• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Redistricting for the US House and the US state legislatures

Thanx, Tigers! Nice to know what goes on elsewhere in the world.


Back to US redistricting.

I wasn't sure about North Carolina earlier, but I am now. That state now has a map. Iowa also does so, that half-competitive half-Republican one.

Wisconsin's "People's Maps Commission" has come out with a map. It makes one of the Republican-leaning districts competitive, unlike the Republican legislators, who proposed a R 6 D 2 map, much like the current one. The state gov't is divided between a Democratic governor and a gerrymandered-Republican legislature, so expect the map to go to the courts.
 
The way you Yanks divide yourself into opposing factions so quickly would make it difficult but you have to start somewhere.
As a start the body is answerable only to the parliament or legislative body that formed it, not the government of the day. No existing, former or wanna-be politicians can be members. No members can belong to a political party or have worked for a political party or candidate, paid or unpaid.
The legislative body created it, they can pick people that will support their position.

Perhaps yours is honest but this isn't proof of it.
 
Nevada has a proposed map, going from +22 -1 -5 -16 to +5 +4 +2 -13

This is to support Democratic incumbents in that state, by giving them some Democratic voters in the Las Vegas area. The existing map has a strongly-Democratic district for Las Vegas proper, and some barely-Republican districts for the city's suburbs. The new map splits up Las Vegas to give its voters to more districts.

Gerrymandering? Yes, and it shows a risk that that activity can have. If one wants to expand one's reach, one may distribute one's most committed voters among more districts, but doing so gives all of them weaker majorities. If Nevada became a little bit more Republican, then all three Democrats could be replaced by Republicans, while with the existing map, one Democrat would be somewhat safe.
 
Florida now has four proposed maps. These maps are not as gerrymandered as aggressively as one might expect, likely because of wanting to protect Republican incumbents. Much like in Texas.

California now has a proposed map. It puts Katie Porter into a R+2 district. :(
 
California: Nov. 15, 2021 - Deadline for commission to propose draft of congressional map

Florida: June 13, 2022 - Date that candidates begin filing for congressional runs (therefore map should be set by this date)

Nevada: March 7, 2022 - Date that candidates begin filing for congressional runs (therefore map should be set by this date)

Wisconsin: April 15, 2022 - Date that candidates begin filing for congressional runs (therefore map should be set by this date)

Katie Porter's district is now CA-45, at D+6. It will become CA-44 at R+2.

She won by 4.8% in 2018 and 7.0% in 2020. So it'll be a tough race for her.
 
Montana, Idaho, and Utah now have maps. No surprise for either MT or ID, but all four of UT's districts are heavily Republican, with Salt Lake City being split up between all of them.

How Republicans Have an Edge in the Emerging 2022 Congressional Maps - The New York Times
“Fear is driving all of this,” David Pepper, a former Ohio Democratic Party chairman, said on Wednesday at a hearing to discuss a proposed map that would give Republicans 13 of the state’s 15 congressional seats. “Fear of what would happen if we actually had a real democracy.”

...
Several other states have completed maps for the 2020s that entrench existing Republican advantages. Republicans in Alabama and Indiana shored up G.O.P.-held congressional districts while packing their state’s pockets of Democrats into uncompetitive enclaves. In Utah, a new map eliminates a competitive district in Salt Lake City that Democrats won in 2018. Republicans have made an Oklahoma City seat much safer, while Colorado’s independent redistricting commission shored up the district of Representative Lauren Boebert, a Republican and Trump ally, so much that her leading Democratic opponent, who had raised $1.9 million, dropped out of the contest to defeat her.

And in Texas, Gov. Greg Abbott signed into law a map that protects the state’s 23 Republican incumbents while adding two safely red seats, a year after the party spent $22 million to protect vulnerable House members.

...
In one of the few states where Democrats are on offense, Illinois will eliminate two Republican seats from its delegation and add one Democratic one when Gov. J.B. Pritzker signs the map that the state’s Democratic-controlled Legislature approved last month. New York is likely to add seats to the Democratic column once the party’s lawmakers complete maps next year, and Maryland Democrats may draw their state’s lone Republican congressman out of a district.

