• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Well... it's Trump... again. #47, here we go.

He wants tanks on city streets, which will destroy those streets.
 
Does anybody here have enough experience with the movie industry to explain just how one can put a tariff on movies?

It's not like they arrive in America packed in a TEU on a cargo ship..
No one here buys the movie. They buy tickets to see the movie.
So Trump is going to put customs officials in theaters to collect duties from anyone buying a ticket to see "I'm Still Here"?

I'm genuinely confused about how and when the tariff will be collected, hence the question...
 
Does anybody here have enough experience with the movie industry to explain just how one can put a tariff on movies?

It's not like they arrive in America packed in a TEU on a cargo ship..
No one here buys the movie. They buy tickets to see the movie.
So Trump is going to put customs officials in theaters to collect duties from anyone buying a ticket to see "I'm Still Here"?

I'm genuinely confused about how and when the tariff will be collected, hence the question...

You've probably put more thought into it than Rump has. He spews shit and others have to figure it out, oftemn very poorly. Like how all US embasies demanded local suppliers not have DEI programs even when local country laws demanded them.
 
Does anybody here have enough experience with the movie industry to explain just how one can put a tariff on movies?

It's not like they arrive in America packed in a TEU on a cargo ship..
I was thinking about that too. Movies aren't really a physical thing. Sure there can be a canister of film, that can assign a value of a few hundred dollars to, but a tariff on that won't get much. Films can be digitally streamed from one nation to another. Also what about if movie filmed in say Australia but is then edited in USA? The producer can bring it (a copy) in his suit case when flying from one nation to another.
It seems that the only way can get a decent tariff is at the cinema by doubling the ticket price, and that won't be popular, and seems illegal, because the audience is paying for a service, not a physical object.

His claim that Hollywood was dying is completely laughable. There is more product being produced than you can wave a stick at; that is, it is almost certainly at an all time high.
 
Does anybody here have enough experience with the movie industry to explain just how one can put a tariff on movies?

It's not like they arrive in America packed in a TEU on a cargo ship..
No one here buys the movie. They buy tickets to see the movie.
So Trump is going to put customs officials in theaters to collect duties from anyone buying a ticket to see "I'm Still Here"?

I'm genuinely confused about how and when the tariff will be collected, hence the question...
The plan is to cook the streaming markets, and if possible kill California. The effect will be minimal, because literally no one understands what such a tariff would mean, critically including those whose job it would be to "collect" such a tariff.
 
Organized criminals, drug cartels and human traffickers, rejoice! Daddy Trump has come to save you.

Trump Team Set to Dissolve Reagan-Era Transnational Crime Unit

Task forces that specialize in fighting organized crime, drug cartels and human traffickers were told to shut down by Sept. 30, according to documents and people familiar with the matter

 
I could be wrong but I believe that the Supreme Court ruled that Trump can't be prosecuted for official acts as president. They did not rule that any official act is legal.
That seems like hair-splitting to me. "It wasn't legal, but you can't be prosecuted for it" makes laws into mere suggestions.
 
100% tariff on movies.
article said:
"I am authorizing the Department of Commerce, and the United States Trade Representative, to immediately begin the process of instituting a 100% Tariff on any and all Movies coming into our Country that are produced in Foreign Lands," Trump said late Sunday in a post on his Truth Social platform. "WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!"
The United States generally owns global movie industry. Apparently, that isn't enough now. Trump says the movie industry is dying in the US.
So there will be no more shooting on location??
Runner, with Alan Ritchson and Owen Wilson, has been shooting in Brisbane since March 31st. There were a load of road closures in the CBD (and on the Storey Bridge) on Saturday.

David Walliams's Fing is also currently shooting here.
 
I could be wrong but I believe that the Supreme Court ruled that Trump can't be prosecuted for official acts as president. They did not rule that any official act is legal.
That seems like hair-splitting to me. "It wasn't legal, but you can't be prosecuted for it" makes laws into mere suggestions.

Not really splitting hairs. It's Presidential Immunity - not that I agree with the Supreme Court but it's only for the President.


Presidential immunity

Presidential immunity is the concept that a sitting president of the United States has both civil and criminal immunity for their official acts.[a] Neither civil nor criminal immunity is explicitly granted in the Constitution or any federal statute.[1][2] However, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Trump v. United States (2024) that all presidents have absolute criminal immunity for official acts under core constitutional powers, presumptive immunity for other official acts, and no immunity for unofficial acts. The court made this decision after former President Trump claimed absolute immunity from being investigated for any crimes committed while in office.[3][4]

Previously, the Supreme Court had found in Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982) that the president has absolute immunity from civil damages actions regarding conduct within the "outer perimeter" of their duties. However, in Clinton v. Jones (1997), the court ruled against temporary immunity for sitting presidents from suits arising from pre-presidency conduct. Some scholars suggested an immunity from arrest and criminal prosecution as well, a view which became the practice of the Department of Justice under a pair of memoranda (1973 and 2000) from the Office of Legal Counsel. Presidents Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton, and Donald Trump were criminally investigated while in office, but none were prosecuted while still in office.


 
I could be wrong but I believe that the Supreme Court ruled that Trump can't be prosecuted for official acts as president. They did not rule that any official act is legal.
That seems like hair-splitting to me. "It wasn't legal, but you can't be prosecuted for it" makes laws into mere suggestions.
Not really splitting hairs. It's Presidential Immunity - not that I agree with the Supreme Court but it's only for the President.
Yes and no. The issue becomes if the President is involved, it makes it very hard to even investigate it. So even if you can parse things together while keeping the President out, it still gets into very murky waters that'll make prosecution very hard because every damn moment will be appealed to SCOTUS.
 
I could be wrong but I believe that the Supreme Court ruled that Trump can't be prosecuted for official acts as president. They did not rule that any official act is legal.
That seems like hair-splitting to me. "It wasn't legal, but you can't be prosecuted for it" makes laws into mere suggestions.
Not really splitting hairs. It's Presidential Immunity - not that I agree with the Supreme Court but it's only for the President.
Yes and no. The issue becomes if the President is involved, it makes it very hard to even investigate it. So even if you can parse things together while keeping the President out, it still gets into very murky waters that'll make prosecution very hard because every damn moment will be appealed to SCOTUS.

Particularly hard with Trump because he will ignore rulings. He'll say he's following the order but he and his minions will do nothing. The DoJ will ignore court rulings and Trump will always pardon someone who gets prosecuted for ignoring a court order or anything to block an investigation.
 
Trump suggests Americans will need to buy less as costs increase (you know, get your child 5 instead of 250), but this will only be short term and the market will return to normal levels.

Of course, this seems impossible when one considers the US Economy is primarily driven by consumer spending.

And then this ignores his personal biblical level of gluttony.
 
Meanwhile, Trump officially adds or adjusts existing holiday.

May 8th will be something about victory in WWII... when that'd be VE Day, not the end of WWII for the allies.
Nov. 11th will be something about victory in WWI. Remembrance Day in Europe is very somber. The winning side doesn't take much celebration in it, unless you consider poppies too flamboyant.

Personally I can't wait until he creates a Holiday for April 9th, about how America kicked ass and should take credit for it.
 
He wants tanks on city streets, which will destroy those streets.
I want to be driving one of those tanks, On PA Ave.,
Personally I can't wait until he creates a Holiday for April 9th, about how America kicked ass and should take credit for it.
I can see him making Jan 6th a holiday.
 
"It wasn't legal, but you can't be prosecuted for it" makes laws into mere suggestions.
Correct. Also makes a mockery of whatever supposed holder of authority issues such an abdication of reposibility (never mind its obvious stupidity) and passes it off as a "ruling".
 
I realize Kristen Welker had time constraints. I just wish she had touched on a few more issues with POTUS.

Welker: Mr. President, Reuters is reporting that Vladimir Putin has offered you the position of marshal in the Spetsnaz, or Russian special forces. Will you accept, and if so, how will you handle the time compromise between your duties in Washington and Russia?
Trump: I have to answer, I don't know. I have the best team, and they have worked out a schedule that puts me in Russia, Washington, and Mar-a-Lago. Other than that, the Russians love me and always treat me with respect.
Welker: Mr. President, the College of Cardinals will meet on May 8 to begin the process of electing a new Pope. There is some speculation that you are under consideration. If you are selected, will you assume the Papacy, and do you feel qualified for the position?
Trump: First, about qualified, no question. The Bible is my favorite book, and everyone should own several, and the best Bible is the God Bless the USA Bible. I would be the best Pope and most Popest Pope since Jesus Christ. I would be your favorite Pope. But whatever the Oriole College decides is fine with me.
Welker: As a follow-up, who is your favorite hero in the Bible?
Trump: That is such a personal thing, I wouldn't like to say. There are so, so many great heroes, and they're all great. I will tell you that Eric and Don Jr.'s favorite Bible hero is Hercules, because he was so strong and could lift, like, huge boulders and trees. Almost like God!
Welker: Mr. President, your defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has said that he is prepared to use the AT4 Shoulder-Mounted Rocket Launcher and the AH-64 Apache attack helicopter against the Hands Off protesters. Would you ever issue such an order?
Trump: I'm not ruling out anything. Look, these are people who in many cases were just let out of jail or insane asylums. They are some of the worst people on earth. They never liked Trump. And they are very stupid people. Just look at their hero: Joe Biden.
Welker: Mr. President, our country may face food production problems, both with trade tariffs and a worker shortage. Given that possibility, do you think cannabalism is wrong?
Trump: This is so unfair. We're talking short, very short-term problems with this stuff, and then we'll be rolling in wealth. We'll be winning so much, you'll tell me, President Trump, we're tired of winning!! I'll say this, in answer to your question. America's kids don't need fifteen arms or legs or whatever for their groceries. Groceries -- no one used that word before I started using it. The groceries. You can get by with one arm or one leg and that will be a lot of groceries. And maybe an egg.
Welker: Mr. President, would you kick or trip or otherwise assault a blind woman, if -- hypothetically -- she was begging in front of the White House?
Trump: That is such an unfair question, and again, this is an unfair interview. You didn't say if she was nasty to me. Did she call me a name? Did she accuse me of things I never did? Plenty of the blind do not like Trump. Everybody knows that. That's why they're blind!! Look, my father, and he was a very respected businessman, told me that if someone hits you, you hit them back 15 times harder, or you kill them. It's very simple, it's like Bing Bong, Bing-Bing Bong.
 
When I was around 5, there was a parade in my hometown. Among all the horses and whatnots that went down the street, I just about crapped myself in wonder upon seeing an armored personnel carrier. Totally blew my mind.

But I was 5. What's the Trumpite's excuse?

Anyway, since I've accepted Trump as the living embodiment of unassailable shit, I'm dying to see what a military parade in the U.S. would look like.

Are the TC's going to be standing halfway up out of an Abrams, saluting Cheetolini as they drive by?
Will there be female military personnel marching in hopping lockstep wearing camo miniskirts?
I need, NEED to see Trump leading from the front of the parade in a golf cart, turning 360s while throwing paper towels to bystanders.
 
Back
Top Bottom