• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

So another "chemical" attack in Syria?

 
 
 
Which makes you wonder exactly what it is that the lamestream media are hiding. Who paid them off to not talk about it?

If your first answer is "The Jews", you're right.
 
Elixir said:
whichphilosophy said:
However, there isn't actual evidence that he did, nor is there a concrete motive.
Click to expand...

You keep conflating the existence of evidence with "what whichphilosophy is aware of".
Click to expand...

I'm saying there is no feasible evidence. If there is let's see it. As the lawyers say during disclosure, 'You show me your's and I'll show you mine.'
 
Jeremy Scahill went full nuclear on CNN. Funny stuff. The breakdown by Jimmy Dore neglected to mention partial Saudi ownership of both CNN and Fox News.

 
repoman said:
Mossad scumbag, no loyalty to the US concerning Al Qaeda.



video blocked in Germany, Poland and more. What reason?

https://polsy.org.uk/stuff/ytrestrict.cgi?ytid=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com% 2Fwatch%3Fv%3DUu1_SyXVG2M
Click to expand...

But he does not claim that Israel is in alliance with Al-Qaeda. He counts Al-Qaeda as an enemy, but says that for humanitarian reasons, it's okay for Israel to treat wounded fighters, but it would not be okay to threat Hezbollah fighters. He doesn't make much sense explaining the distinction, but it's all about different levels of enmity, not about an alliance.
 
Angra Mainyu said:
repoman said:
Mossad scumbag, no loyalty to the US concerning Al Qaeda.



video blocked in Germany, Poland and more. What reason?

https://polsy.org.uk/stuff/ytrestrict.cgi?ytid=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com% 2Fwatch%3Fv%3DUu1_SyXVG2M
Click to expand...

But he does not claim that Israel is in alliance with Al-Qaeda. He counts Al-Qaeda as an enemy, but says that for humanitarian reasons, it's okay for Israel to treat wounded fighters, but it would not be okay to threat Hezbollah fighters. He doesn't make much sense explaining the distinction, but it's all about different levels of enmity, not about an alliance.
Click to expand...


Treating ISIS people doesn't endanger the doctors. Treating Hezbollah people would be dangerous.
 
Loren Pechtel said:
Angra Mainyu said:
But he does not claim that Israel is in alliance with Al-Qaeda. He counts Al-Qaeda as an enemy, but says that for humanitarian reasons, it's okay for Israel to treat wounded fighters, but it would not be okay to threat Hezbollah fighters. He doesn't make much sense explaining the distinction, but it's all about different levels of enmity, not about an alliance.
Click to expand...

Treating ISIS people doesn't endanger the doctors. Treating Hezbollah people would be dangerous.
Click to expand...

He says with no support or explanation as to why that would be the case.
 
Loren Pechtel said:
KeepTalking said:
He says with no support or explanation as to why that would be the case.
Click to expand...

It's not likely an ISIS fighter will try a suicide attack in an Israeli hospital.
Click to expand...

Presumably, any suicide vest a terrorist (regardless of their affiliation) might be wearing would have been removed before their arrival at the hospital. Care to try again?
 
Loren Pechtel said:
KeepTalking said:
He says with no support or explanation as to why that would be the case.
Click to expand...

It's not likely an ISIS fighter will try a suicide attack in an Israeli hospital.
Click to expand...
It's not likely that a Hezbollah fighter would try a suicide attack either.

This whole tangent is silly though, I'm sure that when Israel captured Hezbollah fighters in 2006 war, they were treated just as well as any other prisoners, including medical care if needed.
 
KeepTalking said:
Loren Pechtel said:
It's not likely an ISIS fighter will try a suicide attack in an Israeli hospital.
Click to expand...

Presumably, any suicide vest a terrorist (regardless of their affiliation) might be wearing would have been removed before their arrival at the hospital. Care to try again?
Click to expand...

You think there isn't anything dangerous in an emergency room???

Not to mention the possibility of internal explosives.

Israel is very careful about how they accept the surrender of Hamas and Hezbollah fighters, up to and including killing those who won't strip.
 
Loren Pechtel said:
KeepTalking said:
Presumably, any suicide vest a terrorist (regardless of their affiliation) might be wearing would have been removed before their arrival at the hospital. Care to try again?
Click to expand...

You think there isn't anything dangerous in an emergency room???

Not to mention the possibility of internal explosives.

Israel is very careful about how they accept the surrender of Hamas and Hezbollah fighters, up to and including killing those who won't strip.
Click to expand...

Or when they're just laying wounded in the street.
[YOUTUBE]https://youtu.be/P-Bl9zAM5A4[/YOUTUBE]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom