Thomas II
Contributor
Are they going to recount???
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politics/hillary-clinton-challenge-results/
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politics/hillary-clinton-challenge-results/
I don't like vague claims made publicly. They either can demonstrate something that is clearly an irregularity or they can't. The outcomes in WI, PA, and MI are in line with the exit polling.Are they going to recount???
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politics/hillary-clinton-challenge-results/
When I was a contractor for the government, I did handle classified data. I handled it on a government computer at a government desk in a government office, but I was a contractor handling government data.
Other contractors may have something different to report. Part of my in-processing briefing included "Don't you mix the data, don't do it. Don't put company data on the government computer, don't put government data on the company computer, and don't you dare put either of them on your personal computer."
Isn't that exactly what Clinton did?
I don't like vague claims made publicly. They either can demonstrate something that is clearly an irregularity or they can't. The outcomes in WI, PA, and MI are in line with the exit polling.Are they going to recount???
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politics/hillary-clinton-challenge-results/
They had the time (8 years) to make sure that the system was hack proof. Apparently they didn't...But why didn't they?
They had the time (8 years) to make sure that the system was hack proof. Apparently they didn't...But why didn't they?
Given your new leader's pressing concerns about the legitimacy of the electoral process, I'm sure that the full weight of the United States' government will be tasked with taking a hard look into that and delivering the American people some serious answers on the matter.
Are they going to recount???
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/22/politics/hillary-clinton-challenge-results/
The facts are, that Trump received 57% of the college vote! 302 ec votes to Hillary 232!
http://ijr.com/wildfire/2016/11/742944-the-fate-of-michigans-election-is-finally-in-we-have-a-winner-in-tightest-race-in-state-history/
The Fate of Michigan's Election is Finally In--And We Have a Winner in Tightest Race in State History
... snip ...
Trump will be the first Republican presidential candidate to win the State of Michigan since 1988. The major vote totals, as they stand:
Donald J. Trump, Republican: 2,279,543
Hillary Clinton, Democratic: 2,268,839
Gary Johnson, Libertarian: 172,136
Jill Stein, Green: 51,463
... snip ...
News: Jill Stein's going to file for a recount in WI, MI & PA if she can raise the money—will announce on FB shortly.
LolNot so fast..
http://ijr.com/wildfire/2016/11/742944-the-fate-of-michigans-election-is-finally-in-we-have-a-winner-in-tightest-race-in-state-history/
The Fate of Michigan's Election is Finally In--And We Have a Winner in Tightest Race in State History
... snip ...
Trump will be the first Republican presidential candidate to win the State of Michigan since 1988. The major vote totals, as they stand:
Donald J. Trump, Republican: 2,279,543
Hillary Clinton, Democratic: 2,268,839
Gary Johnson, Libertarian: 172,136
Jill Stein, Green: 51,463
... snip ...
News: Jill Stein's going to file for a recount in WI, MI & PA if she can raise the money—will announce on FB shortly.
Maybe Stein got more than 51,453 votes in MI and actually won the state.
Not so fast..
http://ijr.com/wildfire/2016/11/742944-the-fate-of-michigans-election-is-finally-in-we-have-a-winner-in-tightest-race-in-state-history/
The Fate of Michigan's Election is Finally In--And We Have a Winner in Tightest Race in State History
... snip ...
Trump will be the first Republican presidential candidate to win the State of Michigan since 1988. The major vote totals, as they stand:
Donald J. Trump, Republican: 2,279,543
Hillary Clinton, Democratic: 2,268,839
Gary Johnson, Libertarian: 172,136
Jill Stein, Green: 51,463
... snip ...
News: Jill Stein's going to file for a recount in WI, MI & PA if she can raise the money—will announce on FB shortly.
Maybe Stein got more than 51,453 votes in MI and actually won the state.
Not so fast..
http://ijr.com/wildfire/2016/11/742944-the-fate-of-michigans-election-is-finally-in-we-have-a-winner-in-tightest-race-in-state-history/
The Fate of Michigan's Election is Finally In--And We Have a Winner in Tightest Race in State History
... snip ...
Trump will be the first Republican presidential candidate to win the State of Michigan since 1988. The major vote totals, as they stand:
Donald J. Trump, Republican: 2,279,543
Hillary Clinton, Democratic: 2,268,839
Gary Johnson, Libertarian: 172,136
Jill Stein, Green: 51,463
... snip ...
News: Jill Stein's going to file for a recount in WI, MI & PA if she can raise the money—will announce on FB shortly.
Maybe Stein got more than 51,453 votes in MI and actually won the state.
Not so fast..
Maybe Stein got more than 51,453 votes in MI and actually won the state.
I can't believe that over 51.000 people actually believe in Cinderella and living in LA LA land!
Personal opinion only:I can't believe that over 51.000 people actually believe in Cinderella and living in LA LA land!
Does she think that 2 million votes were miscounted or maybe she should have gotten an extra 100 or so votes. At least Trump didn't complain about the outcome.
Personal opinion only:Does she think that 2 million votes were miscounted or maybe she should have gotten an extra 100 or so votes. At least Trump didn't complain about the outcome.
Although Stein holds some off-the-wall beliefs I don't think she is actually daft enough to think that she may have won the State. I think she is in denial that Clinton lost and thinks or hopes that a recount will give Clinton the victory (shades of Florida 2000). This is likely driven by the guilty realization that if the votes for the Green party had instead been for the Democrats then Clinton would have won MI. I see this as further evidence for her delusion, believing that those who voted for her party would have voted Democrat if she had not run - Green party voters were actually protest, Never Hillary, voters or their base who reject both major political parties so more likely would have just not voted or maybe even voted for another third party.
Personal opinion only:
Although Stein holds some off-the-wall beliefs I don't think she is actually daft enough to think that she may have won the State. I think she is in denial that Clinton lost and thinks or hopes that a recount will give Clinton the victory (shades of Florida 2000). This is likely driven by the guilty realization that if the votes for the Green party had instead been for the Democrats then Clinton would have won MI. I see this as further evidence for her delusion, believing that those who voted for her party would have voted Democrat if she had not run - Green party voters were actually protest, Never Hillary, voters or their base who reject both major political parties so more likely would have just not voted or maybe even voted for another third party.
Hey, doesn't mean that we won't blame her for next year's war with Iran and the one with North Korea the year after that. Also, it'll be her fault that the US shot some missiles at Barbados because Trump didn't like some cartoon that came out of there.