RussiaGate

[whichphilosophy]

I have the full part here. As the man says, who can argue with authentic gibberish (as the investigation reaches a new file).
[YOUTUBE]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNC3OciAF3w[/YOUTUBE]

When are you and your ilk going to understand that your simple excuses even when you pair them with bad memes doesn't make them true. Also, what is it with Trumpies, your memes aren't funny. I'd at least like to give you credit for something, but funny isn't it. I suppose it's because you aren't very inventive. Your excuses are simple, your reasoning is simple, and your humor is simple, just like the simple mind of the man you defend.

Also, has anyone verified we're not foolishly arguing with a bot? It feels like it more and more as of late.

hi
I was merely showing the whole clip with sound where in reality it mentioned authentic gibberish.

 

[Deepak]

I was merely showing the whole clip with sound where in reality it mentioned authentic gibberish.

Man - you really got me good there

 

[whichphilosophy]

... has anyone verified we're not foolishly arguing with a bot? It feels like it more and more as of late.

I thought that when I first got here. Then I attributed it to scientology brain-rot. Now I'm inclined to put it down to the undeniable simple fact that simple people... exist.

You mean an undeniable simple fact that someone said something that was authentic gibberish. As for brain-rot maybe. I think a leftward government in the UK is the least desirable (vs Tory) in the US a more rightward one is slightly less undesirable. The best state government in India was the Communist government of Kerala.

Capt Bot

- - - Updated - - -

Read this today; thought it was prescient.

"Since in the age of the internet we are all publishers, each of us bears some private responsibility for the public’s sense of truth. If we are serious about seeking the facts, we can each make a small revolution in the way the internet works. If you are verifying information for yourself, you will not send on fake news to others. If you choose to follow reporters whom you have reason to trust, you can also transmit what they have learned to others. If you retweet only the work of humans who have followed journalistic protocols, you are less likely to debase your brain interacting with bots and trolls."
― from "On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century"

Has anyone in the US media read this?

 

[whichphilosophy]

I was merely showing the whole clip with sound where in reality it mentioned authentic gibberish.

Man - you really got me good there

In the UK one of the parties which specialises in Authentic Gibberish. Or could it be fake Gibberish.

[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zz0mlax3jUc[/YOUTUBE]

 

[whichphilosophy]

Too late to revise my BOT.
My comment about the Labour vs Tory should have stated that Labour was the least undesirable

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

You are not saying you disagree with anything in the jingle, though. Your slip is showing, as we say...

I think I expressed my views many times and pretty clearly.

Yup. You think it is all lies and the Democrats are sore about losing, though that doesn't explain Russian Sanctions be codified in Law by the Senate on a 97-2 vote. *scratches head*

 

[Elixir]

...that doesn't explain Russian Sanctions be codified in Law by the Senate on a 97-2 vote. *scratches head*

It's the Democrat Deep State Mind Control drugs. Slip some into their Irish Covfefe and they robotically follow the libtards' lead.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

...that doesn't explain Russian Sanctions be codified in Law by the Senate on a 97-2 vote. *scratches head*

It's the Democrat Deep State Mind Control drugs. Slip some into their Irish Covfefe and they robotically follow the libtards' lead.

I keep forgetting about the Chemtrails.

 

[whichphilosophy]

Here's Putin's response on Russia-gate. It is biased just like any other media but it gives what Putin said



Any comments

[YOUTUBE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5xmt8AFf8U[/YOUTUBE]

 

[barbos]

Here's Putin's response on Russia-gate. It is biased just like any other media but it gives what Putin said



Any comments

Speech synthesizers are pretty great now.
It was cut from the broadcast? I don't really understand why. Putin did not say anything new.

 

[whichphilosophy]

I think I expressed my views many times and pretty clearly.

Yup. You think it is all lies and the Democrats are sore about losing, though that doesn't explain Russian Sanctions be codified in Law by the Senate on a 97-2 vote. *scratches head*

Sore about losing is correct. As for the investigation we an give a definite don't know who did what until it is completed. Speculation or piles of documents in themselves cannot by themselves provide anything until they provide the sequence of events from the cause point demonstrating its effect. The sanctions against Russia provide a joint consensus of stupidity and that it is not always a good idea for the parties to work together (in some situations).

 

[barbos]

I think I expressed my views many times and pretty clearly.

Yup. You think it is all lies and the Democrats are sore about losing, though that doesn't explain Russian Sanctions be codified in Law by the Senate on a 97-2 vote. *scratches head*

So republicans voted for that too, despite being wrong on virtually everything else, right?
Funny thing is, while they voted for that pretty much unanimously, they excluded situations where it would hurt US specifically NASA.
So I think this a clear case of "Follow the money".

 

[Will Wiley]

You see, you have basic understanding and would have been a liar if you put forward explanation different from what you just did.

You're much too kind.

In other news - the folks who have been listening to the closed-door testimony have resoundingly extended the sanctions on Russia, with a supermajority, and requiring Congressional approval to be able to roll them back.

https://www.theatlantic.com/news/ar...sia-sanctions-that-limit-trumps-power/530382/

Because Russia is evil and America is good.

America interferes in the affairs of other nations more than anyone else, yet moronic Americans refuse to see it, and think other countries do it.

America bombs murders and invades far more than anyone else, yet the people who do this somehow convince their idiotic citizens that it's the other countries that are guilty of this.

 

[barbos]

Yup. You think it is all lies and the Democrats are sore about losing, though that doesn't explain Russian Sanctions be codified in Law by the Senate on a 97-2 vote. *scratches head*

So republicans voted for that too, despite being wrong on virtually everything else, right?
Funny thing is, while they voted for that pretty much unanimously, they excluded situations where it would hurt US specifically NASA.
So I think this a clear case of "Follow the money".

Also, if I am not mistaken they put Iran into that bill, and we all know that republicans have a hard-on on Iran.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Yup. You think it is all lies and the Democrats are sore about losing, though that doesn't explain Russian Sanctions be codified in Law by the Senate on a 97-2 vote. *scratches head*

So republicans voted for that too, despite being wrong on virtually everything else, right?

This isn't a confirmation bias fallacy because it isn't in the Republicans best interests to tip its hand that it thinks Trump is allied with Russia over the United States. The US Senate in near unanimity voted to make Obama's sanctions on Russia US law.

That means almost every person in the Senate, regardless of party thinks that:

1) Russia tried to fuck with the US elections
2) Trump wants to reverse Obama's sanctions
3) They don't want those sanctions reversed

That is very significant.

 

[Deepak]

You're much too kind.

In other news - the folks who have been listening to the closed-door testimony have resoundingly extended the sanctions on Russia, with a supermajority, and requiring Congressional approval to be able to roll them back.

https://www.theatlantic.com/news/ar...sia-sanctions-that-limit-trumps-power/530382/

Because Russia is evil and America is good.

America interferes in the affairs of other nations more than anyone else, yet moronic Americans refuse to see it, and think other countries do it.

America bombs murders and invades far more than anyone else, yet the people who do this somehow convince their idiotic citizens that it's the other countries that are guilty of this.

Russia has a history of interference as well, and has had a head start of hundreds of years - by your own rubric your argument is self-effacing

 

[Elixir]

Russia has a history of interference as well, and has had a head start of hundreds of years - by your own rubric your argument is self-effacing

Isn't WW a Brit? Does he forget his own country's illustrious history of imperialism and oppression? Or don't they teach that in the UK?

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

So republicans voted for that too, despite being wrong on virtually everything else, right?
Funny thing is, while they voted for that pretty much unanimously, they excluded situations where it would hurt US specifically NASA.
So I think this a clear case of "Follow the money".

Also, if I am not mistaken they put Iran into that bill, and we all know that republicans have a hard-on on Iran.

Here is one other issue. This is an actual piece of evidence that Trump was in discussions with the Russians over the sanctions. This was one of the first things they tried to get away with once in office, however, Senators Cardin and Graham interceded.

The pro-Russia posters here keep asking for evidence, and yet with this big piece of the puzzle, they just yawn. The Republicans fear Trump is just going to give the Russians back their spy HQ's, for absolutely nothing (well for the US) in return. This falls under the very suspicious column.

 

[barbos]

So republicans voted for that too, despite being wrong on virtually everything else, right?

This isn't a confirmation bias fallacy because it isn't in the Republicans best interests to tip its hand that it thinks Trump is allied with Russia over the United States. The US Senate in near unanimity voted to make Obama's sanctions on Russia US law.

That means almost every person in the Senate, regardless of party thinks that:

Don't care what they think. These are the same people who thought that Saddam had WMD.

1) Russia tried to fuck with the US elections
2) Trump wants to reverse Obama's sanctions
3) They don't want those sanctions reversed

That is very significant.

No, it's not.

 

[barbos]

Also, if I am not mistaken they put Iran into that bill, and we all know that republicans have a hard-on on Iran.

Here is one other issue. This is an actual piece of evidence that Trump was in discussions with the Russians over the sanctions. This was one of the first things they tried to get away with once in office, however, Senators Cardin and Graham interceded.

The pro-Russia posters here keep asking for evidence, and yet with this big piece of the puzzle, they just yawn. The Republicans fear Trump is just going to give the Russians back their spy HQ's, for absolutely nothing (well for the US) in return. This falls under the very suspicious column.

So you admit you have no evidence, just fear