• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

So, besides voting (it's too late), What can we do?

The average life expectancy in the United States in 2020 was 77.3 years, which was the lowest it had been since 2003!
And you don't suspect Covid for that?

In 1982 U.S. life expectancy was only about ½ year less than the average developed democracy. By 2019 the gap had increased to almost 4 years! (IIUC this was largely due to opioid abuse in the U.S.) By 2021 the gap had soared to 5½ years! The average fell by 1 year, but the U.S. plunged by 2½ years ... over a mere 2 year period! Spoiler alert: Trump mismanaged Covid response.
 
Spoiler alert: Trump mismanaged Covid response.
He's getting his revenge now. Why do you think the CDC,NIH and WHO were his first targets?
 
Why do you think the CDC,NIH and WHO were his first targets?
The idiot tries to destroy everything and everyone that makes him look stupid. Obviously he is going to have to destroy the universe, because it reveals his stupidity at every turn.
I wouldn't assign any "strategy" to Trump.
He doesn't do chess.
One of his aides from the first term pointed this out, he said that Trump just eats all the pieces-there is no strategy.
He wants one thing, and one thing only: adulation.
 
There seems to be a tacit assumption in this thread that the value of experience and expertise of senior workers has less value than the vim and vigor of the less experienced younger replacements.
If you are referring to my posts you may be reading in too far.

I believe that each organization should determine for itself who might be appropriately let go based on their own knowledge of the efficiencies and workloads in their organization. Clearly experienced experts are greatly valued as are the newly hired and newly promoted.

Nobody should get the axe without a careful analysis of where cuts should be made (assuming cuts must be made).

Unfortunately, that’s not what is happening.
 
We should be anticipating our prospect of receiving our $5000 dodge check which will be real revenue (not just printed currency) we can spend without inflating the rest of our currency. https://www.northjersey.com/story/n...25-stimulus-refund-check-meaning/79290330007/

And if enough of us have confidence this money is not just printed we might actually spend it (versus investing in bitcoin) on US manufactured products that may actually help our own GNP and standard of living to rise.

I'm curious where @RVonse came up with his "real revenue" meme. Did he pick this up at OAN or Truth Social? Or is this his own original meme derived from RVonse's expertise in monetary theory?

I'll guess that what RVonse means by "real" money "not just printed" is that the $5000 is savings from laying off medical researchers*, FDA inspectors, DoEnergy and DoEducation employees, etc. rather than filthy "fake" money gained by taxing the rich....

@RVonse -- I am still interested in understanding the distinction between "real" money and "fake" money. This does not appear to be a term in any of the Chicago, Alabama or neo-Marxist schools of economics. Do you have a pre-print explaining the concept?

Meanwhile can you explicate with examples? Did the Biden stimulus provide real money or fake money? One certainty is that the Federal debt will balloon to record-setting levels by the end of 2025; will the money owed be real or fake?

Here is a Rachel Maddow video explaining that most of the savings claimed by Musk's DOGE was definitely fake.. Do watch this video please! I'm sure you doubt that a lesbian libtard has anything to teach you, but you are wrong about that. And this material will be on the test.
 
We should be anticipating our prospect of receiving our $5000 dodge check which will be real revenue (not just printed currency) we can spend without inflating the rest of our currency. https://www.northjersey.com/story/n...25-stimulus-refund-check-meaning/79290330007/

And if enough of us have confidence this money is not just printed we might actually spend it (versus investing in bitcoin) on US manufactured products that may actually help our own GNP and standard of living to rise.

I'm curious where @RVonse came up with his "real revenue" meme. Did he pick this up at OAN or Truth Social? Or is this his own original meme derived from RVonse's expertise in monetary theory?

I'll guess that what RVonse means by "real" money "not just printed" is that the $5000 is savings from laying off medical researchers*, FDA inspectors, DoEnergy and DoEducation employees, etc. rather than filthy "fake" money gained by taxing the rich....

