• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

The case for invading the USA to effect regime change

This funny article has a few good points: https://www.macleans.ca/opinion/the-case-for-invading-america/

By the USA's own long held and often repeated doctrine, shouldn't we, the rest of the free world invade the USA and effect regime change?

That is funny (sick, but funny).
Problem of course, is that Individual-1 would sooner nuke New York City than let you - or anyone else - steal his gold toilets.
Other than that, I'd say bring it on - I even have room to put up a couple hundred of your troops!
 
This funny article has a few good points: https://www.macleans.ca/opinion/the-case-for-invading-america/

By the USA's own long held and often repeated doctrine, shouldn't we, the rest of the free world invade the USA and effect regime change?

That is funny (sick, but funny).
Problem of course, is that Individual-1 would sooner nuke New York City than let you - or anyone else - steal his gold toilets.
Other than that, I'd say bring it on - I even have room to put up a couple hundred of your troops!

Ah, so you're a traitor.
 
This funny article has a few good points: https://www.macleans.ca/opinion/the-case-for-invading-america/

By the USA's own long held and often repeated doctrine, shouldn't we, the rest of the free world invade the USA and effect regime change?

That is funny (sick, but funny).
Problem of course, is that Individual-1 would sooner nuke New York City than let you - or anyone else - steal his gold toilets.
Other than that, I'd say bring it on - I even have room to put up a couple hundred of your troops!

Ah, so you're a traitor.

You didn't read it, did you?

He said that they would be 'greeted as liberators'.

After all, it would merely be the application of United States' own 'Monroe Doctrine'.

ROFLMAOAY
 
I read it. I read it word for word.

The South didn't win the Civil War, but then again, the deck was stacked against us from the beginning. It was akin to playing a chess game except it was where the whites started with no queen, rooks, or bishops. Against all odds, and with practically no chance of winning from the onset, it was still close, and there's a reason (a damn good reason) for that.

People of the South don't need a fair playing field--we aren't all liberal pieces of shit. I'm talking about the kind of pieces of shit that comes straight from shitsville. Southern folk can start out disadvantaged, poor, and with no military training. The point is, for the South, it doesn't have to start out fair. With little to no money, the fight was on, and the few knights we had were as Great as the sun is blistering hot, and the pawns had grit like no other patron of battles of centuries past. It was the sheer vastness of what money could buy, not the character of northerners, that ultimately led to victory.

If Canada wanted to invade, well, first off, they would have no chance in holy hell of success, even with the assistance of foreign nations, and that's because we have a substantial number of Republicans ready, willing, and able to fight a fury like no empire of history has ever wrote about. Sure, the assistance of our northern brethren, a few scattered democrats, and the might of the arsenals amassed by the great U.S. of A. will be a substantial contribution to our success, but the inner determination of those cornbread fed in the south would be the tipping scale should things ever be so close again.

I'm not disillusioned. I know I couldn't take on an army singlehandedly; hell, I couldn't win against an invading police force, but just as assuredly as I could take out more of them than them of I should they attack, I could more than one-up anyone who supported housing a couple hundred of their troops trying to take the US out.

I read it. I read it word for word.
 
This funny article has a few good points: https://www.macleans.ca/opinion/the-case-for-invading-america/

By the USA's own long held and often repeated doctrine, shouldn't we, the rest of the free world invade the USA and effect regime change?
Just spam social media. Americans are apparently dumb enough to let it affect their voting. Start a #awayfromtheGOP movement with people that think Trump is the last straw and they are leaving the Republican Party.
 
You Quislings are all alike.

Are you a Trump supporter?

If the answer is yes, I think you know what I am going to say next.

Thanks, but I'm married.

This shocks and surprises me. Then again I suppose compared to some women I row with on here, it's not out of the question that people with equal levels of opposing insanity to that must exist. But I am pretty sure what he was trying to intimate was "if you are a trump supporter, you are a traitor to the Constitution and the nation."
 
Thanks, but I'm married.

This shocks and surprises me. Then again I suppose compared to some women I row with on here, it's not out of the question that people with equal levels of opposing insanity to that must exist. But I am pretty sure what he was trying to intimate was "if you are a trump supporter, you are a traitor to the Constitution and the nation."

So you have a hard time with humor, apparently.
 
Thanks, but I'm married.

This shocks and surprises me. Then again I suppose compared to some women I row with on here, it's not out of the question that people with equal levels of opposing insanity to that must exist. But I am pretty sure what he was trying to intimate was "if you are a trump supporter, you are a traitor to the Constitution and the nation."

So you have a hard time with humor, apparently.

I guess it's the same problem you have with understanding what it means to be a traitor to the Constitution and founding principles of our nation.
 
Back
Top Bottom