, threatens to dismantle any western institutions of progress and human well being.
They force a cultural political and social conformity in schools and politics.
That they do, and their religion is only missing the godhead and dear leader put in its place. I object to any authoritarian propaganda and conformity, whether it's your religious flavor or some other.
I bet you could identify lots more authoritarian dogma and concepts in Chinese culture and politics, which means you could identify them in mainstream Christianity and right wing politics in the U.S. if you wanted to be honest about all this. "Conform to my authoritarian ideology or else," is a common theme that doesn't require a god but does require authority figures that represent one absolute figure.
The big question at the founding of the USA was whether or not people can rule themselves. That is an open question. The glue that once held us together is eroding, and religion was part of it.
Religion still is part of that erosion. But again, every single generation thinks its the end times, that their experiences and world events are the ones that will destroy us all. I suppose their chances of being right are not zero, but literally all of history and the fact that we're still here and spread all over the globe suggest reason for optimism, not to mention all the other reasons for optimism that the world isn't ending. But that doesn't mean nations won't fall or that people won't suffer for the stupidity,
instability, abuses that authoritarian, animal brain tribalistic morons bring about.
What is the nythical beast that eats itself.
Weird sidetrack, but ok. It's a symbol of eternity or infinity. It does not bear upon the reality that humankind learns and changes, and that we can consciously affect our learning and changing as opposed to being trapped in ignorance by religious lies while authority figures and their wealthy sycophants serve themselves.
And Grasshopper, as the saying goes it is about the journey not getting somewhere. A faith in searching for something you can not quite define.
Calling me grasshopper doesn't make you sound wise, Steve.
I agree, though. There is much benefit and joy in searching for something you can't quite define. That is the definition of human endeavor, ingenuity, problem solving, truth seeking, science, love of puzzles and stories, and on and on. Religion doesn't provide any of those things. At best, a sane, humane religion helps nurture those things without fear of change or fear of Other. At worst... well, you are well aware of how religion suppresses and punishes that love of seeking among humans that are infected with it.
I forgot which one, when the Dallas Cowboys won a Superbowl the quarterback commented, 'Is this it?', It was not notionally satisfying.
Well, sports accomplishments don't really matter. They might be readily available tools for people to practice gaining skill and sportsmanship, not bad things in the least, but sports don't really add to the advancement of human knowledge or well being. They're fun, but they're not examples of human curiosity or ingenuity, nor are they examples of systems that have the potential of raising consciousness or the well being of a tribe of seven billion. Just like religion, only a few make it to the top only to find that there is no satisfaction there. Also like religion, people can be better humans without ever playing sports or caring about its tribal nature or stars. Very fitting that you would turn to sports in this way on the topic of rationalizing faith.