@RVonse -- I am still interested in understanding the distinction between "real" money and "fake" money. This does not appear to be a term in any of the Chicago, Alabama or neo-Marxist schools of economics. Do you have a pre-print explaining the concept?

Meanwhile can you explicate with examples? Did the Biden stimulus provide real money or fake money? One certainty is that the Federal debt will balloon to record-setting levels by the end of 2025; will the money owed be real or fake?

Here is a Rachel Maddow video explaining that most of the savings claimed by Musk's DOGE was definitely fake.. Do watch this video please! I'm sure you doubt that a lesbian libtard has anything to teach you, but you are wrong about that. And this material will be on the test.
I'm actually glad you are pointing out the other side that I do not normally see. None of us can get anywhere unless there is agreement about what is real and what were just mistakes. But if anyone can learn quickly from past mistakes I believe Musk has the intelligence though.

As for my definition of fake money. Fake money is counterfeit currency made in exact imitation of something valuable or important with the intention to deceive or defraud. And that is what our fed does during "monetary easing". The rest of us have to work or produce goods to earn the same paper money the fed simply prints. Only the fed gets to do this without going to jail and the fed isn't even technically our government. Since our treasury borrows more than we can pay back, the fed pretty much has to keep printing money simply to remain solvent at this point. It is also why the fed has said we will never see inflation less than 2% ever again. But that 2% is an inflation tax on the middle class in addition to the rest of our taxes we pay.

But money saved by DOGE is REAL money. Its real because no one had to print more currency in circulation. Those saved dollars were already existing dollars and can be transferred from the fraud and waste account to something more useful (such as a $5000 check) account. If you transfer $5000 from a fired employee salary to refund taxpayers, that will NOT cause inflation. Or at least no more inflation than the fed has already caused.
 
Last edited:
We should be anticipating our prospect of receiving our $5000 dodge check which will be real revenue (not just printed currency) we can spend without inflating the rest of our currency. https://www.northjersey.com/story/n...25-stimulus-refund-check-meaning/79290330007/

And if enough of us have confidence this money is not just printed we might actually spend it (versus investing in bitcoin) on US manufactured products that may actually help our own GNP and standard of living to rise.

I'm curious where @RVonse came up with his "real revenue" meme. Did he pick this up at OAN or Truth Social? Or is this his own original meme derived from RVonse's expertise in monetary theory?

I'll guess that what RVonse means by "real" money "not just printed" is that the $5000 is savings from laying off medical researchers*, FDA inspectors, DoEnergy and DoEducation employees, etc. rather than filthy "fake" money gained by taxing the rich....

@RVonse -- I am still interested in understanding the distinction between "real" money and "fake" money. This does not appear to be a term in any of the Chicago, Alabama or neo-Marxist schools of economics. Do you have a pre-print explaining the concept?

Meanwhile can you explicate with examples? Did the Biden stimulus provide real money or fake money? One certainty is that the Federal debt will balloon to record-setting levels by the end of 2025; will the money owed be real or fake?

Here is a Rachel Maddow video explaining that most of the savings claimed by Musk's DOGE was definitely fake.. Do watch this video please! I'm sure you doubt that a lesbian libtard has anything to teach you, but you are wrong about that. And this material will be on the test.
I'm actually glad you are pointing out the other side that I do not normally see.

So DID you actually watch that YouTube? Yes or no.

None of us can get anywhere unless there is agreement about what is real and what were just mistakes. But if anyone can learn quickly from past mistakes I believe Musk has the intelligence though.

As for my definition of fake money. Fake money is counterfeit currency made in exact imitation of something valuable or important with the intention to deceive or defraud.

Yeah, we knew what you meant with your inane concept of "fake money." The rhetoric question was to prod you into coming to your senses. Instead you double down. "counterfeit ... to deceit or defraud." Wow.

Let me try to hammer the obvious into your head. U.S. money is completely FUNGIBLE. Nobody inspects the date on your Benjamin to guess whether it is "real" Trump money or "fake" Biden money. I'll guess that you already know this much.

