We all get that you did not 'get' the meme and were horrifically offended by it.
I'm not offended by it. I think it's ridiculous. I called it out for being an obvious concoction (with which an increasing number of people seem to agree), and I called out how stupid the plain meaning of it was. For this, I was accused of being a Nazi and an autist.
But probably a lot of us, myself included, have run across that meme several times in various social media settings. I'll wager that we all of us understood immediately that it was in response to attempts to ban certain books and to restrict history lessons to those that will not give offense to white children('s parents.
I have no doubt that in your insular leftist circle, you've come across the meme more than once. That is part of the point. The meme is an obvious feelgood concoction of an event that never happened, and even the vile plain meaning of its words seem to be no barrier to its ability to appeal to a certain class of people. The words quoted in the meme are plainly ridiculous, yet Jarhyn described its wisdom as if it were transcendent.
You didn't get it the same way that we did, even though I tend to agree with you that the meme was a bit off the mark and I'm not certain I'd credit a child with coming up with those words. It's not impossible but it's also not certainly absolutely true, either.
I believe a child coached by a parent whose Twitter name was 'happyqueer' probably could have said something like it, but the point is the fakeness. It's fake even if the words are a good paraphrase of the coached Childlike Empress's response. It's such an obvious and distasteful virtue signal.
But beyond that, even the True Meaning (divined here by the Prophetess Rhea, though any in the Order of the Seers might have done it) is false and distasteful. People might want to 'ban' books (though the choice of a school library to carry or not carry certain material does not mean 'banned') that show the atrocities in order to spare feelings of distress, not because they want the atrocities to happen again.
I think all of us would do well to remember that posts on forums such as this often come across as being far more harsh than perhaps the author intended. There are at least two bad effects from this: the outrage is amped up unnecessarily and people quit hearing each other and instead want to trump the other person. And if someone always responds to everything with which they disagree with outrage, it becomes more difficult to take that person very seriously. Any good point they might have made tends to be diminished. Outrage needs to be used sparingly if it is to do anything other than to inflame passions. I think there's quite enough of that in the world these days. At least in terms of political passions for BEING RIGHT which a lot of people confuse with being loudest or having the last word.
It seems to me that some people on this board oppose the absolute mildest criticism of any kind, like pointing out fakeness, if the criticism is somehow perceived to be coming from the wrong person or is aimed at the wrong person or idea.
Here's my summary: that meme was concocted by a leftist virtue-signaller, was 'liked' and 'shared' by people of similar faith, and has every element of fakeness it would be possible to squeeze into such a construct. Now, all of that I wouldn't mind, but the fawning response to the 'words of wisdom' is really unpleasant to behold, because the plain meaning of the words are ridiculous, and the True Meaning is slightly less distasteful and not as obviously wicked, but still false.