Uh huh. There’s only one solution, and everyone agrees what it is;
Thank you, Mr. "But be sure to apply that to the muzzies".
Yup. I’m all about equality.Thank you, Mr. "But be sure to apply that to the muzzies".
Was this a response to you, Elixir? Or are you getting bent out of shape about my response to someone else and taking it personally?
Sure, sure, because the nations where islam is the dominant religion are bastions of freedom, democracy, and progress. Islam *is* the problem. In a much more blatantly obvious way than you seem to want to consider.
Who hates Christianity? Not me!
The USA is currently waging a religious war on Muslims, so therefore USA is pre-democratic (the latter is true of course regardless of its Islamaphobia.
Easy - the USA. Of course not as drastically as what you mention, but getting there, or it would be if massive resistance wasn't growing, that spikes the dominionists' plans.
It is . Read this wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamophobia_in_the_United_St
In the USA, Australia, NZ, and so on Islam is not a threat, but Christianity is, especially in USA.
It produced cultural and human tragedy, a lamentably common story all over the world for millennia. Those examples are just some of the latest and the greatest. One of the biggest historical drivers of such over the centuries IMO has been climate change. We blame the gods, and maybe rub the noses off the old ones when the real one(s) who didn’t cause the famine gains favor.
Behave yourself. Every other week a mohamedan is killing the kaffir in the UK alone.
In Nigeria Christians seem to be regularly massacred, driven away etc. by Islamists
In China, Uighurs are routinely massacred and enslaved. So what? That doesn’t make Xtians “better” than Chinese people.
Nobody claimed Xtians are "better" than Muslim people. That isn't what's in dispute. T!'s point appears to be that SI's limitation of the discussion to English-speaking former colonies is an arbitrary limitation, and when we look at the full picture his "Similar incidents against Christians have not occurred." claim is unsupportable.
“Islam is the problem” belies that assertion.
So is peanut butter.
Which ongoing American military adventure are you characterizing as "a religious war on Muslims"?
So, none. Is it the Australian press that paints you this absurd picture of America, or are you getting it from some internet echo chamber?
You had to go back six years for that. That averages out to nine people a year. In 2001, some Saudi Islamists in New York, USA, attacked the WTC, killing about 2400 Christians. That averages out to one hundred people a year.
Apology. You’re right. Separating religions from their adherents avoids the comparison.
Still applies.
You're the one who has opined that christianity is at least as big a risk as islam is. Whether you consider it against the core teachings of the religions or not, I think it's willfully blind to look at the state of islam-dominated countries versus christian-dominated countries and come to the conclusion that they're equally dangerous.
I don't disagree that any system of belief can be abused.
Pointing out that a specific religion, as currently practiced in huge amounts, currently involved in massive terrorist endeavors and involved in jihad backed by multiple theocracies is a problem seems to really bother you. I don't think christian people are better than muslim people as people. I do, however, think that chrisianity as currently practiced is less dangerous than islam as currently practiced as a religion.
That's one of the most blatantly dishonest post snips I've seen in a while.
Says the guy who routinely resorts to the text form of screaming at me, and who regularly mischaracterizes my views with lots of invective in order to pretend you have some moral high ground.