Financial actions can increase or contract the money supply. At the end of the day, one need simply look at some financial numbers to measure the money supply. You know very little about that (please bump one of the existing threads if you have sincere interest in learning) but for your purpose here the Totals of U.S. Debt are enough to get you started. ... So ...
A year or two from now do you think the federal debt will have grown or shrunk? Spoiler alert: Trump plans to restore a big tax cut -- the Debt WILL grow. Federal money is spent on TRANSFERS: Transfers to SocSec recipients, Transfers to hungry school-children, Transfers (interest payments) to holders of U.S. debt. The "savings" from mass lay-offs pale before these transfers, and before the tax-cuts (and the alleged "$5K per household") that Trump will inflict. Get it? Same-same.

Yet you insist on calling Biden's stimulus "counterfeit money", and Trump's vote-buying "real money."

Spend a couple of minutes trying to think rationally and learn what a fool you sound like.*
And that is what our fed does during "monetary easing". The rest of us have to work or produce goods

... or services. FDA and USDA inspectors perform useful services but they've been laid off. Instead Trump proposes $5000 per household for doing nothing. Capische? In other words, the truth about laying off useful employees to enrich Trump's friends and bribe voters is exactly the OPPOSITE of what you claim.
to earn the same paper money the fed simply prints. Only the fed gets to do this without going to jail and the fed isn't even technically our government.

This is so confused! For starters, private banks create money. If "the fed isn't even technically our government" it's because its books operate like those of a private bank.

Start (or bump) another thread if you need to understand Quantitative Easing better; but for now just know that one of the strongest initial advocates of QE was the right-wing economist Milton Friedman.
Since our treasury borrows more than we can pay back, the fed pretty much has to keep printing money simply to remain solvent at this point. It is also why the fed has said we will never see inflation less than 2% ever again. But that 2% is an inflation tax on the middle class in addition to the rest of our taxes we pay.

But money saved by DOGE is REAL money. Its real because no one had to print more currency in circulation. Those saved dollars were already existing dollars and can be transferred from the fraud and waste account to something more useful (such as a $5000 check) account. If you transfer $5000 from a fired employee salary to refund taxpayers, that will NOT cause inflation. Or at least no more inflation than the fed has already caused.

As I said, money is FUNGIBLE. The Debt will grow or shrink. Let us know what you guess the debt will be in January 2026. 2027? 2028?

* - Above I mentioned that your views on economics and money creation were foolish and incompetent. I use strong language hoping it wakes you up. It is not difficult to learn the basics.

In fact we should ADMIRE you. Recently I posted an informative opinion about MAGA supporters. It addressed the mystery: WHY do MAGA fans swallow so much obvious bullshit? Answer: They KNOW it's bullshit. But remembering interactions from 5th grade when their bully out-ranted a different bully, they are happy to see their leader bullshit! It is futile to argue with this ilk of MAGA fans; when the lies they've swallowed are pointed out, they just laugh and taunt the rational thinker by pretending that they don't know that the lies are lies.

But YOU do seem to believe many of the lies of Trumpism. Although disappointing, and unfortunate for you, it suggests there may be hope for you. Ask the right questions and challenge your own thinking.

For starters, consider $X that Biden spent on programs to feed hungry children, and the same $X that Trump will spend on tax cuts for the rich. Do you REALLY think that the different distributions of that $X makes Biden's money counterfeit" and Trump's money "real"?
 
We should be anticipating our prospect of receiving our $5000 dodge check which will be real revenue (not just printed currency) we can spend without inflating the rest of our currency. https://www.northjersey.com/story/n...25-stimulus-refund-check-meaning/79290330007/

And if enough of us have confidence this money is not just printed we might actually spend it (versus investing in bitcoin) on US manufactured products that may actually help our own GNP and standard of living to rise.

I'm curious where @RVonse came up with his "real revenue" meme. Did he pick this up at OAN or Truth Social? Or is this his own original meme derived from RVonse's expertise in monetary theory?

I'll guess that what RVonse means by "real" money "not just printed" is that the $5000 is savings from laying off medical researchers*, FDA inspectors, DoEnergy and DoEducation employees, etc. rather than filthy "fake" money gained by taxing the rich....

@RVonse -- I am still interested in understanding the distinction between "real" money and "fake" money. This does not appear to be a term in any of the Chicago, Alabama or neo-Marxist schools of economics. Do you have a pre-print explaining the concept?

Meanwhile can you explicate with examples? Did the Biden stimulus provide real money or fake money? One certainty is that the Federal debt will balloon to record-setting levels by the end of 2025; will the money owed be real or fake?

Here is a Rachel Maddow video explaining that most of the savings claimed by Musk's DOGE was definitely fake.. Do watch this video please! I'm sure you doubt that a lesbian libtard has anything to teach you, but you are wrong about that. And this material will be on the test.
I'm actually glad you are pointing out the other side that I do not normally see.

So DID you actually watch that YouTube? Yes or no.

I watched the entirety of your youtube link. Which is much much more than you guys would ever tolerate ideology wise from myself.

I suspect the reason I can enjoy watching Rachel is because (unlike you guys) I'm not hard hard left or right ideologically. I can view her message without going completely insane because I can disagree with the message but still see where she is coming from.
None of us can get anywhere unless there is agreement about what is real and what were just mistakes. But if anyone can learn quickly from past mistakes I believe Musk has the intelligence though.
As for my definition of fake money. Fake money is counterfeit currency made in exact imitation of something valuable or important with the intention to deceive or defraud.

Yeah, we knew what you meant with your inane concept of "fake money." The rhetoric question was to prod you into coming to your senses. Instead you double down. "counterfeit ... to deceit or defraud." Wow.

Let me try to hammer the obvious into your head. U.S. money is completely FUNGIBLE. Nobody inspects the date on your Benjamin to guess whether it is "real" Trump money or "fake" Biden money. I'll guess that you already know this much.

Financial actions can increase or contract the money supply. At the end of the day, one need simply look at some financial numbers to measure the money supply. You know very little about that (please bump one of the existing threads if you have sincere interest in learning) but for your purpose here the Totals of U.S. Debt are enough to get you started. ... So ...
A year or two from now do you think the federal debt will have grown or shrunk? Spoiler alert: Trump plans to restore a big tax cut -- the Debt WILL grow. Federal money is spent on TRANSFERS: Transfers to SocSec recipients, Transfers to hungry school-children, Transfers (interest payments) to holders of U.S. debt. The "savings" from mass lay-offs pale before these transfers, and before the tax-cuts (and the alleged "$5K per household") that Trump will inflict. Get it? Same-same.

Yet you insist on calling Biden's stimulus "counterfeit money", and Trump's vote-buying "real money."

Spend a couple of minutes trying to think rationally and learn what a fool you sound like.*
Unless money is earned in exchange for services or goods that we care about, it is has to inflate. Increasing the supply of dollars without making any more goods is inflation. Surely we can agree that far.

You can then try to then confuse us by saying the good money mixed with bad money still gives a shit deficit anyway. But most of us still realize more good money in the mix is better than making more bad money in the mix.

You can also try to confuse us by saying government employees earn good money by providing services we care about. And you almost have a valid point....until you consider the following:
1) If these employees were providing services we really cared about, the private market would already be providing these services
2) The money these employees are paid is the same money that private citizens could and would have spent on goods AND services that they desired in the first place.

I will admit this far though. That a government employee performing services is better for the taxpayer than the fed printing money.

 

As I said, money is FUNGIBLE. The Debt will grow or shrink. Let us know what you guess the debt will be in January 2026. 2027? 2028?
Trump is going for a balanced budget before the end of his term. So you can keep this post and refer back to see if that goal was achieved.

Personally, I think a balanced budget within 3-4 years is unreal but some of things both Trump and Musk have done have been unreal....so who knows? And if they do fail, I would be satisfied that a valid attempt was made and we went into the darkness fighting.