Democrats in Nebraska also managed to preserve a competitive district that includes Omaha after initial Republican proposals sought to split the city in two.

...
Wisconsin Republicans on Thursday passed a congressional map that would shift a Democratic seat to certain Republican control, though Gov. Tony Evers, a Democrat, promised to veto it. Michigan and Virginia, which had gerrymandered districts, have adopted outside commissions to draw new lines. Pennsylvania has a Democratic governor certain to veto Republican maps.

And it’s not clear what California’s independent commission will do when it completes the state’s process later this year.

...
Still, Republicans have far more opportunities to press their advantage. G.O.P. lawmakers in New Hampshire proposed changing a congressional map largely unaltered since the 1800s to create a Republican seat. In Georgia, Republicans are set to place Representatives Lucy McBath and Carolyn Bourdeaux, Democrats who hold seats in Atlanta’s booming northern suburbs, into a single Democratic district while forming a new Republican seat.

Officials in both parties are preparing for years of legal fights over the maps, with the potential for courts to order the redrawing of maps well into the decade. Lawsuits have already been filed over maps in Oregon, Alabama, North Carolina and Texas.
 
Nevada now has a map: +5, +4, +2, -13

California: Dec. 27, 2021 - Deadline for commission to enact congressional map

Maryland: Feb. 22, 2022 - Deadline for congressional candidates to file (therefore map should be set by this date) - the legislature has now proposed 4 maps, with the eastern district (MD-01) ranging from strong Republican to competitive. All the other districts are Democratic.

Michigan: Dec. 31, 2021 - Date by which commission says it will enact a map - still at those three tree maps.

Virginia: Nov. 23, 2021 - Deadline for commission to submit new map to legislature if initial map is rejected - Nov. 30, 2021 - Deadline for legislature to approve or reject new map if initial map is rejected - because of a missed deadline, the state's Supreme Court is now supervising redistricting.

Washington: April 30, 2022 - Deadline for state Supreme Court to enact map if commission doesn't succeed - that body is now in charge of redistricting there also, also because of a missed deadline.
 
It appears my claims that the GOP gerrymandered themselves into a corner were wrong, as they have turned Ohio into fucking Utah! The two Democrat districts... +55 and +40. WTF?! +55 means 77 to 22. My district is one of the only purples, with a +4 R. Medina verses Summit County.

And we have a bipartisan redistricting board... which didn't come up with a map, because the GOP can just delay delay delay and come up with this monstrosity.
 
Massachusetts, Ohio, and Oklahoma now have maps.

Maps of Alabama, North Carolina, Oregon, and Texas are now being litigated over, and the courts will likely decide the maps of Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin.

What Redistricting Looks Like In Every State | FiveThirtyEight
Home Page - All About Redistricting
The cynic in me says "Why bother going to courts about the districts? Let the judges decide the result of the elections. Cut out all those middle persons and save a lot of time & effort"

Truly you septics are stuffed.
 
Illinois now has a map. The map that its legislature agreed on.

Georgia: March 7, 2022 - Date that candidates begin filing for congressional runs (therefore map should be set by this date)

Minnesota: Feb. 15, 2022 - Deadline for final congressional map - its State House is Democrat-dominated and its State Senate is Republican-dominated, and if they cannot agree, then the courts will come in for yet another map.

Tennessee: April 7, 2022 - Deadline for congressional candidates to file (therefore map should be set by this date)

Over in Maryland,

Mckayla Wilkes for Congress on Twitter: "Steny Hoyer, a man who has been in Congress since 1981, is insisting that his personal preferences determine Maryland's district lines until 2032. Even though federal reps aren't supposed to even be involved in the process at all.

We could use some new leaders around here IMO." / Twitter

She's hoping to primary him. He's in MD-05.

