The delusional TDS accusers once again are completely silent.
Again, making me wonder how much of their words is performance art.
Lots of them think this is normal. It’s a sort of arrested development thing; they been throwing the same tantrum since they were three - just like Trump.
I screwed something up here^.
Iirc you are a lawyer?
That is exactly what he said, as well as calling her a moron. I guess you failed to read the link I quoted in the post following that one. It's all over the news and it's disgusting that a presidential candidate can call to have his opponents executed. Or were you being sarcastic and I missed that.That's not what he said. There's no need to exaggerate what he spews.Did anyone else hear that Trump is now threatening to execute Liz Cheney? He said she should be put in a barrel and shot. If anyone else had said that, I'm pretty sure they would be arrested for making a terrorist threat.
You did misparaphrase it. He didn't say put her in a barrel and shoot her. He could have been using the worst metaphor with SCOTUS one could ever use, the only possible interpretation that doesn't mean put her in front of a firing squad, and Trump lacks the intelligence to even make that metaphor. He is dumber than Drax's butt.That is exactly what he said, as well as calling her a moron.That's not what he said. There's no need to exaggerate what he spews.Did anyone else hear that Trump is now threatening to execute Liz Cheney? He said she should be put in a barrel and shot. If anyone else had said that, I'm pretty sure they would be arrested for making a terrorist threat.
Hurtinbuckaroo isn't exactly an easy goer on Trump. So let's tap the brakes here.
I didn't need to read your link because I've already read what he said. Let's look at the whole quote:That is exactly what he said, as well as calling her a moron. I guess you failed to read the link I quoted in the post following that one. It's all over the news and it's disgusting that a presidential candidate can call to have his opponents executed. Or were you being sarcastic and I missed that.That's not what he said. There's no need to exaggerate what he spews.Did anyone else hear that Trump is now threatening to execute Liz Cheney? He said she should be put in a barrel and shot. If anyone else had said that, I'm pretty sure they would be arrested for making a terrorist threat.
Sure, but have you considered how bad Kamala's laughter is?
Thanks! It does get exhausting having to fact check every thing he says. The reporting on this was a bit loose. Let my guard down once...I didn't need to read your link because I've already read what he said. Let's look at the whole quote:That is exactly what he said, as well as calling her a moron. I guess you failed to read the link I quoted in the post following that one. It's all over the news and it's disgusting that a presidential candidate can call to have his opponents executed. Or were you being sarcastic and I missed that.That's not what he said. There's no need to exaggerate what he spews.Did anyone else hear that Trump is now threatening to execute Liz Cheney? He said she should be put in a barrel and shot. If anyone else had said that, I'm pretty sure they would be arrested for making a terrorist threat.
“She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, okay? Let’s see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face. They’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building, saying, ‘Oh gee, let’s send 10,000 troops right in the mouth of the enemy."
Seems pretty clear to me that he's saying, "She wouldn't be so gung-ho on sending people off to war if she had to go with them."
Your interpretation that he was calling for her execution is wildly off-base, and I'm calling you on it. He didn't say she should be "put in a barrel" or that she should be shot, as you've claimed twice now. As I said, he throws out enough crazy nonsense without having to make absurd exaggerations about his statements.
“Let’s put there there with nine barrels SHOOTING AT HER”I didn't need to read your link because I've already read what he said. Let's look at the whole quote:That is exactly what he said, as well as calling her a moron. I guess you failed to read the link I quoted in the post following that one. It's all over the news and it's disgusting that a presidential candidate can call to have his opponents executed. Or were you being sarcastic and I missed that.That's not what he said. There's no need to exaggerate what he spews.Did anyone else hear that Trump is now threatening to execute Liz Cheney? He said she should be put in a barrel and shot. If anyone else had said that, I'm pretty sure they would be arrested for making a terrorist threat.
“She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, okay? Let’s see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face. They’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building, saying, ‘Oh gee, let’s send 10,000 troops right in the mouth of the enemy."
Seems pretty clear to me that he's saying, "She wouldn't be so gung-ho on sending people off to war if she had to go with them."
Your interpretation that he was calling for her execution is wildly off-base, and I'm calling you on it. He didn't say she should be "put in a barrel" or that she should be shot, as you've claimed twice now. As I said, he throws out enough crazy nonsense without having to make absurd exaggerations about his statements.
I take no pleasure in defending Trump, but that's a reasonable interpretation of what he's trying to communicate. He's terrible at communication, just one of many reasons why he shouldn't be President, but I don't think he's actively calling for the execution of Liz Cheney in this quote, even if that is something that he might actually want to do.I didn't need to read your link because I've already read what he said. Let's look at the whole quote:That is exactly what he said, as well as calling her a moron. I guess you failed to read the link I quoted in the post following that one. It's all over the news and it's disgusting that a presidential candidate can call to have his opponents executed. Or were you being sarcastic and I missed that.That's not what he said. There's no need to exaggerate what he spews.Did anyone else hear that Trump is now threatening to execute Liz Cheney? He said she should be put in a barrel and shot. If anyone else had said that, I'm pretty sure they would be arrested for making a terrorist threat.
“She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, okay? Let’s see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face. They’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building, saying, ‘Oh gee, let’s send 10,000 troops right in the mouth of the enemy."
Seems pretty clear to me that he's saying, "She wouldn't be so gung-ho on sending people off to war if she had to go with them."
Your interpretation that he was calling for her execution is wildly off-base, and I'm calling you on it. He didn't say she should be "put in a barrel" or that she should be shot, as you've claimed twice now. As I said, he throws out enough crazy nonsense without having to make absurd exaggerations about his statements.
Yep, I'm an attorney. I do family law and some civil litigation.
Enough to give a very solid impression that if Trump seizes power, civil law will become a major shitshow.
Sounds pretty familiar to the conversations we're quietly having in higher ed. People like to imagine in brighter moments that state law at least will protect them, if they live in a "blue state". But there are way too many threads leading back to the White House already, and the Trump administration will be building more. Chaotically and ineffectively as before, but that's cold comfort if you need to get anything done.
Well, then we will have to agree to disagree. He has threatened numerous people, but what he said about Cheney is worse than most of his other threads. You can pretend that he wasn't serious, but I think if he could, he would physically attack most anyone who is against him, especially a Republican who is campaigning against him. Sure, he's nuttier than a fruitcake, but psychopaths like him have no moral compass.I didn't need to read your link because I've already read what he said. Let's look at the whole quote:That is exactly what he said, as well as calling her a moron. I guess you failed to read the link I quoted in the post following that one. It's all over the news and it's disgusting that a presidential candidate can call to have his opponents executed. Or were you being sarcastic and I missed that.That's not what he said. There's no need to exaggerate what he spews.Did anyone else hear that Trump is now threatening to execute Liz Cheney? He said she should be put in a barrel and shot. If anyone else had said that, I'm pretty sure they would be arrested for making a terrorist threat.
“She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, okay? Let’s see how she feels about it. You know, when the guns are trained on her face. They’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building, saying, ‘Oh gee, let’s send 10,000 troops right in the mouth of the enemy."
Seems pretty clear to me that he's saying, "She wouldn't be so gung-ho on sending people off to war if she had to go with them."
Your interpretation that he was calling for her execution is wildly off-base, and I'm calling you on it. He didn't say she should be "put in a barrel" or that she should be shot, as you've claimed twice now. As I said, he throws out enough crazy nonsense without having to make absurd exaggerations about his statements.