What I do know for sure is that doing nothing continuing the same path will ensure the ruin of our nation. But I will admit this advantage of being painless until our decline is unstoppable.
 
Last edited:

You can also try to confuse us by saying government employees earn good money by providing services we care about. And you almost have a valid point....until you consider the following:
1) If these employees were providing services we really cared about, the private market would already be providing these services
How would a private market effectively provide national defense or police services or clean air? In each of those cases, it is not possible to effectively exclude those who do not pay.

How would a private market effectively regulate the release of noxious gases or liquids into the environment?

How would a private market effectively engage in basic research since the benefits of the results cannot effectively monetized?

How would a private market engage in income redistribution?

Markets are good for achieving certain goals, but not every sort of goal.



2) The money these employees are paid is the same money that private citizens could and would have spent on goods AND services that they desired in the first place.
In a civilized society that they have agreed to live in, why should their desires necessarily take precedence over democratic society's expressed goals?


 
The problem here is conflating how much we care about the goods and services, and how much it costs us to actually provide them.

There are many things people care about very much. You can, if you have the sole supply of (everything needed to live), you can put everyone else over a barrel and enslave all of humanity with your disgusting leverage no matter how much effort it does (or doesn't) cost to do this.

This is what happens with free market solutions: the playing field will shrink and shrink and shrink until everyone is over the barrel from someone who uses that to continue leveraging power.

The reason we make these things public or provide them through the government is because MOST people cherish these things, but they would choose DEATH over "living over the barrel".

So, they use that threat of death specifically against those who would attempt to monopolize that which we need to live, such that they cannot.

I will stand, armed, between the means to monopolize the means to survive and those who would monopolize them.
 
The rest of the world is going to need to step up and start enacting some sort of economic sanctions package against the US. Canada and Mexico need to find new supply chains and cut out the US as much as possible. Also, they need to immediately start a nuclear weapons program, as do the rest of the nations in Europe. Perhaps form a new NATO alliance ex-US. If Trump tries to stop any of these nuclear weapons programs they'll need to send in troops to defend it. It will take some time but it needs to happen sooner rather than later.

Barring that I see the last gasps of liberal democracy in the world flaming out and a world where russia controls a large chunk of Europe, China controls Asia, and the US controls north and south america, and Iran and Saudi Arabia vie for influence over the middle east. Puppet regimes in place everywhere.
 
Last edited:
The US is not the world's sole superpower and world police because it wants to be everyone's daddy and make the world a magical place full of democracy and free markets. The US dominates the world because it has made them richer than anyone has ever been.

The US is a maritime empire based on trade. It trades with the entire globe and enforces a favourable global status quo through layers of military and economic pacts, and projects both hard and soft power through military strength, foreign aid, and cultural exports. The US profits because a lot of other countries profit, and the US makes it costly to fuck with the system.

Trump's "America First" doctrine will collapse the US empire, because Trump thinks he can squeeze more money of it while investing less.

The world can't do anything to stop this. The US has to be a voluntary participant in its own empire. Hitting the US with a stick won't help. All the world can do is adapt. Hopefully we can do that by establishing new agreements where other countries agree to take over the responsibility of making sure everyone plays nice and gets paid.
 
Why do you think the CDC,NIH and WHO were his first targets?
The idiot tries to destroy everything and everyone that makes him look stupid. Obviously he is going to have to destroy the universe, because it reveals his stupidity at every turn.
I wouldn't assign any "strategy" to Trump.
He doesn't do chess.
One of his aides from the first term pointed this out, he said that Trump just eats all the pieces-there is no strategy.
He wants one thing, and one thing only: adulation.
I don't see how any of that contradicts the notion that he wants to destroy everyone who makes him look stupid. It's entirely in line with him having a massive ego and desiring adulation. It's a consequence of his desire for adulation. That's how narcissists operate.
 
Back
Top Bottom