RussiaGate

[Elixir]

So you admit you have no evidence, just fear

Barbos inspects the evidence:

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

This isn't a confirmation bias fallacy because it isn't in the Republicans best interests to tip its hand that it thinks Trump is allied with Russia over the United States. The US Senate in near unanimity voted to make Obama's sanctions on Russia US law.

That means almost every person in the Senate, regardless of party thinks that:

Don't care what they think. These are the same people who thought that Saddam had WMD.

1) Russia tried to fuck with the US elections
2) Trump wants to reverse Obama's sanctions
3) They don't want those sanctions reversed

That is very significant.

No, it's not.

Yes it is, for the very simple reason that the Republicans have become so bitterly partisan, they rarely ever do anything with the Democrats. When there is such unity that means either the legislation is symbolic (naming a monument) or critical (keeping the President from fucking over the US).

- - - Updated - - -

Here is one other issue. This is an actual piece of evidence that Trump was in discussions with the Russians over the sanctions. This was one of the first things they tried to get away with once in office, however, Senators Cardin and Graham interceded.

The pro-Russia posters here keep asking for evidence, and yet with this big piece of the puzzle, they just yawn. The Republicans fear Trump is just going to give the Russians back their spy HQ's, for absolutely nothing (well for the US) in return. This falls under the very suspicious column.

So you admit you have no evidence, just fear

Wow, that was weak of you.

 

[Deepak]

Russia has a history of interference as well, and has had a head start of hundreds of years - by your own rubric your argument is self-effacing

Isn't WW a Brit? Does he forget his own country's illustrious history of imperialism and oppression? Or don't they teach that in the UK?

I think you might have him confused with our resident master of geometric logic and keeper of strawberries

 

[barbos]

Don't care what they think. These are the same people who thought that Saddam had WMD.

1) Russia tried to fuck with the US elections
2) Trump wants to reverse Obama's sanctions
3) They don't want those sanctions reversed

That is very significant.

No, it's not.

Yes it is, for the very simple reason that the Republicans have become so bitterly partisan, they rarely ever do anything with the Democrats. When there is such unity that means either the legislation is symbolic (naming a monument) or critical (keeping the President from fucking over the US).

- - - Updated - - -

Here is one other issue. This is an actual piece of evidence that Trump was in discussions with the Russians over the sanctions. This was one of the first things they tried to get away with once in office, however, Senators Cardin and Graham interceded.

The pro-Russia posters here keep asking for evidence, and yet with this big piece of the puzzle, they just yawn. The Republicans fear Trump is just going to give the Russians back their spy HQ's, for absolutely nothing (well for the US) in return. This falls under the very suspicious column.

So you admit you have no evidence, just fear

Wow, that was weak of you.

You are welcome.

 

[Elixir]

You are welcome.

So are you!

 

[Underseer]

To summarize[ent]hellip[/ent]

Senator: So was Trump being personally investigated back then?
Comey: No.
Senator: Is he being investigated now?
Comey: I won't answer that question now, but I will answer it in a closed session.
Conservatives: Vindication! This proves that Trump didn't commit treason and he didn't obstruct justice! He is innocent! This is all a witch hunt! Those libtards are...
Special counsel: He's under investigation.
Conservatives: Hillary Clinton! Let's talk about Hillary Clinton instead! Sandy Hook was staged with crisis actors! Pizza-gate! Email server!!!!

 

[braces_for_impact]

Ya know, with everything stacked against them, it's a wonder these poor Republicans can win office of dog catcher. The intelligence services are in are it, as are the "deep state", democrats, the entire judiciary branch, the media, RINO's, other countries, and probably the illuminati lizard men from the lower 5th dimension.

 

[whichphilosophy]

Ya know, with everything stacked against them, it's a wonder these poor Republicans can win office of dog catcher. The intelligence services are in are it, as are the "deep state", democrats, the entire judiciary branch, the media, RINO's, other countries, and probably the illuminati lizard men from the lower 5th dimension.

In the light of day, apart from an illusion arising out of press sensationalism there is nothing really stacked against anyone, hence the Chinese expression, 'Paper Tiger'

This is really about letting the butt hurt manifest into continuing politics.

 

[Underseer]

Ya know, with everything stacked against them, it's a wonder these poor Republicans can win office of dog catcher. The intelligence services are in are it, as are the "deep state", democrats, the entire judiciary branch, the media, RINO's, other countries, and probably the illuminati lizard men from the lower 5th dimension.

In the light of day, apart from an illusion arising out of press sensationalism there is nothing really stacked against anyone, hence the Chinese expression, 'Paper Tiger'

This is really about letting the butt hurt manifest into continuing politics.

View attachment 11508

Yeah, those liberals just just as bad because they complain about innocent black people being randomly murdered in the streets, as if anyone gives a fuck about whether or not some stupid minority person lives or dies. In fact they're even bigger snowflakes than the conservatives. At may Trump's complaints about being viciously attacked by the media every day are true! [/sarcasm]

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

In the light of day, apart from an illusion arising out of press sensationalism there is nothing really stacked against anyone, hence the Chinese expression, 'Paper Tiger'

This is really about letting the butt hurt manifest into continuing politics.

