Because there's one thing I know
I'd like to live long enough to savour
That's when they finally put you in the ground
I'll stand on your grave and tramp the dirt down
Good riddance
Because there's one thing I know
I'd like to live long enough to savour
That's when they finally put you in the ground
I'll stand on your grave and tramp the dirt down
Because there's one thing I know
I'd like to live long enough to savour
That's when they finally put you in the ground
I'll stand on your grave and tramp the dirt down
Good riddance
Just seen his death announced.
I guess he was too weak and lazy.
Well well well didn't think it'd be this soon.
I have heard of him but have never heard him. Seems a controversial figure.
Well well well didn't think it'd be this soon.
For a former drug addict he lived pretty long.
I guess he was too weak and lazy.
Who?
You think their aim is that good?Actually maybe Rush was killed by the Jewish space laser.
I guess he was too weak and lazy.
Who?
Rush Stifflimbs.
Rush Stifflimbs.
Ah, alright. I thought you might have meant me, whose post was directly before yours. And I had written that I was going to check something...
Anyway, paranoia aside,
No, Rush was neither weak nor lazy, as should be obvious to anyone. shitler wasn't weak or lazy either, though he was monstrously evil. If shitler had been weak and lazy, then the Holocaust may not have happened, unless brought to fruition by other actors, such as the major loony Goebbels.
You see what I'm getting at? It does no good to accuse a political enemy of traits they did not possess. It does not further your argument, nor strengthen your position.
Rush Limbaugh may have been guilty of much stupidity and his character could very well be vulnerable to justifiable criticism, but calling him weak and lazy is factually incorrect. He was a strong character and industrious. That does not mean he was not a fool.
I have heard of him but have never heard him. Seems a controversial figure.
I have heard of him but have never heard him. Seems a controversial figure.
I'm amazed to hear of an English speaking North American who has never heard Rush Limbaugh.
How did you manage this feat? There's a ton of entertainment figures I'd prefer to avoid. But I'm not good enough at the internetz to remain that clean.
Rush Stifflimbs.
Ah, alright. I thought you might have meant me, whose post was directly before yours. And I had written that I was going to check something...
Anyway, paranoia aside,
No, Rush was neither weak nor lazy, as should be obvious to anyone. shitler wasn't weak or lazy either, though he was monstrously evil. If shitler had been weak and lazy, then the Holocaust may not have happened, unless brought to fruition by other actors, such as the major loony Goebbels.
You see what I'm getting at? It does no good to accuse a political enemy of traits they did not possess. It does not further your argument, nor strengthen your position.
Rush Limbaugh may have been guilty of much stupidity and his character could very well be vulnerable to justifiable criticism, but calling him weak and lazy is factually incorrect. He was a strong character and industrious. That does not mean he was not a fool.
I'm pretty sure it was a reference to the Texas Mayor who just resigned either directly before, or directly after, comments he made about the citizens of his town being weak and lazy during the unprecedented winter storm that just hit them.
ETA: several have died in Texas as a result of the storm, so those people were obviously weak and lazy.