Noting
Dave Wasserman on Twitter: "Breaking: Maryland Dem legislators ..." / Twitter
Breaking: Maryland Dem legislators are preparing to advance a modified version of this 7D-0R-1C draft (instead of a pure 8D-0R map) that would leave Freedom Caucus Rep. Andy Harris (R) with a path to victory by excluding blue Annapolis from #MD01. Actual draft coming soon.

National Dems have been counting on Dem gerrymanders in MD, IL and NY to offset aggressive GOP gerrymanders in GA, NC, OH, and TX among others. But in at least MD, they may not end up w/ anything more than what they already have.

Btw, there seems to be a prevailing thought on here that it's #MD05 Rep. Steny Hoyer (D) holding back Dems from pursuing a more aggressive map, which isn't the case at all. Dems' obstacle is (at least) one incumbent from the Baltimore area.
 
Of the states, 6 have only one House district, 18 now have new district maps, 16 have proposed maps, and 10 have no maps.

About Maryland, they are now down to two maps, one of the earlier ones with two R seats, and one of the more recent ones with one R seat, though it is R+8 instead of R+28. The state's district boundaries, old and new, look contorted.
 
South Carolina: March 16, 2022 - Date that candidates begin filing for congressional runs (therefore map should be set by this date)

That state now has a proposed map. It adds some areas to Nancy Mace's district, SC-01, to make it more pro-Republican. Yet more incumbent protection.
 
There Won’t Be Many Competitive Districts Left After This Round Of Gerrymandering | FiveThirtyEight - podcast

Redistricting Has Maintained The Status Quo So Far. That’s Good For Republicans. | FiveThirtyEight
The “2021 redistricting cycle” is about to become the “2022 redistricting cycle.” As we enter the final month of the year, only 18 states are finished redrawing their congressional districts (not counting the six states with only one district), a consequence of the delayed release of census data. Nevertheless, our view of the U.S. House battlefield for 2022 (and beyond) is starting to come into focus.

As detailed on the FiveThirtyEight redistricting tracker, 157 congressional districts have been drawn so far. Ninety have a FiveThirtyEight partisan lean1 of R+5 or redder, 55 have a partisan lean of D+5 or bluer and only 12 are in the “highly competitive” zone between R+5 and D+5. Compared with the old lines, this represents a net gain of six Democratic-leaning seats and two Republican-leaning seats and a net loss of five highly competitive seats.
The Republicans aren't as aggressive as they might be, likely because they want to protect Republican incumbents.

In New Mexico, Gov. Lujan Grisham to formally call Legislature into special session on redistricting | Office of the Governor - Michelle Lujan Grisham

In Connecticut, Redistricting Panel Misses Deadline on Congressional Map, Petitions for Extension - CTNewsJunkie

What Redistricting Looks Like In Every State - Washington | FiveThirtyEight
Washington’s state Supreme Court ruled Dec. 3 that the final maps approved by the bipartisan redistricting commission can move forward. The commission had failed to meet a Nov. 15 deadline to redraw the state’s congressional and state legislative maps, prompting the Washington Supreme Court to take up the task, as required by state law. However, the court said that because the commission had voted to adopt the map by the constitutional deadline, and only missed the deadline to transmit the map to the state legislature by 13 minutes, it “substantially complied with the statute.” The state legislature now has 30 days to review the proposed maps and can make minor changes to them if two-thirds of the members of each chamber agree.

How 538 measures partisanship: How Red Or Blue Is Your State? | FiveThirtyEight
 
Nothing new in 538, but I found this: US. Department of Justice joins legal challenges to new Texas political maps | The Texas Tribune - "Texas lawmakers illegally discriminated against voters of color by drawing new political districts that give white voters more political power despite rapid growth of Hispanic and Black populations, the department claims in its lawsuit."
The U.S. Department of Justice is throwing its weight into the legal fight over Texas’ newly drawn maps for Congress and the state House, filing a lawsuit Monday that claims Texas lawmakers discriminated against voters of color by denying Latino and Black voters equal opportunities to participate in the voting process and elect their preferred candidates.