Yeah, those liberals just just as bad because they complain about innocent black people being randomly murdered in the streets, as if anyone gives a fuck about whether or not some stupid minority person lives or dies. In fact they're even bigger snowflakes than the conservatives. At may Trump's complaints about being viciously attacked by the media every day are true! [/sarcasm]

whichphilosophy clearly doesn't understand the point about how the right-wing claims so many things are against them and then turns their conspiracy theories back on to the liberals. Such unbelievably clueless behavior on wp's part!

 

[whichphilosophy]

Yeah, those liberals just just as bad because they complain about innocent black people being randomly murdered in the streets, as if anyone gives a fuck about whether or not some stupid minority person lives or dies. In fact they're even bigger snowflakes than the conservatives. At may Trump's complaints about being viciously attacked by the media every day are true! [/sarcasm]

whichphilosophy clearly doesn't understand the point about how the right-wing claims so many things are against them and then turns their conspiracy theories back on to the liberals. Such unbelievably clueless behavior on wp's part!

Not just Afro-Americans are murdered in US streets. In Chicago alone 762 murders in Chicago alone. They are all races. Different races also kill different races as well as their own.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/02/us/chicago-murder-rate-2016-visual-guide/index.html

We should really be saying 'ALL LIVES MATTER' but that is politically incorrect and just not good Marxism.

 

[blastula]

WP is still hurting because women were allowed to have marches.

 

[Keith&Co.]

Not just Afro-Americans are murdered in US streets.

Who the fuck says 'Afro-Americans' any more?

We should really be saying 'ALL LIVES MATTER' but that is politically incorrect and just not good Marxism.

Careful with your pronouns. YOU can say whatever you want. It does kinda miss the entire point of BLM, but you can still say it.

What that has to do with Marxism outside of your head, though, that's a poser. Is EVERYTHING you dislike inspired by the Marx brothers?

 

[Elixir]

What that has to do with Marxism outside of your head, though, that's a poser. Is EVERYTHING you dislike inspired by the Marx brothers?

Groucho was such an asshole!
Here's something to give WP nightmares - THEY'RE UNDER YOUR BED, DUDE!

 

[whichphilosophy]

WP is still hurting because women were allowed to have marches.

Women have for a long time been allowed to have marches. Men also march and that is all part of a democracy, even if the marches are protesting against a democratic election process.

- - - Updated - - -

Who the fuck says 'Afro-Americans' any more?

We should really be saying 'ALL LIVES MATTER' but that is politically incorrect and just not good Marxism.

Careful with your pronouns. YOU can say whatever you want. It does kinda miss the entire point of BLM, but you can still say it.

What that has to do with Marxism outside of your head, though, that's a poser. Is EVERYTHING you dislike inspired by the Marx brothers?

Afro-American was once a polite term to exclude saying colour. Maybe this is changed back again.

Regards,
Capt. Obvious.

 

[whichphilosophy]

What that has to do with Marxism outside of your head, though, that's a poser. Is EVERYTHING you dislike inspired by the Marx brothers?

Groucho was such an asshole!
Here's something to give WP nightmares - THEY'RE UNDER YOUR BED, DUDE!

W-o-o-o-o-ah.
Actually they're in the bed.

The SWP used have members with dual Labour party membership, even though it was deemed more left than the British Communist Party.

Actually Corbyn is less undesirable than May.

 

[Keith&Co.]

Afro-American was once a polite term to exclude saying colour.

Um, yes, 'once.' Not now. I'm quite aware of the term.
That's why I did not ask, 'what the fuck do you mean by Afro-America?'
Rather, I asked 'Who the fuck says 'Afro-Americans' any more?'

Maybe this is changed back again.

Maybe?
Why would you think that?

More like Captain Make Shit Up.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Who the fuck says 'Afro-Americans' any more?

We should really be saying 'ALL LIVES MATTER' but that is politically incorrect and just not good Marxism.

Careful with your pronouns. YOU can say whatever you want. It does kinda miss the entire point of BLM, but you can still say it.

What that has to do with Marxism outside of your head, though, that's a poser. Is EVERYTHING you dislike inspired by the Marx brothers?

Looks like the Bot is on the fritz. Seems like they tuned it from pro-Russia to anti-liberal and it is getting out of whack.

 

[whichphilosophy]

Um, yes, 'once.' Not now. I'm quite aware of the term.
That's why I did not ask, 'what the fuck do you mean by Afro-America?'
Rather, I asked 'Who the fuck says 'Afro-Americans' any more?'

Maybe this is changed back again.

Maybe?
Why would you think that?

More like Captain Make Shit Up.

We can't keep up with the latest political-correctness fads in the USA. So what is the current word because I didn't find anything to suggest that this word has gone out of use or what it is replaced with.

If you have an up to date meaning in a dictionary this will be useful. There is an entry in Dictionary.com which says it is largely replaced by African-American.

So I shall wait for your reply.

 

[Elixir]

We can't keep up with the latest political-correctness fads in the USA

Who is "we"?
YOU can't even keep your shit straight on this little forum

So what is the current word because I didn't find anything to suggest that this word has gone out of use or what it is replaced with.

Is this forum somehow obligated to serve you up the remedial education you so sorely need?

So I shall wait for your reply.

Silently?
Praise Xenu !