Contrary to all the bad Yankee press, Socialism has succeeded spectacularly in bringing abundance to Venezuela.
¡Viva la Revolución!
¡Viva la Revolución!
Future fate for Mr. and Mrs. Maduro?
View attachment 17629
Btw, what kind of gay Brazilian steakhouse is that? Whose picture is on that bib?
Contrary to all the bad Yankee press, Socialism has succeeded spectacularly in bringing abundance to Venezuela.
¡Viva la Revolución!
Future fate for Mr. and Mrs. Maduro?
View attachment 17629
Btw, what kind of gay Brazilian steakhouse is that? Whose picture is on that bib?Contrary to all the bad Yankee press, Socialism has succeeded spectacularly in bringing abundance to Venezuela.
¡Viva la Revolución!
"Quick, people are criticizing my support of racism and the appointment of an avowed racist, perjurer to the highest court, let's post a thread about not-even-Marxism failing after they tried to base their economy on a single export"
"Quick, people are criticizing my support of racism and the appointment of an avowed racist, perjurer to the highest court, let's post a thread about not-even-Marxism failing after they tried to base their economy on a single export"
Wow. A Maduro defender. Didn't think that possible.
"Quick, people are criticizing my support of racism and the appointment of an avowed racist, perjurer to the highest court, let's post a thread about not-even-Marxism failing after they tried to base their economy on a single export"
Wow. A Maduro defender. Didn't think that possible.
My problem with these recurring let's bash Venezuela's socialism threads is that there is nothing in them except the anticipation that we should viscerally react to the evil in socialism without any analysis of the problems that plague Venezuela, much less even a hint at a solution.
I suppose that we are to assume that the solution to socialism is capitalism. But capitalism also failed in Venezuela, because it was an oligarchy with a very few becoming extremely wealthy while leaving a large part of the population in poverty. Chavez was elected as a reaction to the oligarchy and its far-right brand of government helped in no small part by the revelation that the US was interfering in the election in support of the oligarchy.
What should they do to avoid swinging between the two extremes?
"Quick, people are criticizing my support of racism and the appointment of an avowed racist, perjurer to the highest court, let's post a thread about not-even-Marxism failing after they tried to base their economy on a single export"
Wow. A Maduro defender. Didn't think that possible.
I read Jarhyn's post as not a defense of Maduro but an observation that we see these bash Venezuela's socialism threads when a particular segment of our discussion board tires of defending the indefensible.
For my part, the Supreme Court nomination debate is a purely partisan one without any hint of rationally on either side, so there isn't much that I can add to it. So I am staying away from it.
My problem with these recurring let's bash Venezuela's socialism threads is that there is nothing in them except the anticipation that we should viscerally react to the evil in socialism without any analysis of the problems that plague Venezuela, much less even a hint at a solution.
I suppose that we are to assume that the solution to socialism is capitalism. But capitalism also failed in Venezuela, because it was an oligarchy with a very few becoming extremely wealthy while leaving a large part of the population in poverty. Chavez was elected as a reaction to the oligarchy and its far-right brand of government helped in no small part by the revelation that the US was interfering in the election in support of the oligarchy.
What should they do to avoid swinging between the two extremes?
Should Venezuela follow the example of the US and support the oligarchy by convincing a bare majority of the voters that oligarchy and its income inequality are good and that the poor are responsible for their poverty?
Is the solution to Venezuela's problems its own Fox News and support for the oligarchy from the US interfering in Venezuela's elections yet again?
Why did none of these Americans care about Venezuela when it was an apartheid capitalist state with millions of indigenous citizens oppressed?
Why was that not a failed state?
Why did none of these Americans care about Venezuela when it was an apartheid capitalist state with millions of indigenous citizens oppressed?
Why was that not a failed state?
How was it a failed state before?
Why did none of these Americans care about Venezuela when it was an apartheid capitalist state with millions of indigenous citizens oppressed?
Why was that not a failed state?
How was it a failed state before?
How is millions oppressed based on ethnicity not a failed state for them?
Why did none of these Americans care about Venezuela when it was an apartheid capitalist state with millions of indigenous citizens oppressed?
Why was that not a failed state?
How is millions oppressed based on ethnicity not a failed state for them?
Wat?
Why do you apologize for this?
![]()
Venezuela food shortage: One image that tells you about the crisis
The solution to Venezuela's problems is easy: stop fucking things up.
How is millions oppressed based on ethnicity not a failed state for them?
Wat?
Why do you apologize for this?
![]()
Venezuela food shortage: One image that tells you about the crisis
Who's apologizing?
But millions of Venezuelans went hungry before Chavez too.
It was a sick apartheid state.
Why are you defending it?
The solution to Venezuela's problems is easy: stop fucking things up.
Wow. You've just solved all of Venezuela's problems. Hopefully someone in Caracas is reading this and sees your undeniable wisdom. They'll then run to the Presidential Palace and somehow get a meeting with Maduro, and explain "you see, Mr. President, we need to stop fucking things up."
Then Maduro - as if struck by lightning - will suddenly realize "wow...we need to stop fucking things up."