Shadowy Man
Contributor
Well not any moron with enough money obviously.
read what it says under the picture.
2013 is completely made up and 2014 includes some of 2015
So, that sharp spike at the end of the graph is a complete fabrication.
Actually, 2013 isn't on the graph at all. To correct for the addition of 2015 in the 2014 data point, one could make the assumption that the income was evenly distributed, so adding 4 months would be an additional third. Multiplying the number on the graph by 3/4 gives something around $22M, which is nearly perfectly in line with the rise from 2008 onward. Hence, the word "surge" is misleading at best, and likely just a lie.