Sorry, no. This is not Russia.
I do not like AOC. She is not just too far left, but there is something unserious about her. Take her GND. She insists that the issue is urgent, and yet what has she done on the issue in the half decade since she first introduced that resolution? Also, that infamous FAQ with "getting rid of farting cows" is not exactly a sign of a serious policy proposal.
I don't know. She may have peaked in the House. I think she is too left to win presidency, and she would need a statewide office (senator, governor) as a stepping stone, and even winning stateside would be an uphill climb for her. Queens and Bronx are very different than the rest of the state.
How much do Dems have to do to appease black women? Biden gave them a SCOTUS justice and the vice president, and Gavin Newsom "no E" gave them a temporary senate seat. In Maryland the party establishment went balls to the walls for Angela Alsobrooks and all but ignored her primary opponent.
Not just the MAGA crowd, it would be suicide with independents as well. Especially now that Bernie has gone full movement leftist and embraced things that he eschewed before, like identity politics and hatred of Israel. He even got the islamofascist Linda "the Cockroach" Sarsour to be his surrogate in 2020.
Yes, he would be a formidable candidate. The worry is that his sexuality would be a turnoff for certain parts of the Democratic base, especially the black and Latino Dems, who tend to be much more traditionally religious than the median Democrat. Remember Prop 8 in California?
Should Dems like Obama endorse female candidates simply for being female?
Hillary was very much supported by the DNC. Kamala was selected for veep - in fact Biden pledged to only consider women for the position. He also pledged to nominate a black woman to SCOTUS. How much more support do you want?
I think KH was a very flawed candidate in 2020, but she would get full party support, as would GW. Why do you think they would not?
Serious female candidates like KH (despite her flaws) or GW could, and probably would win. AOC and Jasmine Crockett would not be serious candidates. Both are just in House members, and the last president whose highest office was a House member was James Garfield in 1880 if I am not mistaken. Besides, the only reason JC is known is her catfight with MTG. For the record, her false lashes are ratchet. Real talk.
Sure. Grandpa Bunker seldom stops things from being printed at the source, not his style. Remember Noon Against Putin? Rather, he finds out who was responsible, drops a few hints that they've shortened their lifespan, watches them run around from country to country for a couple of months to years driving up more headlines. Then he either arrests them for publishing "fake news", if its a minor case, or in more serious cases, has them messily assassinated in a way that avoids directly implicating him but making it abundantly clear to the public who was responsible. The system works. After a few decades of this, only the most bold of reporters are willing to defy him, a manageable number, and there's some reliably good bloodsport for the Russian public to enjoy.
He could've done this the first go-around and given his age no one would have questioned it. Then unlikable Harris could have proven her bona fides and possibly been more palatable for this election or challenged if necessary. But they never do this. If Biden wins the only way he's going out is feet first. Just like RBG could have stepped down in a more timely manner.
I never claimed russian media were free. But if shit hits the fan or Putin becomes senile, yes they will call for Putin to step down.
Jill and Hunter will make sure he will
Nobody ever actually said this said:
I seem to recall another President who refused to leave the White House when it was past his time to go. What was his name? Hmmm...
Trump, that's -2 points for being full of shit during the debate.Reuters said:
