The time has arrived to clear up all the confusion and reconcile these two opposite principles, which requires that you keep an open mind and proceed with the investigation.
Given the observed reluctance of the vast majority of people to keep an open mind, or to rigorously and honestly investigate anything (particularly themselves); And further given the abject failure of your favourite author here to get more than a handful of zealots to give serious consideration to his thesis, for so long that it has become tired and dated in its presentation, and laughably erroneous in its prediction of its own imminent success within the century in which it was written (which century ended almost a quarter of a century ago):
How can you possibly say that "The time has arrived" with a straight face?
He wrote this because he saw how difficult bringing this knowledge to light was going to be. Most major discoveries are not always brought to light in a person's lifetime. It's unfortunate but true. This was right on the front matter of the book. Do you see how hard this is when you won't even take the time to read the front matter? And you then conclude that this discovery can't be true? You are doing exactly what the author urged people not to do. Aren't you being just a little premature bilby?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please understand that when the 20th century is mentioned, it is referring to the time when this finding was first uncovered. The prediction that in 25 years man would be delivered from all evil was based on the conviction that a thorough investigation would have already taken place. Although it has been more than 60 years, there has been no such investigation and, to this day, this discovery remains in obscurity. Due to the time lapse since the book’s last printing, more recent examples have been added to show how these principles apply to our current world situation, but rest assured that the core of the discovery has not been altered in any way and is explained in the author’s own words. Although some of the references are dated, the knowledge itself couldn’t be timelier. For purposes of consistency the personal pronoun ‘he’ has been used throughout the book. No discrimination was intended.
<snip>
It is important to understand that my prediction of 25 years or that this great change would take place in the 20th century was based upon my conviction that there would be a thorough investigation and understanding of the principles involved, but as yet it has not been. In other words, if Gregor Mendel had predicted that his discovery about heredity would come to light approximately 30 years after his death, he would have been accurate, but he had no way of knowing when it would be confirmed by science. He knew it was coming but could not know when. In my case, however, I was allowing 5-10 years for this knowledge to be understood by science and the political world, taking for granted that the intellectual capacity was available and would thoroughly investigate what could not be denied. I still believe the intellectual capacity to understand it exists today, but to quote Morrison again, “Now we encounter the stubborn resistance of the human mind which is reluctant to give up fixed ideas. The early Greeks knew the earth was a sphere, but it took 2000 years to convince men that this fact is true. New ideas encounter opposition, ridicule and abuse, but truth survives and is verified.” Can you see the problem with regard to my discovery? If it took 2 thousand years to get the shape of the earth scientifically confirmed so that all mankind would accept it, how long do you think it will take to get the knowledge in my book scientifically confirmed and accepted when 98% of mankind believe that man’s will is free and when this belief hermetically seals a door behind which is the discovery that will bring about this Great Transition.