...
At a press conference Monday, U.S. Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta said the maps passed into law by the Republican-controlled Legislature showed an "overall disregard for the massive minority population growth" the state experienced over the last decade.

"Our investigation determined that Texas' redistricting plans will dilute the increased minority voting strength that should have developed from these significant demographic shifts," Gupta said.

...
Republicans opted to give white voters effective control of the two new congressional districts the state gained because of its explosive population growth, even though the state's white population has remained relatively stagnant. The state's new congressional map also reduces the number of districts with a Hispanic voting majority from eight to seven, while the number of districts with Black residents as the majority of eligible voters drops from one to zero. Half of the 4 million residents the state gained in the past 10 years were Hispanic.

... The DOJ also points to the configuration of districts in the Dallas-Fort Worth area where it argues the map "effectively turns back a decade of rapid Latino population growth and preserves Anglo control of most remaining districts."

Republicans redrew congressional districts in the area with almost surgical precision, stranding urban and suburban voters of color in vast rural districts.
For the Texas state house, "The map drops the number of districts in which Hispanics make up the majority of eligible voters from 33 to 30."

Noting
New Texas political maps intentionally discriminatory, lawsuit claims | The Texas Tribune - "Before they’re even signed into law, the state’s new maps for congressional and statehouse districts have been challenged in federal court by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund."
Filing the first federal lawsuit Monday in what’s expected to be a flurry of litigation, a group of individual voters and organizations that represent Latinos claim the districts drawn by the Legislature unconstitutionally dilute Latino voting strength and violate the federal Voting Rights Act. The lawsuit, filed in El Paso, also challenges the Legislature's new districts for the State Board of Education, which sets standards for Texas public schools.

...
The legal challenge comes as the Legislature rounds out its redistricting work to incorporate a decade of population gains into new maps for Congress, the Texas House and Senate and the State Board of Education. Of the 4 million new residents the state gained since 2010, 95% were people of color; half were Hispanic.

Yet the maps advanced by the Republican-controlled Legislature deny Hispanics greater electoral influence — and pull back on their ability to control elections. The House map drops the number of districts in which Hispanics make up the majority of eligible voters from 33 to 30. The congressional map reduces the number of districts with a Hispanic voting majority from eight to seven.

“Despite having only recently been found liable by a federal court for intentional racial discrimination in redistricting, Texas has once again adopted plans that dilute Latino voting strength,” Nina Perales, the vice president of litigation for MALDEF, said in a statement. “The new redistricting plans are an unlawful attempt to thwart the changing Texas electorate and should be struck down.”
 
New congressional maps cut into Texas’ Asian communities | The Texas Tribune - "Asian and Pacific Islander populations surged in Texas over the past decade, but their political power is weakened under new congressional maps. A northwest Houston neighborhood offers a case study in how that was done."
Language and culture are studied in classrooms of the building the organization moved into in 2011. Political groups work out of its offices, striving to give voice to the ever-growing population of native and immigrant Asian Americans who have planted roots here.

But an invisible line now separates the center from its people. When Texas lawmakers redrew congressional maps following the 2020 census, they split up Asian American populations in both Harris and Fort Bend counties.

One district line, winding between a local car wash and bar, severs most of the Korean neighborhoods, grocery stores, restaurants and a senior center from the community center itself, which now hangs on the edge of one congressional district while most of its members reside in the next district over.

“It’s like (lawmakers) don’t even know we are here,” said Hyunja Norman, president of the Korean American Voters League, who works out of the center. “If they were thoughtful, they could’ve included the Korean Community Center in (our district). But it’s like they are ignorant of us, or they just don’t care.”
The number of new Asian Americans in Texas surpassed both the Black and white population growth over the past decade, but fell behind Hispanic Texans. Vietnamese is the third most-spoken language in Texas, and the half of Texas households that “speak English less than very well” speak in Asian and Pacific Islander languages, according to a report from the Texas governor’s office.

Those numbers gave hope to Texans like Norman that when lawmakers met to divvy up political representation, the redistricting process might yield stronger opportunities for people who look like her to be elected. Instead, Asian Texans lost voting strength around Dallas and Houston, where their numbers have grown the most.

