rldctrd ofgicial?
No. It means an elected official refusing to enforce law and order and allowing an extremist fringe to occupy part of the city.
Most 1/6 rioters are still in prison. Unlike the far left bombers or 2020 rioters.
A 16-17 year old murderer should not be given a pass just because he is 1-2 years shy of the age of majority.
No. Most were not even arrested.
Do they make a habit of keeping you informed?
No one is suggesting a pass. Perhaps your punishment boner is draining blood ftom your brain which is reducing its effectiveness?
I read the local paper.
So, "no".
The alternative is a de facto pass. That's why it is possible to transfer minors to adult court. Note, their age is still considered in sentencing but it is far longer than what is possible in the juvenile system.
The answer to your admittedly silly question is indeed "no".
Have the police identified any suspects?rldctrd ofgicial?
No. It means an elected official refusing to enforce law and order and allowing an extremist fringe to occupy part of the city.
It extends to prosecutors not prosecuting crimes committed by these rioters.
This is not peaceful protesting:
Those involved should have been prosecuted. Unfortunately, neither Paul Howard nor Fanni Willis brought any charges that I am aware of.
I don’t know that anybody is talking about giving a minor a ‘pass’ because they are a minor. I think that the law recognizes, as does brain science, that those we deem minors lack the same capacity for judgement and self control and long term thinking that an adult possesses. Their brains and minds are still developing. Sentencing them to adult time in adult prison is not justice and can cause more harm than good.
Not sure about these particular individuals, but often police will identify suspects but the fauxgressive DAs will not prosecute.
Of course you do. Are these minors serving their time with adults?
Fauxgressive prosecutors like Gascon in LA do. He categorically refuses to allow transfer to the adult system, even though the juvenile system is not equipped to deal with serious crimes committed by minors.
There is no switch that gets turned at 18, but yes, young people are more impulsive, and their age can and should be taken into account for sentencing. That said, the maximum possible under the juvenile system is inadequate for serious crimes like murder.
How much time do you think a 16 year old should do for robbery and murder? How about murder ordered by a gang?
I think in most cases they serve time in juvi until they turn 18 and get transferred to adult prison, but I am sure this varies by state.
Do you genuinely believe that five or six years of incarceration is not a significant sentence? Or that recidivism is significantly less likely after 25 years in an adult prison than it would be after five years in juvenile detention?
FTFY.
Not for murder. It's basically a slap on the wrist.