Texas has never elected an Asian American or Pacific Islander to Congress and has had very few representatives serve in the Texas Legislature.
"Although numbers show most Asian American voters nationally lean toward Democrats, a loud but small minority has aligned with far-right Republicans, leading to events like an Indian American car rally for former President Donald Trump in Houston."
“One thing that distinguishes Asian Americans from other communities of color is courts haven’t formally protected them in terms of redistricting,” said Joshua Blank, manager of polling and research at the Texas Politics Project. “Mapmakers have to be careful in distributing African American and Latino populations, but they’re not required to do so for the AAPI community.”

Blank said this difference partially stems from the community’s small fraction of the population, but it also comes from stereotypes like the model minority myth.
 
Massachusetts, Ohio, and Oklahoma now have maps.

Maps of Alabama, North Carolina, Oregon, and Texas are now being litigated over, and the courts will likely decide the maps of Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin.

What Redistricting Looks Like In Every State | FiveThirtyEight
Home Page - All About Redistricting
The cynic in me says "Why bother going to courts about the districts? Let the judges decide the result of the elections. Cut out all those middle persons and save a lot of time & effort"

Truly you septics are stuffed.
Gerrymandering this time around has almost made the House of Representatives static. And unfortunately, after the massive blowout for the Democrats in 2010 because of the expansion of medical coverage, the state legislatures went deep red and have also gerrymandered state districting too. Which makes the Government of the State of Ohio look like Alabama, despite being a purple state.

The passage of ACA was one of the most self-destructive things the Democrats did. You'd swear the bill had all the grandmas and grandpas murdered to save money.
 
Pennsylvania: Feb. 15, 2022 - Date that candidates begin filing for congressional runs (therefore map should be set by this date) - it is losing a House seat, going from 18 to 17.

It now has a proposed map, one proposed by a Republican that eliminates a pro-Democratic district. But between a Democratic governor and a gerrymandered-Republican legislature, redistricting may end up in the courts.

Maryland's redistricters are now considering one map, a map that gives the state one Republican-leaning (R+8) district with the rest being Democratic-leaning or strongly Democratic (D+9,12,18,23,40,50,63)
 
Maryland now has a map. That makes 6 one-district states, 19 multidistrict states with maps, 17 states with proposed maps, and 8 states with no proposed maps.

In Virginia, the court-appointed masters have released a map. It has pretty much the same partisan composition as the existing map, though with the Republican districts more strongly Republican.

Revamped New Mexico 3-Seat Congressional Map Advances | New Mexico News | US News

That map draws the state's three districts as D+4,4,12, with Albuquerque and Santa Fe being at the northern end of the most strongly Democratic district.
 
Mississippi: Jan. 1, 2022 - Date that candidates begin filing for congressional runs (therefore map should be set by this date) - that state now has a proposed map, very close to its existing map.

California has a new proposed map, and it differs from the earlier proposed one by making the three San Diego districts solidly Democratic, instead of two Democratic and one competitive. In turn, Darrell Issa's nearby district will become more strongly Republican.

Here are two Democrats and one Republican from Orange County and nearby:

WhoPrtyOldNewP OldP 1P 220182020
Katie PorterDCA-45CA-44+6-2-4+4.2+7.0
Mike LevinDCA-49CA-48+7+3+2+12.8+6.2
Michelle SteelRCA-48CA-47-2+4+6+7.2-2.2

Signs: + is D, - is R. It'll be tough for Katie Porter and Mike Levin. Might Katie Porter want to switch districts with Michelle Steel?

Minnesota's redistricting is now in the courts, with the Supreme Court's Chief Justice having appointed a five-judge panel for doing it. Four different sets of plaintiffs have now proposed maps to that panel.

New Mexico's most recent proposed map has a central district with D+11, a northern one with D+5, and a southern one with D+4, currently represented by a Republican. Its predecessor had D+12, D+4, D+4, and the existing one is D+18, D+14, R+14.
 
Back
Top Bottom